All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: luca abeni <luca.abeni@unitn.it>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@arm.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Question about prio_changed_dl()
Date: Wed, 2 Mar 2016 21:16:57 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160302211657.4e4d622a@utopia> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160302190258.GK6357@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>

On Wed, 2 Mar 2016 20:02:58 +0100
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> wrote:

> On Sat, Feb 27, 2016 at 12:37:57PM +0100, luca abeni wrote:
> > Subject: sched/core: fix __sched_setscheduler() to properly invoke prio_changed_dl()
> > 
> > Currently, prio_changed_dl() is not called when __sched_setscheduler()
> > changes the parameters of a SCHED_DEADLINE task. This happens because
> > when changing parameters deadline tasks do not change their priority,
> > so new_effective_prio == oldprio.
> > The issue is fixed by explicitly checking if the task is a deadline task.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Luca Abeni <luca.abeni@unitn.it>
> > ---
> >  kernel/sched/core.c | 2 ++
> >  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
> > 
> > diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c
> > index 9503d59..5646bde 100644
> > --- a/kernel/sched/core.c
> > +++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
> > @@ -4079,6 +4079,8 @@ change:
> >  		new_effective_prio = rt_mutex_get_effective_prio(p, newprio);
> >  		if (new_effective_prio == oldprio) {
> >  			__setscheduler_params(p, attr);
> > +			if (p->sched_class == &dl_sched_class)
> > +				p->sched_class->prio_changed(rq, p, oldprio);
> >  			task_rq_unlock(rq, p, &flags);
> >  			return 0;
> >  		}
> 
> That code no longer exists like that.
Uh... I must have done something wrong, then (I was convinced I pulled
from master and rebased my patch before testing and sending it, but
probably something went wrong).
Sorry about that.


> Can you see if the below patch (which caused that) also fixes your
> problem?
Ok; in the next days I'll make sure to have this patch applied and
I'll test it.


			Thanks,
				Luca
> 
> ---
> commit ff77e468535987b3d21b7bd4da15608ea3ce7d0b
> Author: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
> Date:   Mon Jan 18 15:27:07 2016 +0100
> 
>     sched/rt: Fix PI handling vs. sched_setscheduler()
>     
>     Andrea Parri reported:
>     
>     > I found that the following scenario (with CONFIG_RT_GROUP_SCHED=y) is not
>     > handled correctly:
>     >
>     >     T1 (prio = 20)
>     >        lock(rtmutex);
>     >
>     >     T2 (prio = 20)
>     >        blocks on rtmutex  (rt_nr_boosted = 0 on T1's rq)
>     >
>     >     T1 (prio = 20)
>     >        sys_set_scheduler(prio = 0)
>     >           [new_effective_prio == oldprio]
>     >           T1 prio = 20    (rt_nr_boosted = 0 on T1's rq)
>     >
>     > The last step is incorrect as T1 is now boosted (c.f., rt_se_boosted());
>     > in particular, if we continue with
>     >
>     >    T1 (prio = 20)
>     >       unlock(rtmutex)
>     >          wakeup(T2)
>     >          adjust_prio(T1)
>     >             [prio != rt_mutex_getprio(T1)]
>     >	    dequeue(T1)
>     >	       rt_nr_boosted = (unsigned long)(-1)
>     >	       ...
>     >             T1 prio = 0
>     >
>     > then we end up leaving rt_nr_boosted in an "inconsistent" state.
>     >
>     > The simple program attached could reproduce the previous scenario; note
>     > that, as a consequence of the presence of this state, the "assertion"
>     >
>     >     WARN_ON(!rt_nr_running && rt_nr_boosted)
>     >
>     > from dec_rt_group() may trigger.
>     
>     So normally we dequeue/enqueue tasks in sched_setscheduler(), which
>     would ensure the accounting stays correct. However in the early PI path
>     we fail to do so.
>     
>     So this was introduced at around v3.14, by:
>     
>       c365c292d059 ("sched: Consider pi boosting in setscheduler()")
>     
>     which fixed another problem exactly because that dequeue/enqueue, joy.
