From: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: lkp@lists.01.org
Subject: Re: [rcu] b8084f70e0: No primary result change, 1414.7% unixbench.time.involuntary_context_switches
Date: Wed, 06 Jan 2016 08:00:35 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160106160035.GJ3818@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <871t9vfi5o.fsf@yhuang-dev.intel.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 14383 bytes --]
On Wed, Jan 06, 2016 at 12:25:55PM +0800, Huang, Ying wrote:
> "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> writes:
>
> > On Wed, Jan 06, 2016 at 10:47:43AM +0800, kernel test robot wrote:
> >> FYI, we noticed the below changes on
> >>
> >> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rt/linux-rt-devel.git for-kbuild-bot/current-stable
> >> commit b8084f70e028697b342d6388b244d6171717fc54 ("rcu: Eliminate softirq processing from rcutree")
> >
> > This is a performance degradation, correct? If so, looks like this commit
> > is not ready for mainline unless set up to be configured on only for
> > -rt workloads.
>
> Yes. This is a performance degradation.
Thank you!
> > Or am I missing the plot somewhere here?
>
> Which plot?
Apologies, that was American slang, not so appropriate for this audience.
I am asking the -rt guys if there is some problem with adjusting the
patch so that it eliminates softirq only when the kernel is specifically
build/booted for -rt.
Thanx, Paul
> Best Regards,
> Huang, Ying
>
> > Thanx, Paul
> >
> >> =========================================================================================
> >> compiler/cpufreq_governor/kconfig/nr_task/rootfs/tbox_group/test/testcase:
> >> gcc-4.9/performance/x86_64-rhel/1/debian-x86_64-2015-02-07.cgz/lkp-ivb-d02/fsbuffer/unixbench
> >>
> >> commit:
> >> ee644236a506642e20637f954d286f49a76ed83a
> >> b8084f70e028697b342d6388b244d6171717fc54
> >>
> >> ee644236a506642e b8084f70e028697b342d6388b2
> >> ---------------- --------------------------
> >> %stddev %change %stddev
> >> \ | \
> >> 257.25 18% +1414.7% 3896 13% unixbench.time.involuntary_context_switches
> >> 4425148 22% -61.9% 1684712 29% cpuidle.C1E-IVB.time
> >> 83.75 48% +91.6% 160.50 31% cpuidle.POLL.usage
> >> 1902 7% -12.0% 1674 1% slabinfo.anon_vma.active_objs
> >> 1902 7% -12.0% 1674 1% slabinfo.anon_vma.num_objs
> >> 257.25 18% +1414.7% 3896 13% time.involuntary_context_switches
> >> 8.15 6% -14.1% 7.00 1% time.user_time
> >> 34345 14% -33.3% 22908 33% sched_debug.cfs_rq:/.exec_clock.2
> >> 34987 13% -19.7% 28093 15% sched_debug.cfs_rq:/.exec_clock.max
> >> 642.75 5% +59.6% 1025 55% sched_debug.cfs_rq:/.exec_clock.min
> >> 14639 13% -21.8% 11443 16% sched_debug.cfs_rq:/.exec_clock.stddev
> >> 127.75 16% -26.2% 94.25 25% sched_debug.cfs_rq:/.load_avg.3
> >> 38865 12% -36.0% 24885 34% sched_debug.cfs_rq:/.min_vruntime.2
> >> 39385 12% -22.8% 30395 16% sched_debug.cfs_rq:/.min_vruntime.max
> >> 1090 11% +45.3% 1584 32% sched_debug.cfs_rq:/.min_vruntime.min
> >> 16286 13% -25.1% 12200 18% sched_debug.cfs_rq:/.min_vruntime.stddev
> >> 2.00 0% -50.0% 1.00 0% sched_debug.cfs_rq:/.nr_spread_over.0
> >> 2.00 0% -50.0% 1.00 0% sched_debug.cfs_rq:/.nr_spread_over.max
> >> 0.87 0% -42.3% 0.50 0% sched_debug.cfs_rq:/.nr_spread_over.stddev
> >> 28.50 62% +338.6% 125.00 114% sched_debug.cfs_rq:/.runnable_load_avg.1
