All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de>
To: Shubhrajyoti Datta <shubhrajyoti.datta@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org, linux-sh@vger.kernel.org,
	Magnus Damm <magnus.damm@gmail.com>,
	Simon Horman <horms@verge.net.au>,
	Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>,
	Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>,
	linux-pm@vger.kernel.org,
	Sylwester Nawrocki <s.nawrocki@samsung.com>,
	Charles Keepax <ckeepax@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] i2c: proper RuntimePM for the adapter device
Date: Thu, 24 Dec 2015 09:41:06 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20151224084105.GA1548@katana> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAKfKVtHt8BpakkffRp=_2GUxqK5JO0WCsizCrjtwH5hv+TWvWg@mail.gmail.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 504 bytes --]


> > RuntimePM for the logical adapter device should be handled in a central place
> > by the core, and not by drivers. This series does exactly that.
> 
> This is good idea.

Thanks!

> Also maybe we can add a flag that the driver enables.
> that way for a short period till the driver removes the call
> the double call is not there.

The only driver I found was the s3c2410 and I fixed it. Is there another
one? Then, I'd update my series because I want a consistent state in one
go.


[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 819 bytes --]

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de>
To: Shubhrajyoti Datta <shubhrajyoti.datta@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org, linux-sh@vger.kernel.org,
	Magnus Damm <magnus.damm@gmail.com>,
	Simon Horman <horms@verge.net.au>,
	Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>,
	Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>,
	linux-pm@vger.kernel.org,
	Sylwester Nawrocki <s.nawrocki@samsung.com>,
	Charles Keepax <ckeepax@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] i2c: proper RuntimePM for the adapter device
Date: Thu, 24 Dec 2015 08:41:06 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20151224084105.GA1548@katana> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAKfKVtHt8BpakkffRp=_2GUxqK5JO0WCsizCrjtwH5hv+TWvWg@mail.gmail.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 504 bytes --]


> > RuntimePM for the logical adapter device should be handled in a central place
> > by the core, and not by drivers. This series does exactly that.
> 
> This is good idea.

Thanks!

> Also maybe we can add a flag that the driver enables.
> that way for a short period till the driver removes the call
> the double call is not there.

The only driver I found was the s3c2410 and I fixed it. Is there another
one? Then, I'd update my series because I want a consistent state in one
go.


[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 819 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2015-12-24  8:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-12-23 17:19 [PATCH 0/2] i2c: proper RuntimePM for the adapter device Wolfram Sang
2015-12-23 17:19 ` Wolfram Sang
2015-12-23 17:19 ` [PATCH 1/2] i2c: always enable " Wolfram Sang
2015-12-23 17:19   ` Wolfram Sang
2016-01-10  8:27   ` Wolfram Sang
2016-01-10  8:27     ` Wolfram Sang
2015-12-23 17:19 ` [PATCH 2/2] i2c: s3c2410: remove superfluous runtime PM calls Wolfram Sang
2015-12-23 17:19   ` Wolfram Sang
2016-01-10  8:27   ` Wolfram Sang
2016-01-10  8:27     ` Wolfram Sang
2015-12-24  5:54 ` [PATCH 0/2] i2c: proper RuntimePM for the adapter device Shubhrajyoti Datta
2015-12-24  5:54   ` Shubhrajyoti Datta
2015-12-24  8:41   ` Wolfram Sang [this message]
2015-12-24  8:41     ` Wolfram Sang
2015-12-24 17:04     ` Shubhrajyoti Datta
2015-12-24 17:16       ` Shubhrajyoti Datta
2015-12-24 22:25       ` Wolfram Sang
2015-12-24 22:25         ` Wolfram Sang
2015-12-25  5:53         ` Shubhrajyoti Datta
2015-12-25  5:54           ` Shubhrajyoti Datta

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20151224084105.GA1548@katana \
    --to=wsa@the-dreams.de \
    --cc=ckeepax@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com \
    --cc=geert@linux-m68k.org \
    --cc=horms@verge.net.au \
    --cc=laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com \
    --cc=linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-sh@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=magnus.damm@gmail.com \
    --cc=s.nawrocki@samsung.com \
    --cc=shubhrajyoti.datta@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.