>     
>     Fix this by teaching rt about DEQUEUE_SAVE/ENQUEUE_RESTORE and have it
>     preserve runqueue location with that option. This requires decoupling
>     the on_rt_rq() state from being on the list.
>     
>     In order to allow for explicit movement during the SAVE/RESTORE,
>     introduce {DE,EN}QUEUE_MOVE. We still must use SAVE/RESTORE in these
>     cases to preserve other invariants.
>     
>     Respecting the SAVE/RESTORE flags also has the (nice) side-effect that
>     things like sys_nice()/sys_sched_setaffinity() also do not reorder
>     FIFO tasks (whereas they used to before this patch).
>     
>     Reported-by: Andrea Parri <parri.andrea@gmail.com>
>     Tested-by: Andrea Parri <parri.andrea@gmail.com>
>     Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
>     Cc: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@arm.com>
>     Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
>     Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
>     Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
>     Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
>     Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
>     Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
> 
> diff --git a/include/linux/sched.h b/include/linux/sched.h
> index a292c4b7e94c..87e5f9886ac8 100644
> --- a/include/linux/sched.h
> +++ b/include/linux/sched.h
> @@ -1293,6 +1293,8 @@ struct sched_rt_entity {
>  	unsigned long timeout;
>  	unsigned long watchdog_stamp;
>  	unsigned int time_slice;
> +	unsigned short on_rq;
> +	unsigned short on_list;
>  
>  	struct sched_rt_entity *back;
>  #ifdef CONFIG_RT_GROUP_SCHED
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c
> index 291552b4d8ee..bb565b4663c8 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/core.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
> @@ -2221,6 +2221,10 @@ static void __sched_fork(unsigned long clone_flags, struct task_struct *p)
>  	__dl_clear_params(p);
>  
>  	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&p->rt.run_list);
> +	p->rt.timeout		= 0;
> +	p->rt.time_slice	= sched_rr_timeslice;
> +	p->rt.on_rq		= 0;
> +	p->rt.on_list		= 0;
>  
>  #ifdef CONFIG_PREEMPT_NOTIFIERS
>  	INIT_HLIST_HEAD(&p->preempt_notifiers);
> @@ -3531,7 +3535,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(default_wake_function);
>   */
>  void rt_mutex_setprio(struct task_struct *p, int prio)
>  {
> -	int oldprio, queued, running, enqueue_flag = ENQUEUE_RESTORE;
> +	int oldprio, queued, running, queue_flag = DEQUEUE_SAVE | DEQUEUE_MOVE;
>  	struct rq *rq;
>  	const struct sched_class *prev_class;
>  
> @@ -3559,11 +3563,15 @@ void rt_mutex_setprio(struct task_struct *p, int prio)
>  
>  	trace_sched_pi_setprio(p, prio);
>  	oldprio = p->prio;
> +
> +	if (oldprio == prio)
> +		queue_flag &= ~DEQUEUE_MOVE;
> +
>  	prev_class = p->sched_class;
>  	queued = task_on_rq_queued(p);
>  	running = task_current(rq, p);
>  	if (queued)