> >> 16286 13% -25.1% 12200 18% sched_debug.cfs_rq:/.spread0.stddev
> >> 127.75 16% -26.0% 94.50 25% sched_debug.cfs_rq:/.tg_load_avg_contrib.3
> >> 626662 5% -13.2% 544121 9% sched_debug.cpu.avg_idle.0
> >> 20.25 28% +419.8% 105.25 132% sched_debug.cpu.cpu_load[3].1
> >> 692.40 7% -15.2% 586.96 9% sched_debug.cpu.curr->pid.avg
> >> 36187 12% -31.5% 24793 29% sched_debug.cpu.nr_load_updates.2
> >> 15625 11% +61.6% 25245 23% sched_debug.cpu.nr_switches.0
> >> 20008 4% +14.1% 22828 4% sched_debug.cpu.nr_switches.avg
> >> 23333 8% +40.9% 32872 18% sched_debug.cpu.sched_count.0
> >> 21974 4% +12.7% 24771 4% sched_debug.cpu.sched_count.avg
> >> 31771 9% +22.6% 38942 5% sched_debug.cpu.sched_count.max
> >> 9514 28% +75.8% 16728 7% sched_debug.cpu.ttwu_count.0
> >> 4323 10% +40.6% 6080 30% sched_debug.cpu.ttwu_count.2
> >> 10068 4% +15.6% 11639 4% sched_debug.cpu.ttwu_count.avg
> >> 4101 10% +21.7% 4990 8% sched_debug.cpu.ttwu_count.min
> >> 3676 21% +102.5% 7443 8% sched_debug.cpu.ttwu_local.0
> >> 2014 15% +43.2% 2884 10% sched_debug.cpu.ttwu_local.2
> >> 3508 1% +24.8% 4377 4% sched_debug.cpu.ttwu_local.avg
> >> 5554 19% +34.0% 7444 8% sched_debug.cpu.ttwu_local.max
> >> 1846 16% +40.2% 2588 6% sched_debug.cpu.ttwu_local.min
> >>
> >> =========================================================================================
> >> compiler/cpufreq_governor/kconfig/nr_task/rootfs/tbox_group/test/testcase:
> >> gcc-4.9/performance/x86_64-rhel/1/debian-x86_64-2015-02-07.cgz/lkp-ivb-d02/fsdisk/unixbench
> >>
> >> commit:
> >> ee644236a506642e20637f954d286f49a76ed83a
> >> b8084f70e028697b342d6388b244d6171717fc54
> >>
> >> ee644236a506642e b8084f70e028697b342d6388b2
> >> ---------------- --------------------------
> >> fail:runs %reproduction fail:runs
> >> | | |
> >> :4 25% 1:4 kmsg.DHCP/BOOTP:Reply_not_for_us,op[#]xid[#]
> >> %stddev %change %stddev
> >> \ | \
> >> 265.75 18% +1313.4% 3756 9% unixbench.time.involuntary_context_switches
> >> 659.50 6% +16.5% 768.00 7% slabinfo.kmalloc-512.num_objs
> >> 265.75 18% +1313.4% 3756 9% time.involuntary_context_switches
> >> 5911312 13% -55.9% 2606719 10% cpuidle.C1E-IVB.time
> >> 95195 172% +815.7% 871684 140% cpuidle.POLL.time
> >> 51.75 10% -30.9% 35.75 24% cpuidle.POLL.usage
> >> 13361 22% -27.0% 9754 4% sched_debug.cfs_rq:/.exec_clock.stddev
> >> 14632 24% -28.1% 10524 5% sched_debug.cfs_rq:/.min_vruntime.stddev
> >> 14632 24% -28.1% 10524 5% sched_debug.cfs_rq:/.spread0.stddev
> >> 197.25 14% +52.9% 301.50 41% sched_debug.cfs_rq:/.util_avg.0
> >> 552666 8% -7.7% 510200 7% sched_debug.cpu.avg_idle.1
> >> 13610 30% +59.7% 21734 7% sched_debug.cpu.nr_switches.0
> >> 21145 1% +12.3% 23752 7% sched_debug.cpu.nr_switches.avg
> >> 10105 21% +62.1% 16380 7% sched_debug.cpu.nr_switches.min
> >> 11293 28% -44.4% 6276 16% sched_debug.cpu.nr_switches.stddev
> >> 21314 19% +38.1% 29437 5% sched_debug.cpu.sched_count.0
> >> 11261 22% +57.2% 17703 9% sched_debug.cpu.sched_count.min
> >> 11158 27% -36.7% 7068 12% sched_debug.cpu.sched_count.stddev
> >> 5854 35% +57.0% 9194 8% sched_debug.cpu.sched_goidle.0
> >> 3713 27% +68.4% 6253 11% sched_debug.cpu.sched_goidle.min
> >> 5638 29% -44.5% 3131 18% sched_debug.cpu.sched_goidle.stddev
> >> 8286 32% +85.0% 15333 15% sched_debug.cpu.ttwu_count.0
> >> 10697 1% +13.2% 12107 7% sched_debug.cpu.ttwu_count.avg
> >> 4845 5% +17.8% 5707 8% sched_debug.cpu.ttwu_count.min
