From: Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: "Dmitry Vyukov" <dvyukov@google.com>,
"Ian Kent" <raven@themaw.net>, "Mickaël Salaün" <mic@digikod.net>,
"linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
syzkaller <syzkaller@googlegroups.com>,
"Kostya Serebryany" <kcc@google.com>,
"Alexander Potapenko" <glider@google.com>,
"Sasha Levin" <sasha.levin@oracle.com>,
"David Howells" <dhowells@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: fs: NULL deref in atime_needs_update
Date: Mon, 29 Feb 2016 16:50:31 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160229165031.GY17997@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CA+55aFz3qdv+sEA_mk0mVQ8ZofkyberEzmh-ofVGXM4dciGEYA@mail.gmail.com>
On Mon, Feb 29, 2016 at 08:45:37AM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> > David, Linus, do you see any problems with that? To me it looks saner
> > that way and as cheap as the current code, but I might be missing something
> > here...
>
> I'd absolutely love to see this. The memory ordering for the flags
> updates and reading was always really confusing, and I hated how it
> was hidden inside the random access functions. And apparently it
> wasn't just confusing, it was buggy too.
>
> But I'd love it _more_ if this also means that we can get rid of the
> rmb's, which your patch didn't. Can we? Or does the ordering still
> remain for some other issue?
In __d_entry_type(), you mean? Should be, along with READ_ONCE() there.
AFAICS, ordering shouldn't be an issue anymore...
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-02-29 16:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 49+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-02-05 21:11 fs: NULL deref in atime_needs_update Dmitry Vyukov
2016-02-16 23:40 ` Mickaël Salaün
2016-02-19 19:32 ` Dmitry Vyukov
2016-02-20 3:21 ` Al Viro
2016-02-20 3:54 ` Al Viro
2016-02-20 3:54 ` Al Viro
2016-02-20 13:25 ` Mickaël Salaün
2016-02-20 17:10 ` Al Viro
2016-02-20 17:10 ` Al Viro
2016-02-20 20:26 ` Mickaël Salaün
2016-02-20 20:50 ` Al Viro
2016-02-20 20:50 ` Al Viro
2016-02-22 11:20 ` Dmitry Vyukov
2016-02-22 17:23 ` Al Viro
2016-02-23 15:34 ` Dmitry Vyukov
2016-02-23 18:17 ` Al Viro
2016-02-20 10:36 ` Dmitry Vyukov
2016-02-24 3:12 ` Ian Kent
2016-02-24 4:46 ` Al Viro
2016-02-24 4:46 ` Al Viro
2016-02-24 10:03 ` Dmitry Vyukov
2016-02-24 10:15 ` Dmitry Vyukov
2016-02-24 13:35 ` Dmitry Vyukov
2016-02-24 15:15 ` Al Viro
2016-02-25 8:29 ` Dmitry Vyukov
2016-02-25 16:39 ` Al Viro
2016-02-26 21:21 ` Al Viro
2016-02-26 21:25 ` Dmitry Vyukov
2016-02-26 22:07 ` Al Viro
2016-02-26 22:07 ` Al Viro
2016-02-27 22:27 ` Al Viro
2016-02-27 22:27 ` Al Viro
2016-02-28 15:43 ` Dmitry Vyukov
2016-02-28 16:04 ` Dmitry Vyukov
2016-02-28 17:01 ` Al Viro
2016-02-28 20:01 ` Al Viro
2016-02-29 9:38 ` Dmitry Vyukov
2016-02-29 12:34 ` Dmitry Vyukov
2016-02-29 16:11 ` Al Viro
2016-02-29 13:09 ` Al Viro
2016-02-29 13:43 ` David Howells
2016-02-29 15:54 ` Dmitry Vyukov
2016-02-29 16:19 ` Al Viro
2016-02-29 18:19 ` Dmitry Vyukov
2016-03-01 8:59 ` Dmitry Vyukov
2016-02-29 16:45 ` Linus Torvalds
2016-02-29 16:50 ` Al Viro [this message]
2016-02-29 17:20 ` Al Viro
2016-02-29 17:24 ` Linus Torvalds
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160229165031.GY17997@ZenIV.linux.org.uk \
--to=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=dvyukov@google.com \
--cc=glider@google.com \
--cc=kcc@google.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mic@digikod.net \
--cc=raven@themaw.net \
--cc=sasha.levin@oracle.com \
--cc=syzkaller@googlegroups.com \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.