From: hch@infradead.org (Christoph Hellwig)
Subject: [PATCHv2-4.5 04/10] NVMe: Fix namespace removal deadlock
Date: Sat, 13 Feb 2016 01:44:01 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160213094401.GA15318@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1455221147-24228-5-git-send-email-keith.busch@intel.com>
So, this one is the thing I don't like. The real issue here is the
broad scope of namespaces_mutex. I think we should have a small
scope lock protecting just the list manipulations, which is not
held over I/O, and the issue would sort itself out.
Note that we already have a high level serialization for scanning
by always executing it in the scan_work work_item, so there is no
need for the high level serialization anyway.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-02-13 9:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-02-11 20:05 [PATCHv2-4.5 00/10] NVMe fixes Keith Busch
2016-02-11 20:05 ` [PATCHv2-4.5 01/10] blk-mq: End unstarted requests on dying queue Keith Busch
2016-02-11 20:05 ` [PATCHv2-4.5 02/10] NVMe: Fix io incapable return values Keith Busch
2016-02-11 20:05 ` [PATCHv2-4.5 03/10] NVMe: Allow request merges Keith Busch
2016-02-11 20:05 ` [PATCHv2-4.5 04/10] NVMe: Fix namespace removal deadlock Keith Busch
2016-02-13 9:44 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2016-02-11 20:05 ` [PATCHv2-4.5 05/10] NVMe: Requeue requests on suspended queues Keith Busch
2016-02-11 20:05 ` [PATCHv2-4.5 06/10] NVMe: Poll device while still active during remove Keith Busch
2016-02-11 20:05 ` [PATCHv2-4.5 07/10] NVMe: Simplify device reset failure Keith Busch
2016-02-13 9:21 ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-02-11 20:05 ` [PATCHv2-4.5 08/10] NVMe: Move error handling to failed reset handler Keith Busch
2016-02-13 9:46 ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-02-16 21:57 ` Keith Busch
2016-02-17 8:06 ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-02-11 20:05 ` [PATCHv2-4.5 09/10] NVMe: Mark queues as dead on degraded controller Keith Busch
2016-02-11 20:05 ` [PATCHv2-4.5 10/10] NVMe: Rate limit nvme IO warnings Keith Busch
2016-02-12 8:16 ` Johannes Thumshirn
2016-02-11 22:28 ` [PATCHv2-4.5 00/10] NVMe fixes Keith Busch
2016-02-11 22:38 ` Jens Axboe
2016-02-12 8:35 ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-02-12 15:09 ` Jens Axboe
2016-02-12 15:24 ` Keith Busch
2016-02-13 9:49 ` Christoph Hellwig
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160213094401.GA15318@infradead.org \
--to=hch@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.