> -		dequeue_task(rq, p, DEQUEUE_SAVE);
> +		dequeue_task(rq, p, queue_flag);
>  	if (running)
>  		put_prev_task(rq, p);
>  
> @@ -3581,7 +3589,7 @@ void rt_mutex_setprio(struct task_struct *p, int prio)
>  		if (!dl_prio(p->normal_prio) ||
>  		    (pi_task && dl_entity_preempt(&pi_task->dl, &p->dl))) {
>  			p->dl.dl_boosted = 1;
> -			enqueue_flag |= ENQUEUE_REPLENISH;
> +			queue_flag |= ENQUEUE_REPLENISH;
>  		} else
>  			p->dl.dl_boosted = 0;
>  		p->sched_class = &dl_sched_class;
> @@ -3589,7 +3597,7 @@ void rt_mutex_setprio(struct task_struct *p, int prio)
>  		if (dl_prio(oldprio))
>  			p->dl.dl_boosted = 0;
>  		if (oldprio < prio)
> -			enqueue_flag |= ENQUEUE_HEAD;
> +			queue_flag |= ENQUEUE_HEAD;
>  		p->sched_class = &rt_sched_class;
>  	} else {
>  		if (dl_prio(oldprio))
> @@ -3604,7 +3612,7 @@ void rt_mutex_setprio(struct task_struct *p, int prio)
>  	if (running)
>  		p->sched_class->set_curr_task(rq);
>  	if (queued)
> -		enqueue_task(rq, p, enqueue_flag);
> +		enqueue_task(rq, p, queue_flag);
>  
>  	check_class_changed(rq, p, prev_class, oldprio);
>  out_unlock:
> @@ -3960,6 +3968,7 @@ static int __sched_setscheduler(struct task_struct *p,
>  	const struct sched_class *prev_class;
>  	struct rq *rq;
>  	int reset_on_fork;
> +	int queue_flags = DEQUEUE_SAVE | DEQUEUE_MOVE;
>  
>  	/* may grab non-irq protected spin_locks */
>  	BUG_ON(in_interrupt());
> @@ -4142,17 +4151,14 @@ static int __sched_setscheduler(struct task_struct *p,
>  		 * itself.
>  		 */
>  		new_effective_prio = rt_mutex_get_effective_prio(p, newprio);
> -		if (new_effective_prio == oldprio) {
> -			__setscheduler_params(p, attr);
> -			task_rq_unlock(rq, p, &flags);
> -			return 0;
> -		}
> +		if (new_effective_prio == oldprio)
> +			queue_flags &= ~DEQUEUE_MOVE;
>  	}
>  
>  	queued = task_on_rq_queued(p);
>  	running = task_current(rq, p);
>  	if (queued)
> -		dequeue_task(rq, p, DEQUEUE_SAVE);
> +		dequeue_task(rq, p, queue_flags);
>  	if (running)
>  		put_prev_task(rq, p);
>  
> @@ -4162,15 +4168,14 @@ static int __sched_setscheduler(struct task_struct *p,
>  	if (running)
>  		p->sched_class->set_curr_task(rq);
>  	if (queued) {
> -		int enqueue_flags = ENQUEUE_RESTORE;
>  		/*
>  		 * We enqueue to tail when the priority of a task is
>  		 * increased (user space view).
>  		 */
> -		if (oldprio <= p->prio)
> -			enqueue_flags |= ENQUEUE_HEAD;
> +		if (oldprio < p->prio)
> +			queue_flags |= ENQUEUE_HEAD;
>  
> -		enqueue_task(rq, p, enqueue_flags);
> +		enqueue_task(rq, p, queue_flags);
>  	}
>  
>  	check_class_changed(rq, p, prev_class, oldprio);
> @@ -7958,7 +7963,7 @@ void sched_move_task(struct task_struct *tsk)
>  	queued = task_on_rq_queued(tsk);
>  
>  	if (queued)
> -		dequeue_task(rq, tsk, DEQUEUE_SAVE);
> +		dequeue_task(rq, tsk, DEQUEUE_SAVE | DEQUEUE_MOVE);
>  	if (unlikely(running))
>  		put_prev_task(rq, tsk);
>  
> @@ -7982,7 +7987,7 @@ void sched_move_task(struct task_struct *tsk)
