All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>,
	Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov@virtuozzo.com>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, cgroups@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm/memcontrol: avoid a spurious gcc warning
Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2016 13:55:38 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160125185538.GF29291@cmpxchg.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1453736756-1959377-3-git-send-email-arnd@arndb.de>

Hi Arnd,

On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 04:45:50PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> When CONFIG_DEBUG_VM is set, the various VM_BUG_ON() confuse gcc to
> the point where it cannot remember that 'memcg' is known to be initialized:
> 
> mm/memcontrol.c: In function 'mem_cgroup_can_attach':
> mm/memcontrol.c:4791:9: warning: 'memcg' may be used uninitialized in this function [-Wmaybe-uninitialized]
> 
> On ARM gcc-5.1, the above happens when any two or more of the VM_BUG_ON()
> are active, but not when I remove most or all of them. This is clearly
> random behavior and the only way I've found to shut up the warning is
> to add an explicit initialization.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>

Thanks Arnd.

This has been fixed upstream already:

commit eed67d75b66748a498a0592d9704081a98509444
Author: Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com>
Date:   Wed Dec 23 14:53:27 2015 -0700

    cgroup: Fix uninitialized variable warning
    
    Commit 1f7dd3e5a6e4 ("cgroup: fix handling of multi-destination migration
    from subtree_control enabling") introduced the following compiler warning:
    
    mm/memcontrol.c: In function ‘mem_cgroup_can_attach’:
    mm/memcontrol.c:4790:9: warning: ‘memcg’ may be used uninitialized in this function [-Wmaybe-uninitialized]
       mc.to = memcg;
             ^
    
    Fix this by initializing 'memcg' to NULL.
    
    This was found using gcc (GCC) 4.9.2 20150212 (Red Hat 4.9.2-6).
    
    Signed-off-by: Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com>
    Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: hannes@cmpxchg.org (Johannes Weiner)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] mm/memcontrol: avoid a spurious gcc warning
Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2016 13:55:38 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160125185538.GF29291@cmpxchg.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1453736756-1959377-3-git-send-email-arnd@arndb.de>

Hi Arnd,

On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 04:45:50PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> When CONFIG_DEBUG_VM is set, the various VM_BUG_ON() confuse gcc to
> the point where it cannot remember that 'memcg' is known to be initialized:
> 
> mm/memcontrol.c: In function 'mem_cgroup_can_attach':
> mm/memcontrol.c:4791:9: warning: 'memcg' may be used uninitialized in this function [-Wmaybe-uninitialized]
> 
> On ARM gcc-5.1, the above happens when any two or more of the VM_BUG_ON()
> are active, but not when I remove most or all of them. This is clearly
> random behavior and the only way I've found to shut up the warning is
> to add an explicit initialization.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>

Thanks Arnd.

This has been fixed upstream already:

commit eed67d75b66748a498a0592d9704081a98509444
Author: Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com>
Date:   Wed Dec 23 14:53:27 2015 -0700

    cgroup: Fix uninitialized variable warning
    
    Commit 1f7dd3e5a6e4 ("cgroup: fix handling of multi-destination migration
    from subtree_control enabling") introduced the following compiler warning:
    
    mm/memcontrol.c: In function ?mem_cgroup_can_attach?:
    mm/memcontrol.c:4790:9: warning: ?memcg? may be used uninitialized in this function [-Wmaybe-uninitialized]
       mc.to = memcg;
             ^
    
    Fix this by initializing 'memcg' to NULL.
    
    This was found using gcc (GCC) 4.9.2 20150212 (Red Hat 4.9.2-6).
    
