All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Petko Manolov <petkan@mip-labs.com>
To: Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>,
	James Morris <jmorris@namei.org>,
	linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org, keyrings@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mdb@juniper.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH] X.509: Partially revert patch to add validation against IMA MOK keyring
Date: Wed, 13 Jan 2016 20:01:29 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160113180129.GA7826@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1452707496.2683.14.camel@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

On 16-01-13 12:51:36, Mimi Zohar wrote:
> On Wed, 2016-01-13 at 18:31 +0200, Petko Manolov wrote:
> > 
> > I am not opposed to everything what you suggest.  Since we did that work in 
> > parallel (your stuff and the IMA keyring additions) with no communication 
> > between us, we ended up with broken IMA model.  I see three possibilities:
> > 
> >   - dump the IMA changes for this release (not happy about it);
> > 
> >   - try to quickly adapt the IMA system to your changes (not sure if it can be 
> >     done easily and/or quickly) and do it properly for 4.6;
> > 
> >   - elevate .ima_mok/blacklist to system wide RW keyrings (we may miss the merge 
> >     window);
> 
> I beg to differ.  The IMA model is not broken with the current patches being 
> upstreamed.  The basic concepts developed will continue to be used, perhaps 
> not directly by IMA.
> 
> David's proposal is a major redesign of keyrings and the system keyring in 
> particular.  It looks promising, but will need to be reviewed.

Due to time limitations i was not able to study David's changes in detail.  I 
only commented on what (i thought) i understood. :)

I assume a wider discussion will clean out the details.


		Petko

  reply	other threads:[~2016-01-13 18:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-01-06 13:45 [PATCH] X.509: Partially revert patch to add validation against IMA MOK keyring David Howells
2016-01-07  0:04 ` James Morris
2016-01-07  0:34 ` David Howells
2016-01-07  2:13   ` Mimi Zohar
2016-01-07  3:28     ` Mimi Zohar
2016-01-07 15:31   ` Mimi Zohar
2016-01-10 10:36     ` James Morris
2016-01-10 13:26       ` Mimi Zohar
2016-01-10 17:46         ` David Howells
2016-01-10 20:33           ` David Howells
2016-01-10 23:55             ` Mimi Zohar
2016-01-12  0:44               ` David Howells
2016-01-12  1:28                 ` Mark D. Baushke
2016-01-12  2:03                   ` David Howells
2016-01-12  2:25                     ` Mark D. Baushke
2016-01-12  3:35                     ` Mimi Zohar
2016-01-12 10:08                       ` David Howells
2016-01-12 13:21                         ` Mimi Zohar
2016-01-12 13:55                           ` David Howells
2016-01-12 15:17                             ` Mimi Zohar
2016-01-12 15:56                               ` David Howells
2016-01-12 16:02                                 ` Mimi Zohar
2016-01-12 14:11                         ` Petko Manolov
2016-01-10 20:33           ` Petko Manolov
2016-01-12  1:38             ` David Howells
2016-01-12 16:14               ` Petko Manolov
2016-01-12 17:08                 ` David Howells
2016-01-13 16:31                   ` Petko Manolov
2016-01-13 17:51                     ` Mimi Zohar
2016-01-13 18:01                       ` Petko Manolov [this message]
2016-01-13 18:19                       ` David Howells
2016-01-13 18:35                         ` Petko Manolov
2016-01-13 18:56                           ` Mimi Zohar
2016-01-13 19:19                             ` Petko Manolov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20160113180129.GA7826@localhost \
    --to=petkan@mip-labs.com \
    --cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
    --cc=jmorris@namei.org \
    --cc=keyrings@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mdb@juniper.net \
    --cc=zohar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.