From: Marek Vasut <marex@denx.de>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 1/5] lib: Add wait_for_bit
Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2015 23:11:45 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201512162311.45697.marex@denx.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1450303122-17884-2-git-send-email-mateusz.kulikowski@gmail.com>
On Wednesday, December 16, 2015 at 10:58:38 PM, Mateusz Kulikowski wrote:
> Add function to poll register waiting for specific bit(s).
> Similar functions are implemented in few drivers - they are almost
> identical and can be generalized.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mateusz Kulikowski <mateusz.kulikowski@gmail.com>
> ---
>
> include/wait_bit.h | 35 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> lib/Makefile | 1 +
> lib/wait_bit.c | 45 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 3 files changed, 81 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 include/wait_bit.h
> create mode 100644 lib/wait_bit.c
>
> diff --git a/include/wait_bit.h b/include/wait_bit.h
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..052a09b
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/include/wait_bit.h
> @@ -0,0 +1,35 @@
> +/*
> + * Wait for bit with timeout and ctrlc
> + *
> + * (C) Copyright 2015 Mateusz Kulikowski <mateusz.kulikowski@gmail.com>
> + *
> + * SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0+
> + */
> +
> +#ifndef __WAIT_BIT_H
> +#define __WAIT_BIT_H
> +
> +/**
> + * wait_for_bit() waits for bit set/cleared in register
> + *
> + * Function polls register waiting for specific bit(s) change
> + * (either 0->1 or 1->0). It can fail under two conditions:
> + * - Timeout
> + * - User interaction (CTRL-C)
> + * Function succeeds only if all bits of masked register are set/cleared
> + * (depending on set option).
> + *
> + * @param prefix Prefix added to timeout messagge (message visible only
> + * with debug enabled)
> + * @param reg Register that will be read (using readl())
> + * @param mask Bit(s) of register that must be active
> + * @param set Selects wait condition (bit set or clear)
> + * @param timeout Timeout (in miliseconds)
> + * @param breakable Enables CTRL-C interruption
> + * @return 0 on success, -ETIMEDOUT or -EINTR on failure
> + */
> +int wait_for_bit(const char *prefix, const u32 *reg, const u32 mask,
> + const bool set, const unsigned int timeout,
> + const bool breakable);
> +
> +#endif
> diff --git a/lib/Makefile b/lib/Makefile
> index 1f1ff6f..6fe3ab5 100644
> --- a/lib/Makefile
> +++ b/lib/Makefile
> @@ -81,6 +81,7 @@ obj-y += time.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_TRACE) += trace.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_LIB_UUID) += uuid.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_LIB_RAND) += rand.o
> +obj-y += wait_bit.o
>
> ifdef CONFIG_SPL_BUILD
> # SPL U-Boot may use full-printf, tiny-printf or none at all
> diff --git a/lib/wait_bit.c b/lib/wait_bit.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..ac35f68
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/lib/wait_bit.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,45 @@
> +/*
> + * Wait for bit interruptible by timeout or ctrlc
> + *
> + * (C) Copyright 2015 Mateusz Kulikowski <mateusz.kulikowski@gmail.com>
> + *
> + * SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0+
> + */
> +
> +#include <common.h>
> +#include <console.h>
> +#include <asm/io.h>
> +#include <asm/errno.h>
> +
> +int wait_for_bit(const char *prefix, const u32 *reg, const u32 mask,
> + const bool set, const unsigned int timeout,
> + const bool breakable)
> +{
I wonder, what would happen if you stuffed this function into the header
file altogether ? I think this would allow the compiler to do interprocedure
optimalization on whichever file this would be included into. I wonder if
that would have any impact on the resulting code size.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-12-16 22:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-12-16 21:58 [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 0/5] Add wait_for_bit() Mateusz Kulikowski
2015-12-16 21:58 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 1/5] lib: Add wait_for_bit Mateusz Kulikowski
2015-12-16 22:11 ` Marek Vasut [this message]
2015-12-16 23:32 ` Mateusz Kulikowski
2015-12-16 23:52 ` Marek Vasut
2015-12-20 16:19 ` Mateusz Kulikowski
2015-12-16 21:58 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 2/5] usb: dwc2: Use shared wait_for_bit Mateusz Kulikowski
2015-12-16 21:58 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 3/5] usb: ohci-lpc32xx: " Mateusz Kulikowski
2015-12-16 21:58 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 4/5] usb: ehci-mx6: " Mateusz Kulikowski
2015-12-16 21:58 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 5/5] net: zynq_gem: " Mateusz Kulikowski
2015-12-17 13:57 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 0/5] Add wait_for_bit() LEMIEUX, SYLVAIN
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=201512162311.45697.marex@denx.de \
--to=marex@denx.de \
--cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.