From: will.deacon@arm.com (Will Deacon)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] locking/osq: fix ordering of node initialisation in osq_lock
Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2015 09:48:42 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20151217094655.GA11456@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <56720D78.9080706@gmail.com>
On Wed, Dec 16, 2015 at 05:18:48PM -0800, David Daney wrote:
> What is the status of this patch? It there a good likelihood that it will
> make it into v4.4?
>
> If not, we should request that c55a6ffa6285 ("locking/osq: Relax atomic
> semantics") be reverted for v4.4
I think Peter was going to send it to mingo as an urgent fix, but I've
not seen anything from the tip-bot yet.
Will
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
To: David Daney <ddaney.cavm@gmail.com>
Cc: peterz@infradead.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, andrew.pinski@caviumnetworks.com,
dbueso@suse.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH] locking/osq: fix ordering of node initialisation in osq_lock
Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2015 09:48:42 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20151217094655.GA11456@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <56720D78.9080706@gmail.com>
On Wed, Dec 16, 2015 at 05:18:48PM -0800, David Daney wrote:
> What is the status of this patch? It there a good likelihood that it will
> make it into v4.4?
>
> If not, we should request that c55a6ffa6285 ("locking/osq: Relax atomic
> semantics") be reverted for v4.4
I think Peter was going to send it to mingo as an urgent fix, but I've
not seen anything from the tip-bot yet.
Will
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-12-17 9:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-12-11 17:46 [PATCH] locking/osq: fix ordering of node initialisation in osq_lock Will Deacon
2015-12-11 17:46 ` Will Deacon
2015-12-12 0:18 ` David Daney
2015-12-12 0:18 ` David Daney
2015-12-17 1:18 ` David Daney
2015-12-17 1:18 ` David Daney
2015-12-17 9:48 ` Will Deacon [this message]
2015-12-17 9:48 ` Will Deacon
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2015-12-17 16:05 [PATCH] locking/osq: Fix " Peter Zijlstra
2015-12-17 19:04 ` Linus Torvalds
2015-12-17 19:33 ` Peter Zijlstra
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20151217094655.GA11456@arm.com \
--to=will.deacon@arm.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.