    Signed-off-by: Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com>
    Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>,
	Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov@virtuozzo.com>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, cgroups@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm/memcontrol: avoid a spurious gcc warning
Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2016 13:55:38 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160125185538.GF29291@cmpxchg.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1453736756-1959377-3-git-send-email-arnd@arndb.de>

Hi Arnd,

On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 04:45:50PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> When CONFIG_DEBUG_VM is set, the various VM_BUG_ON() confuse gcc to
> the point where it cannot remember that 'memcg' is known to be initialized:
> 
> mm/memcontrol.c: In function 'mem_cgroup_can_attach':
> mm/memcontrol.c:4791:9: warning: 'memcg' may be used uninitialized in this function [-Wmaybe-uninitialized]
> 
> On ARM gcc-5.1, the above happens when any two or more of the VM_BUG_ON()
> are active, but not when I remove most or all of them. This is clearly
> random behavior and the only way I've found to shut up the warning is
> to add an explicit initialization.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>

Thanks Arnd.

This has been fixed upstream already:

commit eed67d75b66748a498a0592d9704081a98509444
Author: Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com>
Date:   Wed Dec 23 14:53:27 2015 -0700

    cgroup: Fix uninitialized variable warning
    
    Commit 1f7dd3e5a6e4 ("cgroup: fix handling of multi-destination migration
    from subtree_control enabling") introduced the following compiler warning:
    
    mm/memcontrol.c: In function a??mem_cgroup_can_attacha??:
    mm/memcontrol.c:4790:9: warning: a??memcga?? may be used uninitialized in this function [-Wmaybe-uninitialized]
       mc.to = memcg;
             ^
    
    Fix this by initializing 'memcg' to NULL.
    
    This was found using gcc (GCC) 4.9.2 20150212 (Red Hat 4.9.2-6).
    
    Signed-off-by: Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com>
    Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>,
	Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov@virtuozzo.com>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, cgroups@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm/memcontrol: avoid a spurious gcc warning
Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2016 13:55:38 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160125185538.GF29291@cmpxchg.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1453736756-1959377-3-git-send-email-arnd@arndb.de>

Hi Arnd,

On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 04:45:50PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> When CONFIG_DEBUG_VM is set, the various VM_BUG_ON() confuse gcc to
> the point where it cannot remember that 'memcg' is known to be initialized:
> 
> mm/memcontrol.c: In function 'mem_cgroup_can_attach':
> mm/memcontrol.c:4791:9: warning: 'memcg' may be used uninitialized in this function [-Wmaybe-uninitialized]
> 
> On ARM gcc-5.1, the above happens when any two or more of the VM_BUG_ON()
> are active, but not when I remove most or all of them. This is clearly
> random behavior and the only way I've found to shut up the warning is
> to add an explicit initialization.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>

Thanks Arnd.

This has been fixed upstream already:

commit eed67d75b66748a498a0592d9704081a98509444
Author: Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com>
Date:   Wed Dec 23 14:53:27 2015 -0700

    cgroup: Fix uninitialized variable warning
    
    Commit 1f7dd3e5a6e4 ("cgroup: fix handling of multi-destination migration
    from subtree_control enabling") introduced the following compiler warning:
    
    mm/memcontrol.c: In function ‘mem_cgroup_can_attach’:
    mm/memcontrol.c:4790:9: warning: ‘memcg’ may be used uninitialized in this function [-Wmaybe-uninitialized]
       mc.to = memcg;
             ^
    
    Fix this by initializing 'memcg' to NULL.
    
    This was found using gcc (GCC) 4.9.2 20150212 (Red Hat 4.9.2-6).
    
    Signed-off-by: Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com>
    Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>

  reply	other threads:[~2016-01-25 18:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-01-25 15:45 [PATCH] mm/memcontrol: avoid a spurious gcc warning Arnd Bergmann
2016-01-25 15:45 ` Arnd Bergmann
2016-01-25 15:45 ` Arnd Bergmann
2016-01-25 18:55 ` Johannes Weiner [this message]
2016-01-25 18:55   ` Johannes Weiner
2016-01-25 18:55   ` Johannes Weiner
2016-01-25 18:55   ` Johannes Weiner

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20160125185538.GF29291@cmpxchg.org \
    --to=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=vdavydov@virtuozzo.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.