> >> 2886 47% +105.5% 5931 16% sched_debug.cpu.ttwu_local.0
> >> 3667 3% +17.0% 4291 1% sched_debug.cpu.ttwu_local.avg
> >> 2127 17% +29.2% 2748 7% sched_debug.cpu.ttwu_local.min
> >>
> >>
> >> lkp-ivb-d02: Ivy Bridge
> >> Memory: 8G
> >>
> >> unixbench.time.involuntary_context_switches
> >>
> >> 5000 ++-------------------------------------------------------------------+
> >> 4500 O+ |
> >> | O O O O O
> >> 4000 ++ O O O |
> >> 3500 ++O O O O O O O O O O O |
> >> | O O O |
> >> 3000 ++ O O |
> >> 2500 ++ |
> >> 2000 ++ |
> >> | |
> >> 1500 ++ |
> >> 1000 ++ |
> >> |.*.. .*.. .*. .*.*.. .*.. |
> >> 500 *+ * *.*..*.*. *. .*.. .*.*..* *.*..*.* |
> >> 0 ++----------O---------O-------*----*------O----O---------------------+
> >>
> >> [*] bisect-good sample
> >> [O] bisect-bad sample
> >>
> >> To reproduce:
> >>
> >> git clone git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/wfg/lkp-tests.git
> >> cd lkp-tests
> >> bin/lkp install job.yaml # job file is attached in this email
> >> bin/lkp run job.yaml
> >>
> >>
> >> Disclaimer:
> >> Results have been estimated based on internal Intel analysis and are provided
> >> for informational purposes only. Any difference in system hardware or software
> >> design or configuration may affect actual performance.
> >>
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >> Ying Huang
> >
> >> ---
> >> LKP_SERVER: inn
> >> LKP_CGI_PORT: 80
> >> LKP_CIFS_PORT: 139
> >> testcase: unixbench
> >> default-monitors:
> >> wait: activate-monitor
> >> kmsg:
> >> uptime:
> >> iostat:
> >> vmstat:
> >> numa-numastat:
> >> numa-vmstat:
> >> numa-meminfo:
> >> proc-vmstat:
> >> proc-stat:
> >> interval: 10
> >> meminfo:
> >> slabinfo:
> >> interrupts:
> >> lock_stat:
> >> latency_stats:
> >> softirqs:
> >> bdi_dev_mapping:
> >> diskstats:
> >> nfsstat:
> >> cpuidle:
> >> cpufreq-stats:
> >> turbostat:
> >> pmeter:
> >> sched_debug:
> >> interval: 60
> >> cpufreq_governor: performance
> >> default-watchdogs:
> >> oom-killer:
> >> watchdog:
> >> commit: b8084f70e028697b342d6388b244d6171717fc54
> >> model: Ivy Bridge
> >> nr_cpu: 4
> >> memory: 8G
> >> nr_hdd_partitions: 1
> >> hdd_partitions: "/dev/disk/by-id/ata-ST1000DM003-1CH162_Z1DBQSB0-part1"
> >> swap_partitions: "/dev/disk/by-id/ata-ST1000DM003-1CH162_Z1DBQSB0-part3"
> >> rootfs_partition: "/dev/disk/by-id/ata-ST1000DM003-1CH162_Z1DBQSB0-part4"
> >> netconsole_port: 66723
> >> category: benchmark
> >> nr_task: 1
> >> unixbench:
> >> test: fsdisk
> >> queue: bisect
> >> testbox: lkp-ivb-d02
> >> tbox_group: lkp-ivb-d02
> >> kconfig: x86_64-rhel
> >> enqueue_time: 2016-01-05 16:24:11.468660360 +08:00
> >> id: 62c43434378ef50b95fcd4973759daf66a148734
> >> user: lkp
> >> compiler: gcc-4.9
> >> head_commit: 5bae791e5bb8895ac3d65634231c99d79a0e0002
> >> base_commit: 168309855a7d1e16db751e9c647119fe2d2dc878
> >> branch: linux-devel/devel-hourly-2016010502
> >> rootfs: debian-x86_64-2015-02-07.cgz
> >> result_root: "/result/unixbench/performance-1-fsdisk/lkp-ivb-d02/debian-x86_64-2015-02-07.cgz/x86_64-rhel/gcc-4.9/b8084f70e028697b342d6388b244d6171717fc54/0"
> >> job_file: "/lkp/scheduled/lkp-ivb-d02/bisect_unixbench-performance-1-fsdisk-debian-x86_64-2015-02-07.cgz-x86_64-rhel-b8084f70e028697b342d6388b244d6171717fc54-20160105-89027-193oala-0.yaml"
> >> max_uptime: 922.0999999999999
