From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
To: Xiao Guangrong <guangrong.xiao@linux.intel.com>
Cc: pbonzini@redhat.com, imammedo@redhat.com, gleb@kernel.org,
mtosatti@redhat.com, stefanha@redhat.com, rth@twiddle.net,
ehabkost@redhat.com, dan.j.williams@intel.com,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 5/8] nvdimm acpi: introduce patched dsm memory
Date: Tue, 1 Mar 2016 11:08:36 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160301090836.GA27812@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <56D55883.3090901@linux.intel.com>
On Tue, Mar 01, 2016 at 04:53:23PM +0800, Xiao Guangrong wrote:
>
>
> On 02/29/2016 05:38 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
>
> >+/* Build NAME(XXXX, 0x00000000) where 0x00000000 is encoded as a dword,
> >+ * and return the offset to 0x00000000 for runtime patching.
> >+ *
> >+ * Warning: runtime patching is best avoided. Only use this as
> >+ * a replacement for DataTableRegion (for guests that don't
> >+ * support it).
> >+ */
> >+int
> >+build_append_named_dword(GArray *array, const char *name_format, ...)
> >+{
> >+ int offset;
> >+ va_list ap;
> >+
> >+ va_start(ap, name_format);
> >+ build_append_namestringv(array, name_format, ap);
> >+ va_end(ap);
>
> The NameOP was missed here...
>
> The idea is great and i fixed and applied it on the top this patchset, the patch
> is attached, would it be good to you?
>
OK but I can't review this patch on top of patch.
Please split this in aml-build and nvdimm changes,
then squash the am-build change with my patch and include it
as 5/8, then append yours squashed with the nvdimm.c changes.
> >From 29a6803d244bbec807bd1df08aff4483ea776c9b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
> Date: Tue, 1 Mar 2016 16:33:49 +0800
> Subject: [PATCH] acpi: add build_append_named_dword, returning an offset in
> buffer
>
> This is a very limited form of support for runtime patching -
> similar in functionality to what we can do with ACPI_EXTRACT
> macros in python, but implemented in C.
>
> This is to allow ACPI code direct access to data tables -
> which is exactly what DataTableRegion is there for, except
> no known windows release so far implements DataTableRegion.
>
> [ Xiao: fixed missed NameOp and applied it to NVDIMM ACPI. ]
>
> Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Xiao Guangrong <guangrong.xiao@linux.intel.com>
> ---
> hw/acpi/aml-build.c | 1 +
> hw/acpi/nvdimm.c | 33 +++++++--------------------------
> 2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/hw/acpi/aml-build.c b/hw/acpi/aml-build.c
> index f40b93e..9d97ce8 100644
> --- a/hw/acpi/aml-build.c
> +++ b/hw/acpi/aml-build.c
> @@ -271,6 +271,7 @@ build_append_named_dword(GArray *array, const char *name_format, ...)
> int offset;
> va_list ap;
>
> + build_append_byte(array, 0x08); /* NameOp */
> va_start(ap, name_format);
> build_append_namestringv(array, name_format, ap);
> va_end(ap);
> diff --git a/hw/acpi/nvdimm.c b/hw/acpi/nvdimm.c
> index a6fbbee..fbdff76 100644
> --- a/hw/acpi/nvdimm.c
> +++ b/hw/acpi/nvdimm.c
> @@ -565,10 +565,9 @@ static void nvdimm_build_nvdimm_devices(GSList *device_list, Aml *root_dev)
> static void nvdimm_build_ssdt(GSList *device_list, GArray *table_offsets,
> GArray *table_data, GArray *linker)
> {
> - Aml *ssdt, *sb_scope, *dev, *field, *mem_addr;
> + Aml *ssdt, *sb_scope, *dev, *field;
> Aml *min_addr, *max_addr, *mr32, *method, *crs;
> - uint32_t zero_offset = 0;
> - int offset;
> + int offset, table_len;
>
> acpi_add_table(table_offsets, table_data);
>
> @@ -682,31 +681,13 @@ static void nvdimm_build_ssdt(GSList *device_list, GArray *table_offsets,
> nvdimm_build_nvdimm_devices(device_list, dev);
>
> aml_append(sb_scope, dev);
> + aml_append(ssdt, sb_scope);
>
> - /*
> - * leave it at the end of ssdt so that we can conveniently get the
> - * offset of int32 object which will be patched with the real address
> - * of the dsm memory by BIOS.
