* [commit cbf76b702] bcache: Really show state of work pending bit @ 2016-02-27 1:34 Eric Wheeler 2016-02-27 6:17 ` Greg KH 0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread From: Eric Wheeler @ 2016-02-27 1:34 UTC (permalink / raw) To: stable To whom it may concern: Please flag commit cbf76b702 for inclusion into stable branches. It applies cleanly in 4.1 (and likely 3.18). We have been testing it for a while. git diff --stat cbf76b702~1..cbf76b702 drivers/md/bcache/closure.c | 4 +--- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-) Thank you! -Eric -- Eric Wheeler, President eWheeler, Inc. dba Global Linux Security 888-LINUX26 (888-546-8926) Fax: 503-716-3878 PO Box 25107 www.GlobalLinuxSecurity.pro Linux since 1996! Portland, OR 97298 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [commit cbf76b702] bcache: Really show state of work pending bit 2016-02-27 1:34 [commit cbf76b702] bcache: Really show state of work pending bit Eric Wheeler @ 2016-02-27 6:17 ` Greg KH 2016-02-29 20:06 ` Eric Wheeler 0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread From: Greg KH @ 2016-02-27 6:17 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Eric Wheeler; +Cc: stable On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 05:34:19PM -0800, Eric Wheeler wrote: > To whom it may concern: > > Please flag commit cbf76b702 for inclusion into stable branches. It > applies cleanly in 4.1 (and likely 3.18). We have been testing it for a > while. > > git diff --stat cbf76b702~1..cbf76b702 > drivers/md/bcache/closure.c | 4 +--- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-) > > Thank you! $ git show cbf76b702 fatal: ambiguous argument 'cbf76b702': unknown revision or path not in the working tree. You are going to have to be a bit more specific... ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [commit cbf76b702] bcache: Really show state of work pending bit 2016-02-27 6:17 ` Greg KH @ 2016-02-29 20:06 ` Eric Wheeler 2016-02-29 21:29 ` Greg KH 0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread From: Eric Wheeler @ 2016-02-29 20:06 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Greg KH; +Cc: stable On Sat, 27 Feb 2016, Greg KH wrote: > On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 05:34:19PM -0800, Eric Wheeler wrote: > > To whom it may concern: > > > > Please flag commit cbf76b702 for inclusion into stable branches. It > > applies cleanly in 4.1 (and likely 3.18). We have been testing it for a > > while. > > > > git diff --stat cbf76b702~1..cbf76b702 > > drivers/md/bcache/closure.c | 4 +--- > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-) > > > > Thank you! > > $ git show cbf76b702 > fatal: ambiguous argument 'cbf76b702': unknown revision or path not in the working tree. > > You are going to have to be a bit more specific... This one: commit cbf76b702e85802683c166ad9067874bc3e1e843 Author: Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com> Date: Mon Oct 5 14:39:52 2015 +0200 bcache: Really show state of work pending bit WORK_STRUCT_PENDING is a mask for testing the pending bit. test_bit() expects the number of the bit and we need to use WORK_STRUCT_PENDING_BIT there. Also work_data_bits() is defined in workqueues.h now. I have noticed this just by chance when looking how WORK_STRUCT_PENDING_BIT is used. The change is compile tested. Signed-off-by: Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz> diff --git a/drivers/md/bcache/closure.c b/drivers/md/bcache/closure.c index 7a228de..9eaf1d6 100644 --- a/drivers/md/bcache/closure.c +++ b/drivers/md/bcache/closure.c @@ -167,8 +167,6 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(closure_debug_destroy); static struct dentry *debug; -#define work_data_bits(work) ((unsigned long *)(&(work)->data)) - static int debug_seq_show(struct seq_file *f, void *data) { struct closure *cl; @@ -182,7 +180,7 @@ static int debug_seq_show(struct seq_file *f, void *data) r & CLOSURE_REMAINING_MASK); seq_printf(f, "%s%s%s%s\n", - test_bit(WORK_STRUCT_PENDING, + test_bit(WORK_STRUCT_PENDING_BIT, work_data_bits(&cl->work)) ? "Q" : "", r & CLOSURE_RUNNING ? "R" : "", r & CLOSURE_STACK ? "S" : "", ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [commit cbf76b702] bcache: Really show state of work pending bit 2016-02-29 20:06 ` Eric Wheeler @ 2016-02-29 21:29 ` Greg KH 2016-02-29 22:06 ` Eric Wheeler 0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread From: Greg KH @ 2016-02-29 21:29 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Eric Wheeler; +Cc: stable On Mon, Feb 29, 2016 at 08:06:58PM +0000, Eric Wheeler wrote: > On Sat, 27 Feb 2016, Greg KH wrote: > > On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 05:34:19PM -0800, Eric Wheeler wrote: > > > To whom it may concern: > > > > > > Please flag commit cbf76b702 for inclusion into stable branches. It > > > applies cleanly in 4.1 (and likely 3.18). We have been testing it for a > > > while. > > > > > > git diff --stat cbf76b702~1..cbf76b702 > > > drivers/md/bcache/closure.c | 4 +--- > > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-) > > > > > > Thank you! > > > > $ git show cbf76b702 > > fatal: ambiguous argument 'cbf76b702': unknown revision or path not in the working tree. > > > > You are going to have to be a bit more specific... > > This one: > > > commit cbf76b702e85802683c166ad9067874bc3e1e843 > Author: Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com> > Date: Mon Oct 5 14:39:52 2015 +0200 There is no such commit in Linus's tree. confused, greg k-h ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [commit cbf76b702] bcache: Really show state of work pending bit 2016-02-29 21:29 ` Greg KH @ 2016-02-29 22:06 ` Eric Wheeler 2016-02-29 22:31 ` Greg KH 0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread From: Eric Wheeler @ 2016-02-29 22:06 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Greg KH; +Cc: stable On Mon, 29 Feb 2016, Greg KH wrote: > On Mon, Feb 29, 2016 at 08:06:58PM +0000, Eric Wheeler wrote: > > On Sat, 27 Feb 2016, Greg KH wrote: > > > On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 05:34:19PM -0800, Eric Wheeler wrote: > > > > To whom it may concern: > > > > > > > > Please flag commit cbf76b702 for inclusion into stable branches. It > > > > applies cleanly in 4.1 (and likely 3.18). We have been testing it for a > > > > while. > > > > > > > > git diff --stat cbf76b702~1..cbf76b702 > > > > drivers/md/bcache/closure.c | 4 +--- > > > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-) > > > > > > > > Thank you! > > > > > > $ git show cbf76b702 > > > fatal: ambiguous argument 'cbf76b702': unknown revision or path not in the working tree. > > > > > > You are going to have to be a bit more specific... > > > > This one: > > > > > > commit cbf76b702e85802683c166ad9067874bc3e1e843 > > Author: Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com> > > Date: Mon Oct 5 14:39:52 2015 +0200 > > There is no such commit in Linus's tree. Hmm, not sure where that commit hash came from then. Here it is properly: 8d090f47315507c3064ca4eefa9a1da52390b52e https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=8d090f47315507c3064ca4eefa9a1da52390b52e -Eric > > confused, > > greg k-h > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe stable" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [commit cbf76b702] bcache: Really show state of work pending bit 2016-02-29 22:06 ` Eric Wheeler @ 2016-02-29 22:31 ` Greg KH 2016-02-29 23:02 ` Eric Wheeler 0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread From: Greg KH @ 2016-02-29 22:31 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Eric Wheeler; +Cc: stable On Mon, Feb 29, 2016 at 10:06:05PM +0000, Eric Wheeler wrote: > On Mon, 29 Feb 2016, Greg KH wrote: > > > On Mon, Feb 29, 2016 at 08:06:58PM +0000, Eric Wheeler wrote: > > > On Sat, 27 Feb 2016, Greg KH wrote: > > > > On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 05:34:19PM -0800, Eric Wheeler wrote: > > > > > To whom it may concern: > > > > > > > > > > Please