* Re: [Webhob] Builds table information
[not found] <CDD62EAD.2B890%belen.barros.pena@intel.com>
@ 2013-06-06 13:18 ` Barros Pena, Belen
2013-06-06 13:33 ` Paul Eggleton
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Barros Pena, Belen @ 2013-06-06 13:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Dragomir, CalinX L, Damian, Alexandru, Paul Eggleton
Cc: webhob@yoctoproject.org
I've updated the builds table information
(https://bugzilla.yoctoproject.org/attachment.cgi?id=1244)
By the way, what about the log question? It says:
In Hob, we create a build log file. Should we do the same in Web Hob?
Thanks!
Belen
On 06/06/2013 12:38, "Barros Pena, Belen" <belen.barros.pena@intel.com>
wrote:
>
>
>On 06/06/2013 09:51, "Dragomir, CalinX L" <calinx.l.dragomir@intel.com>
>wrote:
>
>>One of my ARs is to give feedback to Belen on the table
>>listed in 4249 bug.
>>
>>Overall, the information extracted in the table looks OK to me.
>>
>>Some minor observations:
>>* First about how we store time in table. I see that for "Started on" /
>>"Completed on" rows that the value is marked as timestamp while on Time
>>this is marked as HH:MM:SS .
>>The way I stored it in my test tables was as the time in seconds since
>>the epoch, as a floating point number, but I think you'd now expect
>>things differently, is this right ?
>>What should the format of these rows (Time / Started On / Completed On)
>>be? Seconds as floating point number or HH:MM:SS format ?
>
>So, "Started on" is supposed to tell you the date and time you started the
>build, and "Completed on" is supposed to tell you the date and time the
>build finished. So the format will be something like:
>
>DD/MM/YY + " at " HH:MM
>
>Where:
>
>DD is the day of the month using 2 characters (e.g. For today, 06)
>MM is the month using 2 characters (e.g. For today, 06)
>YY is the year using 2 characters (e.g. For today, 13)
>HH is the hour in 24-hour format (e.g. 16 for 4pm)
>MM is the minutes (e.g. 08)
>
>So a build that started / completed on June 6th at 4:08pm will show as
>"06/06/13 at 16:08"
>
>"Time" is how long the build took (i.e. The elapsed time between "Started
>on" and "Completed on"). Since we are talking about building targets,
>reporting in seconds makes little sense: they take too long. So we need to
>translate those seconds into something more human-readable (HH:MM:SS)
>where:
>
>HH is the number of hours
>MM is the number of minutes
>SS is the number of seconds
>
>This means the maximum Time value we can show is 99:60:60. If a build took
>longer than that, we'll need to display a message saying something like
>"way too long".
>
>If a build took less than one hour, we report '00' for the hours, like so
>00:35:18
>
>>
>>* Second, since we don't have anything to download yet, I don't think the
>>Output row is necessary for the moment.
>
>True, but we still need to tell people what the build produced (an iso
>file, for example) and where's located.
>
>>
>>We have the option of putting it in and leave it blank for the moment or
>>leave it out at this point and add it in the later stages of the WebHOB
>>project.
>
>We do need an 'Output' field for the above reasons, and it should not be
>blank, although instead of starting a download it could just open the
>/build/tmp/deploy directory, similarly to what Gtk Hob does.
>
>>
>>I would like to ask Alex, Paul or Richard to share their opinion on the
>>info in bug 4249 also, if possible.
>
>I'll add all the above to the table information document.
>
>>
>>Thanks,
>>Calin
>>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Intel Corporation (UK) Limited
Registered No. 1134945 (England)
Registered Office: Pipers Way, Swindon SN3 1RJ
VAT No: 860 2173 47
This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for
the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or distribution
by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended
recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread