All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
To: Chao Yu <chao2.yu@samsung.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] f2fs: backup raw_super in sbi
Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2015 14:06:25 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20151215220625.GD66113@jaegeuk.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <010d01d1371c$c9954530$5cbfcf90$@samsung.com>

On Tue, Dec 15, 2015 at 05:40:51PM +0800, Chao Yu wrote:
> Hi Jaegeuk, Yunlei,
> 
> I help do some edits and send it out as my patch's base. :)
> 
> But if you want to send patch by yourself, please ignore this patch.

No problem to merge this patch.
Thanks Chao.

> 
> Thanks,
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Chao Yu [mailto:chao2.yu@samsung.com]
> > Sent: Tuesday, December 15, 2015 5:17 PM
> > To: Jaegeuk Kim (jaegeuk@kernel.org); Yunlei He (heyunlei@huawei.com)
> > Cc: linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
> > Subject: [PATCH 1/3] f2fs: backup raw_super in sbi
> > 
> > From: Yunlei He <heyunlei@huawei.com>
> > 
> > f2fs use fields of f2fs_super_block struct directly in a grabbed buffer.
> > 
> > Once the buffer happen to be destroyed (e.g. through dd), it may bring
> > in unpredictable effect on f2fs.
> > 
> > This patch fixes to allocate additional buffer to store datas of super
> > block rather than using grabbed block buffer directly.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Yunlei He <heyunlei@huawei.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
> > Signed-off-by: Chao Yu <chao2.yu@samsung.com>
> > ---
> >  fs/f2fs/super.c | 19 +++++++++++++++----
> >  1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/fs/f2fs/super.c b/fs/f2fs/super.c
> > index 694e092..a6eb79a 100644
> > --- a/fs/f2fs/super.c
> > +++ b/fs/f2fs/super.c
> > @@ -578,6 +578,7 @@ static void f2fs_put_super(struct super_block *sb)
> > 
> >  	sb->s_fs_info = NULL;
> >  	brelse(sbi->raw_super_buf);
> > +	kfree(sbi->raw_super);
> >  	kfree(sbi);
> >  }
> > 
> > @@ -1153,6 +1154,9 @@ static int read_raw_super_block(struct super_block *sb,
> >  	struct f2fs_super_block *super;
> >  	int err = 0;
> > 
> > +	super = kzalloc(sizeof(struct f2fs_super_block), GFP_KERNEL);
> > +	if (!super)
> > +		return -ENOMEM;
> >  retry:
> >  	buffer = sb_bread(sb, block);
> >  	if (!buffer) {
> > @@ -1168,8 +1172,7 @@ retry:
> >  		}
> >  	}
> > 
> > -	super = (struct f2fs_super_block *)
> > -		((char *)(buffer)->b_data + F2FS_SUPER_OFFSET);
> > +	memcpy(super, buffer->b_data + F2FS_SUPER_OFFSET, sizeof(*super));
> > 
> >  	/* sanity checking of raw super */
> >  	if (sanity_check_raw_super(sb, super)) {
> > @@ -1203,14 +1206,17 @@ retry:
> > 
> >  out:
> >  	/* No valid superblock */
> > -	if (!*raw_super)
> > +	if (!*raw_super) {
> > +		kfree(super);
> >  		return err;
> > +	}
> > 
> >  	return 0;
> >  }
> > 
> >  int f2fs_commit_super(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, bool recover)
> >  {
> > +	struct f2fs_super_block *super = F2FS_RAW_SUPER(sbi);
> >  	struct buffer_head *sbh = sbi->raw_super_buf;
> >  	struct buffer_head *bh;
> >  	int err;
> > @@ -1221,7 +1227,7 @@ int f2fs_commit_super(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, bool recover)
> >  		return -EIO;
> > 
> >  	lock_buffer(bh);
> > -	memcpy(bh->b_data, sbh->b_data, sbh->b_size);
> > +	memcpy(bh->b_data + F2FS_SUPER_OFFSET, super, sizeof(*super));
> >  	WARN_ON(sbh->b_size != F2FS_BLKSIZE);
> >  	set_buffer_uptodate(bh);
> >  	set_buffer_dirty(bh);
> > @@ -1237,6 +1243,10 @@ int f2fs_commit_super(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, bool recover)
> > 
> >  	/* write current valid superblock */
> >  	lock_buffer(sbh);
> > +	if (memcmp(sbh->b_data + F2FS_SUPER_OFFSET, super, sizeof(*super))) {
> > +		f2fs_msg(sbi->sb, KERN_INFO, "Write modified valid superblock");
> > +		memcpy(sbh->b_data + F2FS_SUPER_OFFSET, super, sizeof(*super));
> > +	}
> >  	set_buffer_dirty(sbh);
> >  	unlock_buffer(sbh);
> > 
> > @@ -1513,6 +1523,7 @@ free_options:
> >  	kfree(options);
> >  free_sb_buf:
> >  	brelse(raw_super_buf);
> > +	kfree(raw_super);
> >  free_sbi:
> >  	kfree(sbi);
> > 
> > --
> > 2.6.3
> 

------------------------------------------------------------------------------

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
To: Chao Yu <chao2.yu@samsung.com>
Cc: Yunlei He <heyunlei@huawei.com>,
	linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] f2fs: backup raw_super in sbi
Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2015 14:06:25 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20151215220625.GD66113@jaegeuk.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <010d01d1371c$c9954530$5cbfcf90$@samsung.com>

On Tue, Dec 15, 2015 at 05:40:51PM +0800, Chao Yu wrote:
> Hi Jaegeuk, Yunlei,
> 
> I help do some edits and send it out as my patch's base. :)
> 
> But if you want to send patch by yourself, please ignore this patch.