> >> initrd: "/osimage/debian/debian-x86_64-2015-02-07.cgz"
> >> bootloader_append:
> >> - root=/dev/ram0
> >> - user=lkp
> >> - job=/lkp/scheduled/lkp-ivb-d02/bisect_unixbench-performance-1-fsdisk-debian-x86_64-2015-02-07.cgz-x86_64-rhel-b8084f70e028697b342d6388b244d6171717fc54-20160105-89027-193oala-0.yaml
> >> - ARCH=x86_64
> >> - kconfig=x86_64-rhel
> >> - branch=linux-devel/devel-hourly-2016010502
> >> - commit=b8084f70e028697b342d6388b244d6171717fc54
> >> - BOOT_IMAGE=/pkg/linux/x86_64-rhel/gcc-4.9/b8084f70e028697b342d6388b244d6171717fc54/vmlinuz-4.4.0-rc6-00236-gb8084f7
> >> - max_uptime=922
> >> - RESULT_ROOT=/result/unixbench/performance-1-fsdisk/lkp-ivb-d02/debian-x86_64-2015-02-07.cgz/x86_64-rhel/gcc-4.9/b8084f70e028697b342d6388b244d6171717fc54/0
> >> - LKP_SERVER=inn
> >> - |2-
> >>
> >>
> >> earlyprintk=ttyS0,115200 systemd.log_level=err
> >> debug apic=debug sysrq_always_enabled rcupdate.rcu_cpu_stall_timeout=100
> >> panic=-1 softlockup_panic=1 nmi_watchdog=panic oops=panic load_ramdisk=2 prompt_ramdisk=0
> >> console=ttyS0,115200 console=tty0 vga=normal
> >>
> >> rw
> >> lkp_initrd: "/lkp/lkp/lkp-x86_64.cgz"
> >> modules_initrd: "/pkg/linux/x86_64-rhel/gcc-4.9/b8084f70e028697b342d6388b244d6171717fc54/modules.cgz"
> >> bm_initrd: "/osimage/deps/debian-x86_64-2015-02-07.cgz/lkp.cgz,/osimage/deps/debian-x86_64-2015-02-07.cgz/run-ipconfig.cgz,/osimage/deps/debian-x86_64-2015-02-07.cgz/turbostat.cgz,/lkp/benchmarks/turbostat.cgz,/lkp/benchmarks/unixbench.cgz"
> >> linux_headers_initrd: "/pkg/linux/x86_64-rhel/gcc-4.9/b8084f70e028697b342d6388b244d6171717fc54/linux-headers.cgz"
> >> repeat_to: 2
> >> kernel: "/pkg/linux/x86_64-rhel/gcc-4.9/b8084f70e028697b342d6388b244d6171717fc54/vmlinuz-4.4.0-rc6-00236-gb8084f7"
> >> dequeue_time: 2016-01-05 16:39:47.706440461 +08:00
> >> job_state: finished
> >> loadavg: 0.58 0.25 0.10 1/123 2689
> >> start_time: '1451983209'
> >> end_time: '1451983353'
> >> version: "/lkp/lkp/.src-20160105-162125"
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > LKP mailing list
> > LKP(a)lists.01.org
> > https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/lkp
>
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: "Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@intel.com>
Cc: Mike Galbraith <bitbucket@online.de>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
lkp@01.org, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Subject: Re: [LKP] [lkp] [rcu] b8084f70e0: No primary result change, 1414.7% unixbench.time.involuntary_context_switches
Date: Wed, 6 Jan 2016 08:00:35 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160106160035.GJ3818@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <871t9vfi5o.fsf@yhuang-dev.intel.com>
On Wed, Jan 06, 2016 at 12:25:55PM +0800, Huang, Ying wrote:
> "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> writes:
>
> > On Wed, Jan 06, 2016 at 10:47:43AM +0800, kernel test robot wrote:
> >> FYI, we noticed the below changes on
> >>
> >> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rt/linux-rt-devel.git for-kbuild-bot/current-stable
> >> commit b8084f70e028697b342d6388b244d6171717fc54 ("rcu: Eliminate softirq processing from rcutree")
> >
> > This is a performance degradation, correct? If so, looks like this commit
> > is not ready for mainline unless set up to be configured on only for
> > -rt workloads.