> - *
> - * 0x32000000 is the magic number to let aml_int() create int32 object.
> - * It will be zeroed later to make bios_linker_loader_add_pointer()
> - * happy.
> - */
> - mem_addr = aml_name_decl(NVDIMM_ACPI_MEM_ADDR, aml_int(0x32000000));
> + table_len = table_data->len;
Rename it something that implies what it does, not it's value. Offset of
what is it?
For example
nvdimm_ssdt = table_data->len;
>
> - aml_append(sb_scope, mem_addr);
> - aml_append(ssdt, sb_scope);
> /* copy AML table into ACPI tables blob and patch header there */
> g_array_append_vals(table_data, ssdt->buf->data, ssdt->buf->len);
> -
> - offset = table_data->len - 4;
> -
> - /*
> - * zero the last 4 bytes, i.e, it is the offset of
> - * NVDIMM_ACPI_MEM_ADDR object.
> - */
> - g_array_remove_range(table_data, offset, 4);
> - g_array_append_vals(table_data, &zero_offset, 4);
> + offset = build_append_named_dword(table_data, NVDIMM_ACPI_MEM_ADDR);
Here too, please give it a better name
mem_addr_offset = ....; ?
>
> bios_linker_loader_alloc(linker, NVDIMM_DSM_MEM_FILE, TARGET_PAGE_SIZE,
> false /* high memory */);
> @@ -715,8 +696,8 @@ static void nvdimm_build_ssdt(GSList *device_list, GArray *table_offsets,
> table_data->data + offset,
> sizeof(uint32_t));
> build_header(linker, table_data,
> - (void *)(table_data->data + table_data->len - ssdt->buf->len),
> - "SSDT", ssdt->buf->len, 1, NULL, "NVDIMM");
> + (void *)(table_data->data + table_len),
> + "SSDT", table_data->len - table_len, 1, NULL, "NVDIMM");
> free_aml_allocator();
> }
>
> --
> 1.8.3.1
>
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
To: Xiao Guangrong <guangrong.xiao@linux.intel.com>
Cc: ehabkost@redhat.com, kvm@vger.kernel.org, gleb@kernel.org,
mtosatti@redhat.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, stefanha@redhat.com,
imammedo@redhat.com, pbonzini@redhat.com,
dan.j.williams@intel.com, rth@twiddle.net
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 5/8] nvdimm acpi: introduce patched dsm memory
Date: Tue, 1 Mar 2016 11:08:36 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160301090836.GA27812@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <56D55883.3090901@linux.intel.com>
On Tue, Mar 01, 2016 at 04:53:23PM +0800, Xiao Guangrong wrote:
>
>
> On 02/29/2016 05:38 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
>
> >+/* Build NAME(XXXX, 0x00000000) where 0x00000000 is encoded as a dword,
> >+ * and return the offset to 0x00000000 for runtime patching.
> >+ *
> >+ * Warning: runtime patching is best avoided. Only use this as
> >+ * a replacement for DataTableRegion (for guests that don't
> >+ * support it).
> >+ */
> >+int
> >+build_append_named_dword(GArray *array, const char *name_format, ...)
> >+{
> >+ int offset;
> >+ va_list ap;
> >+
> >+ va_start(ap, name_format);
> >+ build_append_namestringv(array, name_format, ap);
> >+ va_end(ap);
>
> The NameOP was missed here...
>
> The idea is great and i fixed and applied it on the top this patchset, the patch
> is attached, would it be good to you?
>
OK but I can't review this patch on top of patch.