>  	if (unlikely(running))
>  		tsk->sched_class->set_curr_task(rq);
>  	if (queued)
> -		enqueue_task(rq, tsk, ENQUEUE_RESTORE);
> +		enqueue_task(rq, tsk, ENQUEUE_RESTORE | ENQUEUE_MOVE);
>  
>  	task_rq_unlock(rq, tsk, &flags);
>  }
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/rt.c b/kernel/sched/rt.c
> index 8ec86abe0ea1..406a9c20b210 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/rt.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/rt.c
> @@ -436,7 +436,7 @@ static void dequeue_top_rt_rq(struct rt_rq *rt_rq);
>  
>  static inline int on_rt_rq(struct sched_rt_entity *rt_se)
>  {
> -	return !list_empty(&rt_se->run_list);
> +	return rt_se->on_rq;
>  }
>  
>  #ifdef CONFIG_RT_GROUP_SCHED
> @@ -482,8 +482,8 @@ static inline struct rt_rq *group_rt_rq(struct sched_rt_entity *rt_se)
>  	return rt_se->my_q;
>  }
>  
> -static void enqueue_rt_entity(struct sched_rt_entity *rt_se, bool head);
> -static void dequeue_rt_entity(struct sched_rt_entity *rt_se);
> +static void enqueue_rt_entity(struct sched_rt_entity *rt_se, unsigned int flags);
> +static void dequeue_rt_entity(struct sched_rt_entity *rt_se, unsigned int flags);
>  
>  static void sched_rt_rq_enqueue(struct rt_rq *rt_rq)
>  {
> @@ -499,7 +499,7 @@ static void sched_rt_rq_enqueue(struct rt_rq *rt_rq)
>  		if (!rt_se)
>  			enqueue_top_rt_rq(rt_rq);
>  		else if (!on_rt_rq(rt_se))
> -			enqueue_rt_entity(rt_se, false);
> +			enqueue_rt_entity(rt_se, 0);
>  
>  		if (rt_rq->highest_prio.curr < curr->prio)
>  			resched_curr(rq);
> @@ -516,7 +516,7 @@ static void sched_rt_rq_dequeue(struct rt_rq *rt_rq)
>  	if (!rt_se)
>  		dequeue_top_rt_rq(rt_rq);
>  	else if (on_rt_rq(rt_se))
> -		dequeue_rt_entity(rt_se);
> +		dequeue_rt_entity(rt_se, 0);
>  }
>  
>  static inline int rt_rq_throttled(struct rt_rq *rt_rq)
> @@ -1166,7 +1166,30 @@ void dec_rt_tasks(struct sched_rt_entity *rt_se, struct rt_rq *rt_rq)
>  	dec_rt_group(rt_se, rt_rq);
>  }
>  
> -static void __enqueue_rt_entity(struct sched_rt_entity *rt_se, bool head)
> +/*
> + * Change rt_se->run_list location unless SAVE && !MOVE
> + *
> + * assumes ENQUEUE/DEQUEUE flags match
> + */
> +static inline bool move_entity(unsigned int flags)
> +{
> +	if ((flags & (DEQUEUE_SAVE | DEQUEUE_MOVE)) == DEQUEUE_SAVE)
> +		return false;
> +
> +	return true;
> +}
> +
> +static void __delist_rt_entity(struct sched_rt_entity *rt_se, struct rt_prio_array *array)
> +{
> +	list_del_init(&rt_se->run_list);
> +
> +	if (list_empty(array->queue + rt_se_prio(rt_se)))
> +		__clear_bit(rt_se_prio(rt_se), array->bitmap);
> +
> +	rt_se->on_list = 0;
> +}
> +
> +static void __enqueue_rt_entity(struct sched_rt_entity *rt_se, unsigned int flags)
>  {
>  	struct rt_rq *rt_rq = rt_rq_of_se(rt_se);
>  	struct rt_prio_array *array = &rt_rq->active;
> @@ -1179,26 +1202,37 @@ static void __enqueue_rt_entity(struct sched_rt_entity *rt_se, bool head)
>  	 * get throttled and the current group doesn't have any other
>  	 * active members.
