From: Guillaume Nault <g.nault@alphalink.fr>
To: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-ppp@vger.kernel.org, paulus@samba.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] ppp: add netlink support
Date: Tue, 05 Jan 2016 19:20:06 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160105192006.GO18510@alphalink.fr> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160105.141534.858084676889078948.davem@davemloft.net>
On Tue, Jan 05, 2016 at 02:15:34PM -0500, David Miller wrote:
> From: Guillaume Nault <g.nault@alphalink.fr>
> Date: Tue, 5 Jan 2016 19:10:20 +0100
>
> > On Wed, Dec 23, 2015 at 09:04:46PM +0100, Guillaume Nault wrote:
> >> This series adds netlink support for creating PPP devices.
> >>
> > Any feedback on this series? I can see that it has been marked
> > "Deferred" in patchwork, so I'm unsure about what to do with this patch
> > set now.
> > Should I repost later (e.g. after the end of the merge window)? Are
> > there any concern/issues with the series itself? Or should the idea of
> > implementing netlink handlers for ppp devices be entirely dropped?
>
> Repost it again later, I want more people to see and review this
> series and the holidays is not a good time for that...
Sure. Thanks for the feedback.
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Guillaume Nault <g.nault@alphalink.fr>
To: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-ppp@vger.kernel.org, paulus@samba.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] ppp: add netlink support
Date: Tue, 5 Jan 2016 20:20:06 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160105192006.GO18510@alphalink.fr> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160105.141534.858084676889078948.davem@davemloft.net>
On Tue, Jan 05, 2016 at 02:15:34PM -0500, David Miller wrote:
> From: Guillaume Nault <g.nault@alphalink.fr>
> Date: Tue, 5 Jan 2016 19:10:20 +0100
>
> > On Wed, Dec 23, 2015 at 09:04:46PM +0100, Guillaume Nault wrote:
> >> This series adds netlink support for creating PPP devices.
> >>
> > Any feedback on this series? I can see that it has been marked
> > "Deferred" in patchwork, so I'm unsure about what to do with this patch
> > set now.
> > Should I repost later (e.g. after the end of the merge window)? Are
> > there any concern/issues with the series itself? Or should the idea of
> > implementing netlink handlers for ppp devices be entirely dropped?
>
> Repost it again later, I want more people to see and review this
> series and the holidays is not a good time for that...
Sure. Thanks for the feedback.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-01-05 19:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-12-23 20:04 [PATCH 0/2] ppp: add netlink support Guillaume Nault
2015-12-23 20:04 ` Guillaume Nault
2015-12-23 20:04 ` [PATCH 1/2] ppp: define reusable device creation functions Guillaume Nault
2015-12-23 20:04 ` Guillaume Nault
2015-12-23 20:04 ` [PATCH 2/2] ppp: implement rtnetlink device handling Guillaume Nault
2015-12-23 20:04 ` Guillaume Nault
2016-01-25 11:09 ` walter harms
2016-01-25 11:09 ` walter harms
2016-01-25 15:28 ` Guillaume Nault
2016-01-25 15:28 ` Guillaume Nault
2015-12-23 20:09 ` [PATCH 0/2] ppp: add netlink support Guillaume Nault
2015-12-23 20:09 ` Guillaume Nault
2016-01-05 18:10 ` Guillaume Nault
2016-01-05 18:10 ` Guillaume Nault
2016-01-05 19:15 ` David Miller
2016-01-05 19:15 ` David Miller
2016-01-05 19:20 ` Guillaume Nault [this message]
2016-01-05 19:20 ` Guillaume Nault
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160105192006.GO18510@alphalink.fr \
--to=g.nault@alphalink.fr \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=linux-ppp@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.