[PATCH] dmaengine: xgene-dma: Fix double IRQ issue by setting IRQ_DISABLE_UNLAZY flag

[vinod.koul@intel.com (Vinod Koul)]

On Wed, Jan 06, 2016 at 02:51:07PM +0530, Rameshwar Sahu wrote:
> Hi Vinod,
> 
> On Wed, Jan 6, 2016 at 2:43 PM, Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@intel.com> wrote:
> > On Wed, Dec 23, 2015 at 06:28:15PM +0530, Rameshswar Prasad Sahu wrote:
> >> From: Rameshwar Prasad Sahu <rsahu@apm.com>
> >>
> >> For interrupt controller that doesn't support irq_disable and hardware
> >> with level interrupt, an extra interrupt can be pending. This patch fixes
> >> the issue by setting IRQ_DISABLE_UNLAZY flag for the interrupt line.
> >>
> >> Reference: http://git.kernel.org/tip/e9849777d0e27cdd2902805be51da73e7c79578c
> >
> > I seem to have got this patch thrice :(
> Due to mail failure (some issue was in my email client) to some
> email-id it was multiple times,

git send-email ?

> >
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Rameshwar Prasad Sahu <rsahu@apm.com>
> >> ---
> >>  drivers/dma/xgene-dma.c |    4 ++++
> >>  1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/drivers/dma/xgene-dma.c b/drivers/dma/xgene-dma.c
> >> index 9dfa2b0..6363e84 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/dma/xgene-dma.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/dma/xgene-dma.c
> >> @@ -29,6 +29,7 @@
> >>  #include <linux/dmapool.h>
> >>  #include <linux/interrupt.h>
> >>  #include <linux/io.h>
> >> +#include <linux/irq.h>
> >>  #include <linux/module.h>
> >>  #include <linux/of_device.h>
> >>
> >> @@ -1610,6 +1611,7 @@ static int xgene_dma_request_irqs(struct xgene_dma *pdma)
> >>       /* Register DMA channel rx irq */
> >>       for (i = 0; i < XGENE_DMA_MAX_CHANNEL; i++) {
> >>               chan = &pdma->chan[i];
> >> +             irq_set_status_flags(chan->rx_irq, IRQ_DISABLE_UNLAZY);
> >
> > Why not use irq_settings_disable_unlazy(), at least read the reference you
> > pointed out!
> 
> irq_settings_disable_unlazy() is helper function to test
> IRQ_DISABLE_UNLAZY flag is set or not, it's not for setting this flag.
> FYI...
> +static inline bool irq_settings_disable_unlazy(struct irq_desc *desc)
> +{
> + return desc->status_use_accessors & _IRQ_DISABLE_UNLAZY;
> +}

Ah yes, I saw clear API and assumed there would be set. Then I think we
should add a set helper as well as the usage is intended for drivers to
set this flag

Thomas,

Any reason why you didn't add a set helper, only test and clear?

-- 
~Vinod