From: luca abeni <luca.abeni@unitn.it>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@arm.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Question about prio_changed_dl()
Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2016 15:25:58 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160225152558.2fbac9e5@utopia> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160225140149.GK6357@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Hi Peter,
On Thu, 25 Feb 2016 15:01:49 +0100
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> wrote:
[...]
> > so, prio_changed_dl() invokes switched_to_dl() if
> > task_on_rq_queued() is false, but in this case switched_to_dl()
> > does nothing... Am I missing something, or the
> > } else
> > switched_to_dl(rq, p);
> > is useless?
>
> Agreed, see below.
>
> > (BTW, it seems to me that switched_to_dl() is never invoked, for
> > some reason...)
>
> Hmm, it should be invoked if you do sched_setattr() to get
> SCHED_DEADLINE.
Sorry, that was me being confused...
It is prio_changed_dl() that is not invoked when the deadline
parameters are changed (I am testing a change to fix this - it actually
is included in the "Move the remaining __dl_{sub,add}_ac() calls from
core.c to deadline.c" patch I posted on Monday; I am going to extract
it in a separate patch).
switched_to_dl() is correctly invoked.
>
> ---
> Subject: sched/deadline: Remove superfluous call to switched_to_dl()
This is what I was thinking about, yes :)
Thanks,
Luca
>
> if (A || B) {
>
> } else if (A && !B) {
>
> }
>
> If A we'll take the first branch, if !A we will not satisfy the
> second. Therefore the second branch will never be taken.
>
> Cc: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@arm.com>
> Reported-by: luca abeni <luca.abeni@unitn.it>
> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
> ---
> kernel/sched/deadline.c | 3 +--
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/deadline.c b/kernel/sched/deadline.c
> index 57b939c81bce..c161c53d9424 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/deadline.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/deadline.c
> @@ -1768,8 +1768,7 @@ static void prio_changed_dl(struct rq *rq,
> struct task_struct *p, */
> resched_curr(rq);
> #endif /* CONFIG_SMP */
> - } else
> - switched_to_dl(rq, p);
> + }
> }
>
> const struct sched_class dl_sched_class = {
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-02-25 14:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-02-19 12:43 Question about prio_changed_dl() luca abeni
2016-02-25 14:01 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-02-25 14:16 ` Juri Lelli
2016-02-25 14:25 ` luca abeni [this message]
2016-02-25 14:52 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-02-27 11:37 ` luca abeni
2016-03-02 19:02 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-03-02 20:16 ` luca abeni
2016-03-02 20:58 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-03-04 8:50 ` luca abeni
2016-02-29 11:19 ` [tip:sched/core] sched/deadline: Remove superfluous call to switched_to_dl() tip-bot for Peter Zijlstra
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160225152558.2fbac9e5@utopia \
--to=luca.abeni@unitn.it \
--cc=juri.lelli@arm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.