flag commit cbf76b702 for inclusion into stable branches. It > > > > > applies cleanly in 4.1 (and likely 3.18). We have been testing it for a > > > > > while. > > > > > > > > > > git diff --stat cbf76b702~1..cbf76b702 > > > > > drivers/md/bcache/closure.c | 4 +--- > > > > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-) > > > > > > > > > > Thank you! > > > > > > > > $ git show cbf76b702 > > > > fatal: ambiguous argument 'cbf76b702': unknown revision or path not in the working tree. > > > > > > > > You are going to have to be a bit more specific... > > > > > > This one: > > > > > > > > > commit cbf76b702e85802683c166ad9067874bc3e1e843 > > > Author: Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com> > > > Date: Mon Oct 5 14:39:52 2015 +0200 > > > > There is no such commit in Linus's tree. > > Hmm, not sure where that commit hash came from then. Here it is properly: > 8d090f47315507c3064ca4eefa9a1da52390b52e > > https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=8d090f47315507c3064ca4eefa9a1da52390b52e That's better. But this is just a debugging patch, for a debugfs file, how does it follow the rules outlined in Documentation/stable_kernel_rules.txt for what is acceptable for a stable kernel release? greg k-h ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [commit cbf76b702] bcache: Really show state of work pending bit 2016-02-29 22:31 ` Greg KH @ 2016-02-29 23:02 ` Eric Wheeler 0 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread From: Eric Wheeler @ 2016-02-29 23:02 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Greg KH; +Cc: stable On Mon, 29 Feb 2016, Greg KH wrote: > On Mon, Feb 29, 2016 at 10:06:05PM +0000, Eric Wheeler wrote: > > On Mon, 29 Feb 2016, Greg KH wrote: > > > > > On Mon, Feb 29, 2016 at 08:06:58PM +0000, Eric Wheeler wrote: > > > > On Sat, 27 Feb 2016, Greg KH wrote: > > > > > On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 05:34:19PM -0800, Eric Wheeler wrote: > > > > > > To whom it may concern: > > > > > > > > > > > > Please flag commit cbf76b702 for inclusion into stable branches. It > > > > > > applies cleanly in 4.1 (and likely 3.18). We have been testing it for a > > > > > > while. > > > > > > > > > > > > git diff --stat cbf76b702~1..cbf76b702 > > > > > > drivers/md/bcache/closure.c | 4 +--- > > > > > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-) > > > > > > > > > > > > Thank you! > > > > > > > > > > $ git show cbf76b702 > > > > > fatal: ambiguous argument 'cbf76b702': unknown revision or path not in the working tree. > > > > > > > > > > You are going to have to be a bit more specific... > > > > > > > > This one: > > > > > > > > > > > > commit cbf76b702e85802683c166ad9067874bc3e1e843 > > > > Author: Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com> > > > > Date: Mon Oct 5 14:39:52 2015 +0200 > > > > > > There is no such commit in Linus's tree. > > > > Hmm, not sure where that commit hash came from then. Here it is properly: > > 8d090f47315507c3064ca4eefa9a1da52390b52e > > > > https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=8d090f47315507c3064ca4eefa9a1da52390b52e > > That's better. > > But this is just a debugging patch, for a debugfs file, how does it > follow the rules outlined in Documentation/stable_kernel_rules.txt for > what is acceptable for a stable kernel release? Hmm, it seems that this patch doesn't do what I thought it did. Nevermind, I retract this request. -Eric > > greg k-h > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe stable" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2016-02-29 23:02 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 7+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2016-02-27 1:34 [commit cbf76b702] bcache: Really show state of work pending bit Eric Wheeler 2016-02-27 6:17 ` Greg KH 2016-02-29 20:06 ` Eric Wheeler 2016-02-29 21:29 ` Greg KH 2016-02-29 22:06 ` Eric Wheeler 2016-02-29 22:31 ` Greg KH 2016-02-29 23:02 ` Eric Wheeler
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.