Re: next-20160222 build: 5 failures 9 warnings (next-20160222)

From: Brian Starkey <brian.starkey@arm.com>
To: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Cc: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>,
	Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@linaro.org>,
	linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org, kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu,
	linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	kernel-build-reports@lists.linaro.org
Subject: Re: next-20160222 build: 5 failures 9 warnings (next-20160222)
Date: Mon, 22 Feb 2016 11:52:43 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160222115243.GA5779@e106950-lin.cambridge.arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <56CAE5E6.7030707@arm.com>

Hi Mark,

On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 10:41:42AM +0000, Marc Zyngier wrote:
>I'm about to push the following patch on top of the KVM tree:
>
>diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h
>index 43688d9..31fe7d6 100644
>--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h
>+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h
>@@ -333,11 +333,6 @@ static inline void __cpu_init_hyp_mode(phys_addr_t boot_pgd_ptr,
> 		     hyp_stack_ptr, vector_ptr);
> }
>
>-static inline void __cpu_init_stage2(void)
>-{
>-	kvm_call_hyp(__init_stage2_translation);
>-}
>-
> static inline void kvm_arch_hardware_disable(void) {}
> static inline void kvm_arch_hardware_unsetup(void) {}
> static inline void kvm_arch_sync_events(struct kvm *kvm) {}
>@@ -349,4 +344,11 @@ void kvm_arm_setup_debug(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
> void kvm_arm_clear_debug(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
> void kvm_arm_reset_debug_ptr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
>
>+/* #define kvm_call_hyp(f, ...) __kvm_call_hyp(kvm_ksym_ref(f), ##__VA_ARGS__) */
>+
>+static inline void __cpu_init_stage2(void)
>+{
>+	kvm_call_hyp(__init_stage2_translation);
>+}
>+
> #endif /* __ARM64_KVM_HOST_H__ */
>
>This will create a new conflict, but will make the resolution 100% clear.

I applied this, but arm64 defconfig wouldn't build until I uncommented
the '#define kvm_call_hyp(...' line.

Is that right?

Thanks,
Brian

>
>Thanks,
>
>	M.
>-- 
>Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...
>
>_______________________________________________
>linux-arm-kernel mailing list
>linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
>http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
>