>
> Yes. This is a performance degradation.
Thank you!
> > Or am I missing the plot somewhere here?
>
> Which plot?
Apologies, that was American slang, not so appropriate for this audience.
I am asking the -rt guys if there is some problem with adjusting the
patch so that it eliminates softirq only when the kernel is specifically
build/booted for -rt.
Thanx, Paul
> Best Regards,
> Huang, Ying
>
> > Thanx, Paul
> >
> >> =========================================================================================
> >> compiler/cpufreq_governor/kconfig/nr_task/rootfs/tbox_group/test/testcase:
> >> gcc-4.9/performance/x86_64-rhel/1/debian-x86_64-2015-02-07.cgz/lkp-ivb-d02/fsbuffer/unixbench
> >>
> >> commit:
> >> ee644236a506642e20637f954d286f49a76ed83a
> >> b8084f70e028697b342d6388b244d6171717fc54
> >>
> >> ee644236a506642e b8084f70e028697b342d6388b2
> >> ---------------- --------------------------
> >> %stddev %change %stddev
> >> \ | \
> >> 257.25 18% +1414.7% 3896 13% unixbench.time.involuntary_context_switches
> >> 4425148 22% -61.9% 1684712 29% cpuidle.C1E-IVB.time
> >> 83.75 48% +91.6% 160.50 31% cpuidle.POLL.usage
> >> 1902 7% -12.0% 1674 1% slabinfo.anon_vma.active_objs
> >> 1902 7% -12.0% 1674 1% slabinfo.anon_vma.num_objs
> >> 257.25 18% +1414.7% 3896 13% time.involuntary_context_switches
> >> 8.15 6% -14.1% 7.00 1% time.user_time
> >> 34345 14% -33.3% 22908 33% sched_debug.cfs_rq:/.exec_clock.2
> >> 34987 13% -19.7% 28093 15% sched_debug.cfs_rq:/.exec_clock.max
> >> 642.75 5% +59.6% 1025 55% sched_debug.cfs_rq:/.exec_clock.min
> >> 14639 13% -21.8% 11443 16% sched_debug.cfs_rq:/.exec_clock.stddev
> >> 127.75 16% -26.2% 94.25 25% sched_debug.cfs_rq:/.load_avg.3
> >> 38865 12% -36.0% 24885 34% sched_debug.cfs_rq:/.min_vruntime.2
> >> 39385 12% -22.8% 30395 16% sched_debug.cfs_rq:/.min_vruntime.max
> >> 1090 11% +45.3% 1584 32% sched_debug.cfs_rq:/.min_vruntime.min
> >> 16286 13% -25.1% 12200 18% sched_debug.cfs_rq:/.min_vruntime.stddev
> >> 2.00 0% -50.0% 1.00 0% sched_debug.cfs_rq:/.nr_spread_over.0
> >> 2.00 0% -50.0% 1.00 0% sched_debug.cfs_rq:/.nr_spread_over.max
> >> 0.87 0% -42.3% 0.50 0% sched_debug.cfs_rq:/.nr_spread_over.stddev
> >> 28.50 62% +338.6% 125.00 114% sched_debug.cfs_rq:/.runnable_load_avg.1
> >> 16286 13% -25.1% 12200 18% sched_debug.cfs_rq:/.spread0.stddev
> >> 127.75 16% -26.0% 94.50 25% sched_debug.cfs_rq:/.tg_load_avg_contrib.3
> >> 626662 5% -13.2% 544121 9% sched_debug.cpu.avg_idle.0
> >> 20.25 28% +419.8% 105.25 132% sched_debug.cpu.cpu_load[3].1
> >> 692.40 7% -15.2% 586.96 9% sched_debug.cpu.curr->pid.avg
> >> 36187 12% -31.5% 24793 29% sched_debug.cpu.nr_load_updates.2
> >> 15625 11% +61.6% 25245 23% sched_debug.cpu.nr_switches.0
> >> 20008 4% +14.1% 22828 4% sched_debug.cpu.nr_switches.avg
> >> 23333 8% +40.9% 32872 18% sched_debug.cpu.sched_count.0
> >> 21974 4% +12.7% 24771 4% sched_debug.cpu.sched_count.avg
> >> 31771 9% +22.6% 38942 5% sched_debug.cpu.sched_count.max
