From: Chris Bainbridge <chris.bainbridge@gmail.com>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/microcode: Change checksum to u32
Date: Sat, 27 Feb 2016 18:23:29 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160227182329.GA4947@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160227175118.GC5261@pd.tnic>
On Sat, Feb 27, 2016 at 06:51:18PM +0100, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 27, 2016 at 11:01:47AM +0000, Chris Bainbridge wrote:
> > Checksum should be unsigned 32-bit otherwise the calculation overflows
> > resulting in undefined behaviour:
> >
> > [ 0.000000] ================================================================================
> > [ 0.000000] UBSAN: Undefined behaviour in arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/intel_lib.c:105:12
> > [ 0.000000] signed integer overflow:
> > [ 0.000000] -1500151068 + -2125470173 cannot be represented in type 'int'
>
> So I've been staring at this error message for a while now and I'm
> having hard time understanding what it is telling me. Let's look at all
> three ints:
>
> * sum is computed here:
>
> sum = orig_sum
> - (mc_header->sig + mc_header->pf + mc_header->cksum)
> + (ext_sig->sig + ext_sig->pf + ext_sig->cksum);
>
> and checks mc_header against each extended signature. If it overflows, we abort:
>
> if (sum) {
> if (print_err)
> pr_err("aborting, bad checksum\n");
>
>
> * orig_sum in the above sum can only be 0:
>
> if (orig_sum) {
> if (print_err)
> pr_err("aborting, bad checksum\n");
> return -EINVAL;
>
> and it adds a bunch of integers which can overflow, sure, but if it
> overflows, we exit early.
>
> * and
>
> ext_sigcount = ext_header->count;
>
> so it is some count of extended signatures.
>
> So what is ubsan complaining about?
/* calculate the checksum */
orig_sum = 0;
i = (MC_HEADER_SIZE + data_size) / DWSIZE;
while (i--)
orig_sum += ((int *)mc)[i];
The checksum is the additive sum of all the 32-bit values, but 32-bit
addition overflow is undefined for signed ints. For comparison the
checksum function from iucode-tool uses u32:
intel_ucode_status_t intel_ucode_check_microcode(const void * const uc,
int strict)
{
...
uint32_t sum, orig_sum;
unsigned int i;
uint32_t *p;
...
/* Calculate the checksum. We exclude the extended table as it
* also has to have a zero checksum, in order to get better
* coverage */
orig_sum = 0;
i = (INTEL_UC_V1_HEADER_SIZE + data_size) / sizeof(uint32_t);
p = (uint32_t *)uc;
while (i--) {
orig_sum += *p;
p++;
}
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-02-27 18:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-02-27 11:01 [PATCH] x86/microcode: Change checksum to u32 Chris Bainbridge
2016-02-27 17:51 ` Borislav Petkov
2016-02-27 18:23 ` Chris Bainbridge [this message]
2016-02-27 19:44 ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2016-02-27 22:29 ` Borislav Petkov
2016-02-27 20:12 ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2016-03-16 10:52 ` Pavel Machek
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160227182329.GA4947@localhost \
--to=chris.bainbridge@gmail.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.