>  	 */
> -	if (group_rq && (rt_rq_throttled(group_rq) || !group_rq->rt_nr_running))
> +	if (group_rq && (rt_rq_throttled(group_rq) || !group_rq->rt_nr_running)) {
> +		if (rt_se->on_list)
> +			__delist_rt_entity(rt_se, array);
>  		return;
> +	}
>  
> -	if (head)
> -		list_add(&rt_se->run_list, queue);
> -	else
> -		list_add_tail(&rt_se->run_list, queue);
> -	__set_bit(rt_se_prio(rt_se), array->bitmap);
> +	if (move_entity(flags)) {
> +		WARN_ON_ONCE(rt_se->on_list);
> +		if (flags & ENQUEUE_HEAD)
> +			list_add(&rt_se->run_list, queue);
> +		else
> +			list_add_tail(&rt_se->run_list, queue);
> +
> +		__set_bit(rt_se_prio(rt_se), array->bitmap);
> +		rt_se->on_list = 1;
> +	}
> +	rt_se->on_rq = 1;
>  
>  	inc_rt_tasks(rt_se, rt_rq);
>  }
>  
> -static void __dequeue_rt_entity(struct sched_rt_entity *rt_se)
> +static void __dequeue_rt_entity(struct sched_rt_entity *rt_se, unsigned int flags)
>  {
>  	struct rt_rq *rt_rq = rt_rq_of_se(rt_se);
>  	struct rt_prio_array *array = &rt_rq->active;
>  
> -	list_del_init(&rt_se->run_list);
> -	if (list_empty(array->queue + rt_se_prio(rt_se)))
> -		__clear_bit(rt_se_prio(rt_se), array->bitmap);
> +	if (move_entity(flags)) {
> +		WARN_ON_ONCE(!rt_se->on_list);
> +		__delist_rt_entity(rt_se, array);
> +	}
> +	rt_se->on_rq = 0;
>  
>  	dec_rt_tasks(rt_se, rt_rq);
>  }
> @@ -1207,7 +1241,7 @@ static void __dequeue_rt_entity(struct sched_rt_entity *rt_se)
>   * Because the prio of an upper entry depends on the lower
>   * entries, we must remove entries top - down.
>   */
> -static void dequeue_rt_stack(struct sched_rt_entity *rt_se)
> +static void dequeue_rt_stack(struct sched_rt_entity *rt_se, unsigned int flags)
>  {
>  	struct sched_rt_entity *back = NULL;
>  
> @@ -1220,31 +1254,31 @@ static void dequeue_rt_stack(struct sched_rt_entity *rt_se)
>  
>  	for (rt_se = back; rt_se; rt_se = rt_se->back) {
>  		if (on_rt_rq(rt_se))
> -			__dequeue_rt_entity(rt_se);
> +			__dequeue_rt_entity(rt_se, flags);
>  	}
>  }
>  
> -static void enqueue_rt_entity(struct sched_rt_entity *rt_se, bool head)
> +static void enqueue_rt_entity(struct sched_rt_entity *rt_se, unsigned int flags)
>  {
>  	struct rq *rq = rq_of_rt_se(rt_se);
>  
> -	dequeue_rt_stack(rt_se);
> +	dequeue_rt_stack(rt_se, flags);
>  	for_each_sched_rt_entity(rt_se)
> -		__enqueue_rt_entity(rt_se, head);
> +		__enqueue_rt_entity(rt_se, flags);
>  	enqueue_top_rt_rq(&rq->rt);
>  }
>  
> -static void dequeue_rt_entity(struct sched_rt_entity *rt_se)
> +static void dequeue_rt_entity(struct sched_rt_entity *rt_se, unsigned int flags)
>  {
>  	struct rq *rq = rq_of_rt_se(rt_se);
>  
> -	dequeue_rt_stack(rt_se);
> +	dequeue_rt_stack(rt_se, flags);
>  
>  	for_each_sched_rt_entity(rt_se) {
>  		struct rt_rq *rt_rq = group_rt_rq(rt_se);
>  
>  		if (rt_rq && rt_rq->rt_nr_running)
> -			__enqueue_rt_entity(rt_se, false);
> +			__enqueue_rt_entity(rt_se, flags);
>  	}
>  	enqueue_top_rt_rq(&rq->rt);
>  }
> @@ -1260,7 +1294,7 @@ enqueue_task_rt(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, int flags)
>  	if (flags & ENQUEUE_WAKEUP)
>  		rt_se->timeout = 0;
>  
> -	enqueue_rt_entity(rt_se, flags & ENQUEUE_HEAD);
> +	enqueue_rt_entity(rt_se, flags);