Please split this in aml-build and nvdimm changes,
then squash the am-build change with my patch and include it
as 5/8, then append yours squashed with the nvdimm.c changes.
> >From 29a6803d244bbec807bd1df08aff4483ea776c9b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
> Date: Tue, 1 Mar 2016 16:33:49 +0800
> Subject: [PATCH] acpi: add build_append_named_dword, returning an offset in
> buffer
>
> This is a very limited form of support for runtime patching -
> similar in functionality to what we can do with ACPI_EXTRACT
> macros in python, but implemented in C.
>
> This is to allow ACPI code direct access to data tables -
> which is exactly what DataTableRegion is there for, except
> no known windows release so far implements DataTableRegion.
>
> [ Xiao: fixed missed NameOp and applied it to NVDIMM ACPI. ]
>
> Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Xiao Guangrong <guangrong.xiao@linux.intel.com>
> ---
> hw/acpi/aml-build.c | 1 +
> hw/acpi/nvdimm.c | 33 +++++++--------------------------
> 2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/hw/acpi/aml-build.c b/hw/acpi/aml-build.c
> index f40b93e..9d97ce8 100644
> --- a/hw/acpi/aml-build.c
> +++ b/hw/acpi/aml-build.c
> @@ -271,6 +271,7 @@ build_append_named_dword(GArray *array, const char *name_format, ...)
> int offset;
> va_list ap;
>
> + build_append_byte(array, 0x08); /* NameOp */
> va_start(ap, name_format);
> build_append_namestringv(array, name_format, ap);
> va_end(ap);
> diff --git a/hw/acpi/nvdimm.c b/hw/acpi/nvdimm.c
> index a6fbbee..fbdff76 100644
> --- a/hw/acpi/nvdimm.c
> +++ b/hw/acpi/nvdimm.c
> @@ -565,10 +565,9 @@ static void nvdimm_build_nvdimm_devices(GSList *device_list, Aml *root_dev)
> static void nvdimm_build_ssdt(GSList *device_list, GArray *table_offsets,
> GArray *table_data, GArray *linker)
> {
> - Aml *ssdt, *sb_scope, *dev, *field, *mem_addr;
> + Aml *ssdt, *sb_scope, *dev, *field;
> Aml *min_addr, *max_addr, *mr32, *method, *crs;
> - uint32_t zero_offset = 0;
> - int offset;
> + int offset, table_len;
>
> acpi_add_table(table_offsets, table_data);
>
> @@ -682,31 +681,13 @@ static void nvdimm_build_ssdt(GSList *device_list, GArray *table_offsets,
> nvdimm_build_nvdimm_devices(device_list, dev);
>
> aml_append(sb_scope, dev);
> + aml_append(ssdt, sb_scope);
>
> - /*
> - * leave it at the end of ssdt so that we can conveniently get the
> - * offset of int32 object which will be patched with the real address
> - * of the dsm memory by BIOS.
> - *
> - * 0x32000000 is the magic number to let aml_int() create int32 object.
> - * It will be zeroed later to make bios_linker_loader_add_pointer()
> - * happy.
> - */
> - mem_addr = aml_name_decl(NVDIMM_ACPI_MEM_ADDR, aml_int(0x32000000));
> + table_len = table_data->len;
Rename it something that implies what it does, not it's value. Offset of
what is it?
For example
nvdimm_ssdt = table_data->len;
>
> - aml_append(sb_scope, mem_addr);
> - aml_append(ssdt, sb_scope);
> /* copy AML table into ACPI tables blob and patch header there */
> g_array_append_vals(table_data, ssdt->buf->data, ssdt->buf->len);
> -
> - offset = table_data->len - 4;
> -
> - /*
> - * zero the last 4 bytes, i.e, it is the offset of
> - * NVDIMM_ACPI_MEM_ADDR object.
