From: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
To: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>, X86 ML <x86@kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Sai Praneeth Prakhya <sai.praneeth.prakhya@intel.com>,
yu-cheng yu <yu-cheng.yu@intel.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] x86/fpu: Speed up lazy FPU restores slightly
Date: Sun, 24 Jan 2016 00:35:15 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160123233515.GF16329@pd.tnic> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CALCETrV-SXxOdVmyzbknCZhT7Z6DDT+uPot_nbsV6OeCmLn6UA@mail.gmail.com>
On Sat, Jan 23, 2016 at 02:09:59PM -0800, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> Maybe this will be just cpu_has some day if my theory about the new
> improved static_cpu_has being shorter than boot_cpu_has pans out :)
Yeah, I have the static_cpu_has() simplification patchset v2 ready, will
send out tomorrow.
And yeah, as a next step, we probably should think about hiding
boot_cpu_has() and using solely static_cpu_has() everywhere instead.
The cpu_has() thing takes struct cpuinfo_x86 * and I'll bet a bunch of
money that a lot of the callsites could do static_cpu_has(), i.e., look
at boot CPU bits instead. That's for later, though.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
ECO tip #101: Trim your mails when you reply.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-01-23 23:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-01-23 0:56 [PATCH 0/5] x86/fpu: eagerfpu fixes, speedups, and default enablement Andy Lutomirski
2016-01-23 0:56 ` [PATCH 1/5] x86/fpu: Fix math emulation in eager fpu mode Andy Lutomirski
2016-01-23 10:02 ` Borislav Petkov
2016-01-23 17:40 ` Andy Lutomirski
2016-01-23 17:51 ` Borislav Petkov
2016-01-23 0:56 ` [PATCH 2/5] x86/fpu: Fix FNSAVE usage in eagerfpu mode Andy Lutomirski
2016-01-23 0:56 ` [PATCH 3/5] x86/fpu: Fold fpu_copy into fpu__copy Andy Lutomirski
2016-01-23 0:56 ` [PATCH 4/5] x86/fpu: Speed up lazy FPU restores slightly Andy Lutomirski
2016-01-23 10:14 ` Borislav Petkov
2016-01-23 22:09 ` Andy Lutomirski
2016-01-23 23:35 ` Borislav Petkov [this message]
2016-01-23 0:56 ` [PATCH 5/5] x86/fpu: Default eagerfpu=on on all CPUs Andy Lutomirski
2016-01-23 10:19 ` Borislav Petkov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160123233515.GF16329@pd.tnic \
--to=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=fenghua.yu@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luto@amacapital.net \
--cc=luto@kernel.org \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=riel@redhat.com \
--cc=sai.praneeth.prakhya@intel.com \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
--cc=yu-cheng.yu@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.