> >> 9514 28% +75.8% 16728 7% sched_debug.cpu.ttwu_count.0
> >> 4323 10% +40.6% 6080 30% sched_debug.cpu.ttwu_count.2
> >> 10068 4% +15.6% 11639 4% sched_debug.cpu.ttwu_count.avg
> >> 4101 10% +21.7% 4990 8% sched_debug.cpu.ttwu_count.min
> >> 3676 21% +102.5% 7443 8% sched_debug.cpu.ttwu_local.0
> >> 2014 15% +43.2% 2884 10% sched_debug.cpu.ttwu_local.2
> >> 3508 1% +24.8% 4377 4% sched_debug.cpu.ttwu_local.avg
> >> 5554 19% +34.0% 7444 8% sched_debug.cpu.ttwu_local.max
> >> 1846 16% +40.2% 2588 6% sched_debug.cpu.ttwu_local.min
> >>
> >> =========================================================================================
> >> compiler/cpufreq_governor/kconfig/nr_task/rootfs/tbox_group/test/testcase:
> >> gcc-4.9/performance/x86_64-rhel/1/debian-x86_64-2015-02-07.cgz/lkp-ivb-d02/fsdisk/unixbench
> >>
> >> commit:
> >> ee644236a506642e20637f954d286f49a76ed83a
> >> b8084f70e028697b342d6388b244d6171717fc54
> >>
> >> ee644236a506642e b8084f70e028697b342d6388b2
> >> ---------------- --------------------------
> >> fail:runs %reproduction fail:runs
> >> | | |
> >> :4 25% 1:4 kmsg.DHCP/BOOTP:Reply_not_for_us,op[#]xid[#]
> >> %stddev %change %stddev
> >> \ | \
> >> 265.75 18% +1313.4% 3756 9% unixbench.time.involuntary_context_switches
> >> 659.50 6% +16.5% 768.00 7% slabinfo.kmalloc-512.num_objs
> >> 265.75 18% +1313.4% 3756 9% time.involuntary_context_switches
> >> 5911312 13% -55.9% 2606719 10% cpuidle.C1E-IVB.time
> >> 95195 172% +815.7% 871684 140% cpuidle.POLL.time
> >> 51.75 10% -30.9% 35.75 24% cpuidle.POLL.usage
> >> 13361 22% -27.0% 9754 4% sched_debug.cfs_rq:/.exec_clock.stddev
> >> 14632 24% -28.1% 10524 5% sched_debug.cfs_rq:/.min_vruntime.stddev
> >> 14632 24% -28.1% 10524 5% sched_debug.cfs_rq:/.spread0.stddev
> >> 197.25 14% +52.9% 301.50 41% sched_debug.cfs_rq:/.util_avg.0
> >> 552666 8% -7.7% 510200 7% sched_debug.cpu.avg_idle.1
> >> 13610 30% +59.7% 21734 7% sched_debug.cpu.nr_switches.0
> >> 21145 1% +12.3% 23752 7% sched_debug.cpu.nr_switches.avg
> >> 10105 21% +62.1% 16380 7% sched_debug.cpu.nr_switches.min
> >> 11293 28% -44.4% 6276 16% sched_debug.cpu.nr_switches.stddev
> >> 21314 19% +38.1% 29437 5% sched_debug.cpu.sched_count.0
> >> 11261 22% +57.2% 17703 9% sched_debug.cpu.sched_count.min
> >> 11158 27% -36.7% 7068 12% sched_debug.cpu.sched_count.stddev
> >> 5854 35% +57.0% 9194 8% sched_debug.cpu.sched_goidle.0
> >> 3713 27% +68.4% 6253 11% sched_debug.cpu.sched_goidle.min
> >> 5638 29% -44.5% 3131 18% sched_debug.cpu.sched_goidle.stddev
> >> 8286 32% +85.0% 15333 15% sched_debug.cpu.ttwu_count.0
> >> 10697 1% +13.2% 12107 7% sched_debug.cpu.ttwu_count.avg
> >> 4845 5% +17.8% 5707 8% sched_debug.cpu.ttwu_count.min
> >> 2886 47% +105.5% 5931 16% sched_debug.cpu.ttwu_local.0
> >> 3667 3% +17.0% 4291 1% sched_debug.cpu.ttwu_local.avg
> >> 2127 17% +29.2% 2748 7% sched_debug.cpu.ttwu_local.min
> >>
> >>
> >> lkp-ivb-d02: Ivy Bridge
> >> Memory: 8G
> >>