No problem to merge this patch.
Thanks Chao.

> 
> Thanks,
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Chao Yu [mailto:chao2.yu@samsung.com]
> > Sent: Tuesday, December 15, 2015 5:17 PM
> > To: Jaegeuk Kim (jaegeuk@kernel.org); Yunlei He (heyunlei@huawei.com)
> > Cc: linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
> > Subject: [PATCH 1/3] f2fs: backup raw_super in sbi
> > 
> > From: Yunlei He <heyunlei@huawei.com>
> > 
> > f2fs use fields of f2fs_super_block struct directly in a grabbed buffer.
> > 
> > Once the buffer happen to be destroyed (e.g. through dd), it may bring
> > in unpredictable effect on f2fs.
> > 
> > This patch fixes to allocate additional buffer to store datas of super
> > block rather than using grabbed block buffer directly.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Yunlei He <heyunlei@huawei.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
> > Signed-off-by: Chao Yu <chao2.yu@samsung.com>
> > ---
> >  fs/f2fs/super.c | 19 +++++++++++++++----
> >  1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/fs/f2fs/super.c b/fs/f2fs/super.c
> > index 694e092..a6eb79a 100644
> > --- a/fs/f2fs/super.c
> > +++ b/fs/f2fs/super.c
> > @@ -578,6 +578,7 @@ static void f2fs_put_super(struct super_block *sb)
> > 
> >  	sb->s_fs_info = NULL;
> >  	brelse(sbi->raw_super_buf);
> > +	kfree(sbi->raw_super);
> >  	kfree(sbi);
> >  }
> > 
> > @@ -1153,6 +1154,9 @@ static int read_raw_super_block(struct super_block *sb,
> >  	struct f2fs_super_block *super;
> >  	int err = 0;
> > 
> > +	super = kzalloc(sizeof(struct f2fs_super_block), GFP_KERNEL);
> > +	if (!super)
> > +		return -ENOMEM;
> >  retry:
> >  	buffer = sb_bread(sb, block);
> >  	if (!buffer) {
> > @@ -1168,8 +1172,7 @@ retry:
> >  		}
> >  	}
> > 
> > -	super = (struct f2fs_super_block *)
> > -		((char *)(buffer)->b_data + F2FS_SUPER_OFFSET);
> > +	memcpy(super, buffer->b_data + F2FS_SUPER_OFFSET, sizeof(*super));
> > 
> >  	/* sanity checking of raw super */
> >  	if (sanity_check_raw_super(sb, super)) {
> > @@ -1203,14 +1206,17 @@ retry:
> > 
> >  out:
> >  	/* No valid superblock */
> > -	if (!*raw_super)
> > +	if (!*raw_super) {
> > +		kfree(super);
> >  		return err;
> > +	}
> > 
> >  	return 0;
> >  }
> > 
> >  int f2fs_commit_super(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, bool recover)
> >  {
> > +	struct f2fs_super_block *super = F2FS_RAW_SUPER(sbi);
> >  	struct buffer_head *sbh = sbi->raw_super_buf;
> >  	struct buffer_head *bh;
> >  	int err;
> > @@ -1221,7 +1227,7 @@ int f2fs_commit_super(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, bool recover)
> >  		return -EIO;
> > 
> >  	lock_buffer(bh);
> > -	memcpy(bh->b_data, sbh->b_data, sbh->b_size);
> > +	memcpy(bh->b_data + F2FS_SUPER_OFFSET, super, sizeof(*super));
> >  	WARN_ON(sbh->b_size != F2FS_BLKSIZE);
> >  	set_buffer_uptodate(bh);
> >  	set_buffer_dirty(bh);
> > @@ -1237,6 +1243,10 @@ int f2fs_commit_super(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, bool recover)
> > 
> >  	/* write current valid superblock */
> >  	lock_buffer(sbh);
> > +	if (memcmp(sbh->b_data + F2FS_SUPER_OFFSET, super, sizeof(*super))) {
> > +		f2fs_msg(sbi->sb, KERN_INFO, "Write modified valid superblock");
> > +		memcpy(sbh->b_data + F2FS_SUPER_OFFSET, super, sizeof(*super));
> > +	}
> >  	set_buffer_dirty(sbh);
> >  	unlock_buffer(sbh);
> > 
> > @@ -1513,6 +1523,7 @@ free_options:
> >  	kfree(options);
> >  free_sb_buf:
> >  	brelse(raw_super_buf);
> > +	kfree(raw_super);
> >  free_sbi:
> >  	kfree(sbi);
> > 
> > --
> > 2.6.3
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2015-12-15 22:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-12-15  9:40 [PATCH 1/3] f2fs: backup raw_super in sbi Chao Yu
2015-12-15  9:40 ` Chao Yu
2015-12-15 22:06 ` Jaegeuk Kim [this message]
2015-12-15 22:06   ` Jaegeuk Kim
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2015-12-15  9:17 Chao Yu
2015-12-15  9:17 ` Chao Yu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20151215220625.GD66113@jaegeuk.local \
    --to=jaegeuk@kernel.org \
    --cc=chao2.yu@samsung.com \
    --cc=linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.