From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
To: Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>
Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] xfs: update icsb freeblocks counter after extent deletion
Date: Tue, 1 Mar 2016 04:48:47 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160301124847.GA3540@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1456756170-51248-3-git-send-email-bfoster@redhat.com>
On Mon, Feb 29, 2016 at 09:29:29AM -0500, Brian Foster wrote:
> xfs_bunmapi() currently updates the icsb fdblocks counter, unreserves
> quota, etc. before the extent is deleted by xfs_bmap_del_extent(). The
> function has problems dividing up the indirect reserved blocks for
> scenarios where a single delalloc extent is split in two. Particularly,
> there aren't always enough blocks reserved for multiple extents in a
> single extent reservation.
>
> The solution to this problem is to allow the extent removal code to
> steal from the deleted extent to meet indirect reservation requirements.
> Move the block of code in xfs_bmapi() that updates the icsb fdblocks
> counter to after the call to xfs_bmap_del_extent() to allow the codepath
> to update the extent record before the free blocks are accounted. Also,
> reshuffle the code slightly so the delalloc accounting occurs near the
> xfs_bmap_del_extent() call to provide context for the comments.
>
> Signed-off-by: Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>
Looks fine,
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-03-01 12:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-02-29 14:29 [PATCH v2 0/3] fix up indlen reservations on extent split Brian Foster
2016-02-29 14:29 ` [PATCH RFC 1/3] xfs: debug mode forced buffered write failure Brian Foster
2016-03-01 12:55 ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-03-01 13:10 ` Brian Foster
2016-02-29 14:29 ` [PATCH 2/3] xfs: update icsb freeblocks counter after extent deletion Brian Foster
2016-03-01 12:48 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2016-02-29 14:29 ` [PATCH 3/3] xfs: borrow indirect blocks from freed extent when available Brian Foster
2016-03-01 13:00 ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-03-01 13:11 ` Brian Foster
2016-02-29 14:36 ` [PATCH v2 0/3] fix up indlen reservations on extent split Brian Foster
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160301124847.GA3540@infradead.org \
--to=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=bfoster@redhat.com \
--cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.