All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
To: walter harms <wharms@bfs.de>
Cc: Maruthi Srinivas Bayyavarapu <Maruthi.Bayyavarapu@amd.com>,
	Jammy Zhou <Jammy.Zhou@amd.com>,
	kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
	Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>,
	Murali Krishna Vemuri <murali-krishna.vemuri@amd.com>
Subject: Re: [patch] drm/amd: cleanup get_mfd_cell_dev()
Date: Sat, 27 Feb 2016 10:40:49 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160227104049.GN5273@mwanda> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <56D17170.80408@bfs.de>

On Sat, Feb 27, 2016 at 10:50:40AM +0100, walter harms wrote:
> 
> 
> Am 25.02.2016 08:47, schrieb Dan Carpenter:
> > It's simpler to just use snprintf() to print this to one buffer instead
> > of using strcpy() and strcat().  Also using snprintf() is slightly safer
> > than using sprintf().
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_acp.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_acp.c
> > index 9f8cfaa..d6b0bff 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_acp.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_acp.c
> > @@ -240,12 +240,10 @@ static int acp_poweron(struct generic_pm_domain *genpd)
> >  static struct device *get_mfd_cell_dev(const char *device_name, int r)
> >  {
> >  	char auto_dev_name[25];
> > -	char buf[8];
> >  	struct device *dev;
> >  
> > -	sprintf(buf, ".%d.auto", r);
> > -	strcpy(auto_dev_name, device_name);
> > -	strcat(auto_dev_name, buf);
> > +	snprintf(auto_dev_name, sizeof(auto_dev_name),
> > +		 "%s.%d.auto", device_name, r);
> >  	dev = bus_find_device_by_name(&platform_bus_type, NULL, auto_dev_name);
> >  	dev_info(dev, "device %s added to pm domain\n", auto_dev_name);
> >  
> 
> hi,
> i tried to understand what is the base for char auto_dev_name[25]. It is not clear
> from these snipped if that is large or small.
> 
> (To be aware i assume that
> get_mfd_cell_dev("terrible_long_and_Stupid_name",1234567899346712) will never happen
> but i could find no reason)
> 
> A small comment that explains the magic 25 would be nice.

I have no idea, either of course.  For example,
mc13xxx_add_subdevice_pdata() assumes device_name by itself can be 30
characters.  Hence the change to snprintf.

regards,
dan carpenter


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
To: walter harms <wharms@bfs.de>
Cc: Maruthi Srinivas Bayyavarapu <Maruthi.Bayyavarapu@amd.com>,
	Jammy Zhou <Jammy.Zhou@amd.com>,
	kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
	Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>,
	Murali Krishna Vemuri <murali-krishna.vemuri@amd.com>
Subject: Re: [patch] drm/amd: cleanup get_mfd_cell_dev()
Date: Sat, 27 Feb 2016 13:40:49 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160227104049.GN5273@mwanda> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <56D17170.80408@bfs.de>

On Sat, Feb 27, 2016 at 10:50:40AM +0100, walter harms wrote:
> 
> 
> Am 25.02.2016 08:47, schrieb Dan Carpenter:
> > It's simpler to just use snprintf() to print this to one buffer instead
> > of using strcpy() and strcat().  Also using snprintf() is slightly safer
> > than using sprintf().
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_acp.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_acp.c
> > index 9f8cfaa..d6b0bff 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_acp.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_acp.c
> > @@ -240,12 +240,10 @@ static int acp_poweron(struct generic_pm_domain *genpd)
> >  static struct device *get_mfd_cell_dev(const char *device_name, int r)
> >  {
> >  	char auto_dev_name[25];
> > -	char buf[8];
> >  	struct device *dev;
> >  
> > -	sprintf(buf, ".%d.auto", r);
> > -	strcpy(auto_dev_name, device_name);
> > -	strcat(auto_dev_name, buf);
> > +	snprintf(auto_dev_name, sizeof(auto_dev_name),
> > +		 "%s.%d.auto", device_name, r);
> >  	dev = bus_find_device_by_name(&platform_bus_type, NULL, auto_dev_name);
> >  	dev_info(dev, "device %s added to pm domain\n", auto_dev_name);
> >  
> 
> hi,
> i tried to understand what is the base for char auto_dev_name[25]. It is not clear
> from these snipped if that is large or small.
> 
> (To be aware i assume that
> get_mfd_cell_dev("terrible_long_and_Stupid_name",1234567899346712) will never happen
> but i could find no reason)
> 
> A small comment that explains the magic 25 would be nice.