> >> unixbench.time.involuntary_context_switches
> >>
> >> 5000 ++-------------------------------------------------------------------+
> >> 4500 O+ |
> >> | O O O O O
> >> 4000 ++ O O O |
> >> 3500 ++O O O O O O O O O O O |
> >> | O O O |
> >> 3000 ++ O O |
> >> 2500 ++ |
> >> 2000 ++ |
> >> | |
> >> 1500 ++ |
> >> 1000 ++ |
> >> |.*.. .*.. .*. .*.*.. .*.. |
> >> 500 *+ * *.*..*.*. *. .*.. .*.*..* *.*..*.* |
> >> 0 ++----------O---------O-------*----*------O----O---------------------+
> >>
> >> [*] bisect-good sample
> >> [O] bisect-bad sample
> >>
> >> To reproduce:
> >>
> >> git clone git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/wfg/lkp-tests.git
> >> cd lkp-tests
> >> bin/lkp install job.yaml # job file is attached in this email
> >> bin/lkp run job.yaml
> >>
> >>
> >> Disclaimer:
> >> Results have been estimated based on internal Intel analysis and are provided
> >> for informational purposes only. Any difference in system hardware or software
> >> design or configuration may affect actual performance.
> >>
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >> Ying Huang
> >
> >> ---
> >> LKP_SERVER: inn
> >> LKP_CGI_PORT: 80
> >> LKP_CIFS_PORT: 139
> >> testcase: unixbench
> >> default-monitors:
> >> wait: activate-monitor
> >> kmsg:
> >> uptime:
> >> iostat:
> >> vmstat:
> >> numa-numastat:
> >> numa-vmstat:
> >> numa-meminfo:
> >> proc-vmstat:
> >> proc-stat:
> >> interval: 10
> >> meminfo:
> >> slabinfo:
> >> interrupts:
> >> lock_stat:
> >> latency_stats:
> >> softirqs:
> >> bdi_dev_mapping:
> >> diskstats:
> >> nfsstat:
> >> cpuidle:
> >> cpufreq-stats:
> >> turbostat:
> >> pmeter:
> >> sched_debug:
> >> interval: 60
> >> cpufreq_governor: performance
> >> default-watchdogs:
> >> oom-killer:
> >> watchdog:
> >> commit: b8084f70e028697b342d6388b244d6171717fc54
> >> model: Ivy Bridge
> >> nr_cpu: 4
> >> memory: 8G
> >> nr_hdd_partitions: 1
> >> hdd_partitions: "/dev/disk/by-id/ata-ST1000DM003-1CH162_Z1DBQSB0-part1"
> >> swap_partitions: "/dev/disk/by-id/ata-ST1000DM003-1CH162_Z1DBQSB0-part3"
> >> rootfs_partition: "/dev/disk/by-id/ata-ST1000DM003-1CH162_Z1DBQSB0-part4"
> >> netconsole_port: 66723
> >> category: benchmark
> >> nr_task: 1
> >> unixbench:
> >> test: fsdisk
> >> queue: bisect
> >> testbox: lkp-ivb-d02
> >> tbox_group: lkp-ivb-d02
> >> kconfig: x86_64-rhel
> >> enqueue_time: 2016-01-05 16:24:11.468660360 +08:00
> >> id: 62c43434378ef50b95fcd4973759daf66a148734
> >> user: lkp
> >> compiler: gcc-4.9
> >> head_commit: 5bae791e5bb8895ac3d65634231c99d79a0e0002
> >> base_commit: 168309855a7d1e16db751e9c647119fe2d2dc878
> >> branch: linux-devel/devel-hourly-2016010502
> >> rootfs: debian-x86_64-2015-02-07.cgz
> >> result_root: "/result/unixbench/performance-1-fsdisk/lkp-ivb-d02/debian-x86_64-2015-02-07.cgz/x86_64-rhel/gcc-4.9/b8084f70e028697b342d6388b244d6171717fc54/0"
> >> job_file: "/lkp/scheduled/lkp-ivb-d02/bisect_unixbench-performance-1-fsdisk-debian-x86_64-2015-02-07.cgz-x86_64-rhel-b8084f70e028697b342d6388b244d6171717fc54-20160105-89027-193oala-0.yaml"
