From: Brian Norris <computersforpeace@gmail.com>
To: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Cc: Simon Horman <horms@verge.net.au>,
Linux-sh list <linux-sh@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
Magnus Damm <magnus.damm@gmail.com>,
Vladimir Barinov <vladimir.barinov@cogentembedded.com>,
Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@cogentembedded.com>,
linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org,
Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@osg.samsung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] ARM: shmobile: alt: Add QSPI device to DT
Date: Mon, 4 Jan 2016 13:25:15 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160104212515.GA39910@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAMuHMdWbFHLKgkn9ShJkyyimpwJAbbL5TjqEp1E9GBteVKQmKg@mail.gmail.com>
On Mon, Jan 04, 2016 at 09:42:59PM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 4, 2016 at 9:31 PM, Simon Horman <horms@verge.net.au> wrote:
> > Should we document "spansion,s25fl512s" for the benefit of checkpatch.pl?
>
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mtd/jedec,spi-nor.txt used to point to
> drivers/mtd/devices/m25p80.c for the list of supported chips.
>
> That seems to have been changed lately. Now jedec,spi-nor.txt includes the
> list, but lacks the manufacturers' names, so checkpatch.pl is still not happpy.
>
> Brian: Shouldn't the manufacturers's names be added?
We've had some of this discussion recently:
http://lkml.kernel.org/g/20151118194340.GF140057@google.com
I don't think we can reasonably determine a good list of complete
strings, due to historical failures (IMO) in the SPI subsystem. We could
add a separate list of possible manufacturers, so people can do the MxN
pairing themselves.
checkpatch.pl has enough false positives that its author doesn't care to
fix that I'm not personally worried about yet another class of them. But
if you have good reasons and good patches for the documentation, I'm all
ears.
Regards,
Brian
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Brian Norris <computersforpeace@gmail.com>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] ARM: shmobile: alt: Add QSPI device to DT
Date: Mon, 04 Jan 2016 21:25:15 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160104212515.GA39910@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAMuHMdWbFHLKgkn9ShJkyyimpwJAbbL5TjqEp1E9GBteVKQmKg@mail.gmail.com>
On Mon, Jan 04, 2016 at 09:42:59PM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 4, 2016 at 9:31 PM, Simon Horman <horms@verge.net.au> wrote:
> > Should we document "spansion,s25fl512s" for the benefit of checkpatch.pl?
>
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mtd/jedec,spi-nor.txt used to point to
> drivers/mtd/devices/m25p80.c for the list of supported chips.
>
> That seems to have been changed lately. Now jedec,spi-nor.txt includes the
> list, but lacks the manufacturers' names, so checkpatch.pl is still not happpy.
>
> Brian: Shouldn't the manufacturers's names be added?
We've had some of this discussion recently:
http://lkml.kernel.org/g/20151118194340.GF140057@google.com
I don't think we can reasonably determine a good list of complete
strings, due to historical failures (IMO) in the SPI subsystem. We could
add a separate list of possible manufacturers, so people can do the MxN
pairing themselves.
checkpatch.pl has enough false positives that its author doesn't care to
fix that I'm not personally worried about yet another class of them. But
if you have good reasons and good patches for the documentation, I'm all
ears.
Regards,
Brian
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: computersforpeace@gmail.com (Brian Norris)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v2] ARM: shmobile: alt: Add QSPI device to DT
Date: Mon, 4 Jan 2016 13:25:15 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160104212515.GA39910@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAMuHMdWbFHLKgkn9ShJkyyimpwJAbbL5TjqEp1E9GBteVKQmKg@mail.gmail.com>
On Mon, Jan 04, 2016 at 09:42:59PM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 4, 2016 at 9:31 PM, Simon Horman <horms@verge.net.au> wrote:
> > Should we document "spansion,s25fl512s" for the benefit of checkpatch.pl?
>
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mtd/jedec,spi-nor.txt used to point to
> drivers/mtd/devices/m25p80.c for the list of supported chips.
>
> That seems to have been changed lately. Now jedec,spi-nor.txt includes the
> list, but lacks the manufacturers' names, so checkpatch.pl is still not happpy.
>
> Brian: Shouldn't the manufacturers's names be added?
We've had some of this discussion recently:
http://lkml.kernel.org/g/20151118194340.GF140057 at google.com
I don't think we can reasonably determine a good list of complete
strings, due to historical failures (IMO) in the SPI subsystem. We could
add a separate list of possible manufacturers, so people can do the MxN
pairing themselves.
checkpatch.pl has enough false positives that its author doesn't care to
fix that I'm not personally worried about yet another class of them. But
if you have good reasons and good patches for the documentation, I'm all
ears.
Regards,
Brian
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-01-04 21:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-01-04 10:36 [PATCH v2] ARM: shmobile: alt: Add QSPI device to DT Simon Horman
2016-01-04 10:36 ` Simon Horman
2016-01-04 11:15 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2016-01-04 11:15 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2016-01-04 20:31 ` Simon Horman
2016-01-04 20:31 ` Simon Horman
2016-01-04 20:42 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2016-01-04 20:42 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2016-01-04 21:25 ` Brian Norris [this message]
2016-01-04 21:25 ` Brian Norris
2016-01-04 21:25 ` Brian Norris
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160104212515.GA39910@google.com \
--to=computersforpeace@gmail.com \
--cc=geert@linux-m68k.org \
--cc=horms@verge.net.au \
--cc=javier@osg.samsung.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-sh@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=magnus.damm@gmail.com \
--cc=sergei.shtylyov@cogentembedded.com \
--cc=vladimir.barinov@cogentembedded.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.