>  
>  	if (!task_current(rq, p) && p->nr_cpus_allowed > 1)
>  		enqueue_pushable_task(rq, p);
> @@ -1271,7 +1305,7 @@ static void dequeue_task_rt(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, int flags)
>  	struct sched_rt_entity *rt_se = &p->rt;
>  
>  	update_curr_rt(rq);
> -	dequeue_rt_entity(rt_se);
> +	dequeue_rt_entity(rt_se, flags);
>  
>  	dequeue_pushable_task(rq, p);
>  }
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/sched.h b/kernel/sched/sched.h
> index 3dc7b8b3f94c..d3606e40ea0d 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/sched.h
> +++ b/kernel/sched/sched.h
> @@ -1130,18 +1130,40 @@ static inline void finish_lock_switch(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *prev)
>  extern const int sched_prio_to_weight[40];
>  extern const u32 sched_prio_to_wmult[40];
>  
> +/*
> + * {de,en}queue flags:
> + *
> + * DEQUEUE_SLEEP  - task is no longer runnable
> + * ENQUEUE_WAKEUP - task just became runnable
> + *
> + * SAVE/RESTORE - an otherwise spurious dequeue/enqueue, done to ensure tasks
> + *                are in a known state which allows modification. Such pairs
> + *                should preserve as much state as possible.
> + *
> + * MOVE - paired with SAVE/RESTORE, explicitly does not preserve the location
> + *        in the runqueue.
> + *
> + * ENQUEUE_HEAD      - place at front of runqueue (tail if not specified)
> + * ENQUEUE_REPLENISH - CBS (replenish runtime and postpone deadline)
> + * ENQUEUE_WAKING    - sched_class::task_waking was called
> + *
> + */
> +
> +#define DEQUEUE_SLEEP		0x01
> +#define DEQUEUE_SAVE		0x02 /* matches ENQUEUE_RESTORE */
> +#define DEQUEUE_MOVE		0x04 /* matches ENQUEUE_MOVE */
> +
>  #define ENQUEUE_WAKEUP		0x01
> -#define ENQUEUE_HEAD		0x02
> +#define ENQUEUE_RESTORE		0x02
> +#define ENQUEUE_MOVE		0x04
> +
> +#define ENQUEUE_HEAD		0x08
> +#define ENQUEUE_REPLENISH	0x10
>  #ifdef CONFIG_SMP
> -#define ENQUEUE_WAKING		0x04	/* sched_class::task_waking was called */
> +#define ENQUEUE_WAKING		0x20
>  #else
>  #define ENQUEUE_WAKING		0x00
>  #endif
> -#define ENQUEUE_REPLENISH	0x08
> -#define ENQUEUE_RESTORE	0x10
> -
> -#define DEQUEUE_SLEEP		0x01
> -#define DEQUEUE_SAVE		0x02
>  
>  #define RETRY_TASK		((void *)-1UL)
>  

  reply	other threads:[~2016-03-02 20:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-02-19 12:43 Question about prio_changed_dl() luca abeni
2016-02-25 14:01 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-02-25 14:16   ` Juri Lelli
2016-02-25 14:25   ` luca abeni
2016-02-25 14:52     ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-02-27 11:37       ` luca abeni
2016-03-02 19:02         ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-03-02 20:16           ` luca abeni [this message]
2016-03-02 20:58             ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-03-04  8:50           ` luca abeni
2016-02-29 11:19   ` [tip:sched/core] sched/deadline: Remove superfluous call to switched_to_dl() tip-bot for Peter Zijlstra

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20160302211657.4e4d622a@utopia \
    --to=luca.abeni@unitn.it \
    --cc=juri.lelli@arm.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.