> >> max_uptime: 922.0999999999999
> >> initrd: "/osimage/debian/debian-x86_64-2015-02-07.cgz"
> >> bootloader_append:
> >> - root=/dev/ram0
> >> - user=lkp
> >> - job=/lkp/scheduled/lkp-ivb-d02/bisect_unixbench-performance-1-fsdisk-debian-x86_64-2015-02-07.cgz-x86_64-rhel-b8084f70e028697b342d6388b244d6171717fc54-20160105-89027-193oala-0.yaml
> >> - ARCH=x86_64
> >> - kconfig=x86_64-rhel
> >> - branch=linux-devel/devel-hourly-2016010502
> >> - commit=b8084f70e028697b342d6388b244d6171717fc54
> >> - BOOT_IMAGE=/pkg/linux/x86_64-rhel/gcc-4.9/b8084f70e028697b342d6388b244d6171717fc54/vmlinuz-4.4.0-rc6-00236-gb8084f7
> >> - max_uptime=922
> >> - RESULT_ROOT=/result/unixbench/performance-1-fsdisk/lkp-ivb-d02/debian-x86_64-2015-02-07.cgz/x86_64-rhel/gcc-4.9/b8084f70e028697b342d6388b244d6171717fc54/0
> >> - LKP_SERVER=inn
> >> - |2-
> >>
> >>
> >> earlyprintk=ttyS0,115200 systemd.log_level=err
> >> debug apic=debug sysrq_always_enabled rcupdate.rcu_cpu_stall_timeout=100
> >> panic=-1 softlockup_panic=1 nmi_watchdog=panic oops=panic load_ramdisk=2 prompt_ramdisk=0
> >> console=ttyS0,115200 console=tty0 vga=normal
> >>
> >> rw
> >> lkp_initrd: "/lkp/lkp/lkp-x86_64.cgz"
> >> modules_initrd: "/pkg/linux/x86_64-rhel/gcc-4.9/b8084f70e028697b342d6388b244d6171717fc54/modules.cgz"
> >> bm_initrd: "/osimage/deps/debian-x86_64-2015-02-07.cgz/lkp.cgz,/osimage/deps/debian-x86_64-2015-02-07.cgz/run-ipconfig.cgz,/osimage/deps/debian-x86_64-2015-02-07.cgz/turbostat.cgz,/lkp/benchmarks/turbostat.cgz,/lkp/benchmarks/unixbench.cgz"
> >> linux_headers_initrd: "/pkg/linux/x86_64-rhel/gcc-4.9/b8084f70e028697b342d6388b244d6171717fc54/linux-headers.cgz"
> >> repeat_to: 2
> >> kernel: "/pkg/linux/x86_64-rhel/gcc-4.9/b8084f70e028697b342d6388b244d6171717fc54/vmlinuz-4.4.0-rc6-00236-gb8084f7"
> >> dequeue_time: 2016-01-05 16:39:47.706440461 +08:00
> >> job_state: finished
> >> loadavg: 0.58 0.25 0.10 1/123 2689
> >> start_time: '1451983209'
> >> end_time: '1451983353'
> >> version: "/lkp/lkp/.src-20160105-162125"
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > LKP mailing list
> > LKP@lists.01.org
> > https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/lkp
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-01-06 16:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-01-06 2:47 [rcu] b8084f70e0: No primary result change, 1414.7% unixbench.time.involuntary_context_switches kernel test robot
2016-01-06 3:30 ` Paul E. McKenney
2016-01-06 3:30 ` [lkp] " Paul E. McKenney
2016-01-06 4:25 ` Huang, Ying
2016-01-06 4:25 ` [LKP] [lkp] " Huang, Ying
2016-01-06 16:00 ` Paul E. McKenney [this message]
2016-01-06 16:00 ` Paul E. McKenney
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160106160035.GJ3818@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=lkp@lists.01.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.