I have no idea, either of course.  For example,
mc13xxx_add_subdevice_pdata() assumes device_name by itself can be 30
characters.  Hence the change to snprintf.

regards,
dan carpenter

_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
To: walter harms <wharms@bfs.de>
Cc: David Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>,
	Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>,
	Maruthi Srinivas Bayyavarapu <Maruthi.Bayyavarapu@amd.com>,
	Jammy Zhou <Jammy.Zhou@amd.com>,
	Murali Krishna Vemuri <murali-krishna.vemuri@amd.com>,
	Chunming Zhou <david1.zhou@amd.com>,
	dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch] drm/amd: cleanup get_mfd_cell_dev()
Date: Sat, 27 Feb 2016 13:40:49 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160227104049.GN5273@mwanda> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <56D17170.80408@bfs.de>

On Sat, Feb 27, 2016 at 10:50:40AM +0100, walter harms wrote:
> 
> 
> Am 25.02.2016 08:47, schrieb Dan Carpenter:
> > It's simpler to just use snprintf() to print this to one buffer instead
> > of using strcpy() and strcat().  Also using snprintf() is slightly safer
> > than using sprintf().
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_acp.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_acp.c
> > index 9f8cfaa..d6b0bff 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_acp.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_acp.c
> > @@ -240,12 +240,10 @@ static int acp_poweron(struct generic_pm_domain *genpd)
> >  static struct device *get_mfd_cell_dev(const char *device_name, int r)
> >  {
> >  	char auto_dev_name[25];
> > -	char buf[8];
> >  	struct device *dev;
> >  
> > -	sprintf(buf, ".%d.auto", r);
> > -	strcpy(auto_dev_name, device_name);
> > -	strcat(auto_dev_name, buf);
> > +	snprintf(auto_dev_name, sizeof(auto_dev_name),
> > +		 "%s.%d.auto", device_name, r);
> >  	dev = bus_find_device_by_name(&platform_bus_type, NULL, auto_dev_name);
> >  	dev_info(dev, "device %s added to pm domain\n", auto_dev_name);
> >  
> 
> hi,
> i tried to understand what is the base for char auto_dev_name[25]. It is not clear
> from these snipped if that is large or small.
> 
> (To be aware i assume that
> get_mfd_cell_dev("terrible_long_and_Stupid_name",1234567899346712) will never happen
> but i could find no reason)
> 
> A small comment that explains the magic 25 would be nice.

I have no idea, either of course.  For example,
mc13xxx_add_subdevice_pdata() assumes device_name by itself can be 30
characters.  Hence the change to snprintf.

regards,
dan carpenter

  reply	other threads:[~2016-02-27 10:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-02-25  7:47 [patch] drm/amd: cleanup get_mfd_cell_dev() Dan Carpenter
2016-02-25  7:47 ` Dan Carpenter
2016-02-25  7:47 ` Dan Carpenter
2016-02-26 17:46 ` Alex Deucher
2016-02-26 17:46   ` Alex Deucher
2016-02-26 17:46   ` Alex Deucher
2016-02-27  9:50 ` walter harms
2016-02-27  9:50   ` walter harms
2016-02-27 10:40   ` Dan Carpenter [this message]
2016-02-27 10:40     ` Dan Carpenter
2016-02-27 10:40     ` Dan Carpenter
2016-02-27 11:18     ` walter harms
2016-02-27 11:18       ` walter harms
2016-02-27 11:18       ` walter harms

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20160227104049.GN5273@mwanda \
    --to=dan.carpenter@oracle.com \
    --cc=Jammy.Zhou@amd.com \
    --cc=Maruthi.Bayyavarapu@amd.com \
    --cc=alexander.deucher@amd.com \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=murali-krishna.vemuri@amd.com \
    --cc=wharms@bfs.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.