> - */
> - g_array_remove_range(table_data, offset, 4);
> - g_array_append_vals(table_data, &zero_offset, 4);
> + offset = build_append_named_dword(table_data, NVDIMM_ACPI_MEM_ADDR);
Here too, please give it a better name
mem_addr_offset = ....; ?
>
> bios_linker_loader_alloc(linker, NVDIMM_DSM_MEM_FILE, TARGET_PAGE_SIZE,
> false /* high memory */);
> @@ -715,8 +696,8 @@ static void nvdimm_build_ssdt(GSList *device_list, GArray *table_offsets,
> table_data->data + offset,
> sizeof(uint32_t));
> build_header(linker, table_data,
> - (void *)(table_data->data + table_data->len - ssdt->buf->len),
> - "SSDT", ssdt->buf->len, 1, NULL, "NVDIMM");
> + (void *)(table_data->data + table_len),
> + "SSDT", table_data->len - table_len, 1, NULL, "NVDIMM");
> free_aml_allocator();
> }
>
> --
> 1.8.3.1
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-03-01 9:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-02-14 8:50 [PATCH v3 0/8] NVDIMM ACPI: introduce the framework of QEMU emulated DSM Xiao Guangrong
2016-02-14 8:50 ` [Qemu-devel] " Xiao Guangrong
2016-02-14 8:50 ` [PATCH v3 1/8] acpi: add aml_create_field() Xiao Guangrong
2016-02-14 8:50 ` [Qemu-devel] " Xiao Guangrong
2016-02-14 8:50 ` [PATCH v3 2/8] acpi: add aml_concatenate() Xiao Guangrong
2016-02-14 8:50 ` [Qemu-devel] " Xiao Guangrong
2016-02-15 9:19 ` Igor Mammedov
2016-02-15 9:19 ` [Qemu-devel] " Igor Mammedov
2016-02-14 8:51 ` [PATCH v3 3/8] acpi: allow using object as offset for OperationRegion Xiao Guangrong
2016-02-14 8:51 ` [Qemu-devel] " Xiao Guangrong
2016-02-14 8:51 ` [PATCH v3 4/8] nvdimm acpi: initialize the resource used by NVDIMM ACPI Xiao Guangrong
2016-02-14 8:51 ` [Qemu-devel] " Xiao Guangrong
2016-02-14 8:51 ` [PATCH v3 5/8] nvdimm acpi: introduce patched dsm memory Xiao Guangrong
2016-02-14 8:51 ` [Qemu-devel] " Xiao Guangrong
2016-02-29 9:38 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2016-02-29 9:38 ` [Qemu-devel] " Michael S. Tsirkin
2016-03-01 8:42 ` Xiao Guangrong
2016-03-01 8:42 ` [Qemu-devel] " Xiao Guangrong
2016-03-01 8:53 ` Xiao Guangrong
2016-03-01 8:53 ` [Qemu-devel] " Xiao Guangrong
2016-03-01 9:08 ` Michael S. Tsirkin [this message]
2016-03-01 9:08 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2016-03-01 9:18 ` Xiao Guangrong
2016-03-01 9:18 ` [Qemu-devel] " Xiao Guangrong
2016-02-14 8:51 ` [PATCH v3 6/8] nvdimm acpi: let qemu handle _DSM method Xiao Guangrong
2016-02-14 8:51 ` [Qemu-devel] " Xiao Guangrong
2016-02-14 8:51 ` [PATCH v3 7/8] nvdimm acpi: emulate dsm method Xiao Guangrong
2016-02-14 8:51 ` [Qemu-devel] " Xiao Guangrong
2016-02-14 8:51 ` [PATCH v3 8/8] nvdimm acpi: add _CRS Xiao Guangrong
2016-02-14 8:51 ` [Qemu-devel] " Xiao Guangrong
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160301090836.GA27812@redhat.com \
--to=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=ehabkost@redhat.com \
--cc=gleb@kernel.org \
--cc=guangrong.xiao@linux.intel.com \
--cc=imammedo@redhat.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=rth@twiddle.net \
--cc=stefanha@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.