From: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>
To: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>,
linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org>,
Mark Salter <msalter@redhat.com>, Al Stone <ahs3@redhat.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Loc Ho <lho@apm.com>,
Itaru Kitayama <itaru.kitayama@riken.jp>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] ARM64: kernel: implement ACPI parking protocol
Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2016 15:03:14 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160224150314.GD25385@red-moon> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160224141832.GA26630@red-moon>
On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 02:18:32PM +0000, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:
[...]
> static int acpi_parking_protocol_cpu_boot(unsigned int cpu)
> {
> struct cpu_mailbox_entry *cpu_entry = &cpu_mailbox_entries[cpu];
> @@ -107,7 +108,11 @@ static int acpi_parking_protocol_cpu_boot(unsigned int cpu)
>
> arch_send_wakeup_ipi_mask(cpumask_of(cpu));
>
> - iounmap(mailbox);
> + /*
> + * stash the mailbox address mapping to use it for checks
> + * in post boot method
> + */
> + cpu_entry->mailbox = mailbox;
The mailbox VA entry should be stashed before setting up the mailbox
and sending the IPI, anyway, if Loc and Itaru can test it I will wrap
this change into the final version with appropriate log.
Lorenzo
>
> return 0;
> }
> @@ -116,32 +121,15 @@ static void acpi_parking_protocol_cpu_postboot(void)
> {
> int cpu = smp_processor_id();
> struct cpu_mailbox_entry *cpu_entry = &cpu_mailbox_entries[cpu];
> - struct parking_protocol_mailbox __iomem *mailbox;
> + struct parking_protocol_mailbox __iomem *mailbox = cpu_entry->mailbox;
> __le64 entry_point;
>
> - /*
> - * Map mailbox memory with attribute device nGnRE (ie ioremap -
> - * this deviates from the parking protocol specifications since
> - * the mailboxes are required to be mapped nGnRnE; the attribute
> - * discrepancy is harmless insofar as the protocol specification
> - * is concerned).
> - * If the mailbox is mistakenly allocated in the linear mapping
> - * by FW ioremap will fail since the mapping will be prevented
> - * by the kernel (it clashes with the linear mapping attributes
> - * specifications).
> - */
> - mailbox = ioremap(cpu_entry->mailbox_addr, sizeof(*mailbox));
> - if (!mailbox)
> - return;
> -
> entry_point = readl_relaxed(&mailbox->entry_point);
> /*
> * Check if firmware has cleared the entry_point as expected
> * by the protocol specification.
> */
> WARN_ON(entry_point);
> -
> - iounmap(mailbox);
> }
>
> const struct cpu_operations acpi_parking_protocol_ops = {
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com (Lorenzo Pieralisi)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v3] ARM64: kernel: implement ACPI parking protocol
Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2016 15:03:14 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160224150314.GD25385@red-moon> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160224141832.GA26630@red-moon>
On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 02:18:32PM +0000, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:
[...]
> static int acpi_parking_protocol_cpu_boot(unsigned int cpu)
> {
> struct cpu_mailbox_entry *cpu_entry = &cpu_mailbox_entries[cpu];
> @@ -107,7 +108,11 @@ static int acpi_parking_protocol_cpu_boot(unsigned int cpu)
>
> arch_send_wakeup_ipi_mask(cpumask_of(cpu));
>
> - iounmap(mailbox);
> + /*
> + * stash the mailbox address mapping to use it for checks
> + * in post boot method
> + */
> + cpu_entry->mailbox = mailbox;
The mailbox VA entry should be stashed before setting up the mailbox
and sending the IPI, anyway, if Loc and Itaru can test it I will wrap
this change into the final version with appropriate log.
Lorenzo
>
> return 0;
> }
> @@ -116,32 +121,15 @@ static void acpi_parking_protocol_cpu_postboot(void)
> {
> int cpu = smp_processor_id();
> struct cpu_mailbox_entry *cpu_entry = &cpu_mailbox_entries[cpu];
> - struct parking_protocol_mailbox __iomem *mailbox;
> + struct parking_protocol_mailbox __iomem *mailbox = cpu_entry->mailbox;
> __le64 entry_point;
>
> - /*
> - * Map mailbox memory with attribute device nGnRE (ie ioremap -
> - * this deviates from the parking protocol specifications since
> - * the mailboxes are required to be mapped nGnRnE; the attribute
> - * discrepancy is harmless insofar as the protocol specification
> - * is concerned).
> - * If the mailbox is mistakenly allocated in the linear mapping
> - * by FW ioremap will fail since the mapping will be prevented
> - * by the kernel (it clashes with the linear mapping attributes
> - * specifications).
> - */
> - mailbox = ioremap(cpu_entry->mailbox_addr, sizeof(*mailbox));
> - if (!mailbox)
> - return;
> -
> entry_point = readl_relaxed(&mailbox->entry_point);
> /*
> * Check if firmware has cleared the entry_point as expected
> * by the protocol specification.
> */
> WARN_ON(entry_point);
> -
> - iounmap(mailbox);
> }
>
> const struct cpu_operations acpi_parking_protocol_ops = {
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-02-24 15:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-01-26 11:10 [PATCH v3] ARM64: kernel: implement ACPI parking protocol Lorenzo Pieralisi
2016-01-26 11:10 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2016-01-26 17:47 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2016-01-26 17:47 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2016-01-27 10:23 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2016-01-27 10:23 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2016-01-27 11:46 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2016-01-27 11:46 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2016-01-26 23:13 ` Loc Ho
2016-01-26 23:13 ` Loc Ho
2016-01-27 11:51 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2016-01-27 11:51 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2016-01-27 17:41 ` Loc Ho
2016-01-27 17:41 ` Loc Ho
2016-02-02 18:26 ` Catalin Marinas
2016-02-02 18:26 ` Catalin Marinas
2016-02-03 11:21 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2016-02-03 11:21 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2016-02-03 16:18 ` Catalin Marinas
2016-02-03 16:18 ` Catalin Marinas
2016-02-24 14:18 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2016-02-24 14:18 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2016-02-24 15:03 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi [this message]
2016-02-24 15:03 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2016-02-24 23:28 ` Itaru Kitayama
2016-02-24 23:28 ` Itaru Kitayama
2016-02-25 9:24 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2016-02-25 9:24 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2016-02-25 20:58 ` Loc Ho
2016-02-25 20:58 ` Loc Ho
2016-02-26 0:23 ` Itaru Kitayama
2016-02-26 0:23 ` Itaru Kitayama
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160224150314.GD25385@red-moon \
--to=lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com \
--cc=ahs3@redhat.com \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=hanjun.guo@linaro.org \
--cc=itaru.kitayama@riken.jp \
--cc=lho@apm.com \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=msalter@redhat.com \
--cc=sudeep.holla@arm.com \
--cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.