All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
To: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>
Cc: Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov@virtuozzo.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp>,
	David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] exit: clear TIF_MEMDIE after exit_task_work
Date: Tue, 1 Mar 2016 17:57:04 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160301175431-mutt-send-email-mst@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160301155212.GJ9461@dhcp22.suse.cz>

On Tue, Mar 01, 2016 at 04:52:12PM +0100, Michal Hocko wrote:
> [CCing vhost-net maintainer]
> 
> On Mon 29-02-16 20:02:09, Vladimir Davydov wrote:
> > An mm_struct may be pinned by a file. An example is vhost-net device
> > created by a qemu/kvm (see vhost_net_ioctl -> vhost_net_set_owner ->
> > vhost_dev_set_owner).
> 
> The more I think about that the more I am wondering whether this is
> actually OK and correct. Why does the driver have to pin the address
> space? Nothing really prevents from parallel tearing down of the address
> space anyway so the code cannot expect all the vmas to stay. Would it be
> enough to pin the mm_struct only?

I'll need to research this. It's a fact that as long as the
device is not stopped, vhost can attempt to access
the address space.

> I am not sure I understand the code properly but what prevents from
> the situation when a VHOST_SET_OWNER caller dies without calling
> VHOST_RESET_OWNER and so the mm would be pinned indefinitely?
> 
> [Keeping the reset of the email for reference]

We have:

static const struct file_operations vhost_net_fops = {
        .owner          = THIS_MODULE,
        .release        = vhost_net_release,
...
};

When caller dies and after fds are closed,
vhost_net_release calls vhost_dev_cleanup and that
drops the mm reference.

> > If such process gets OOM-killed, the reference to
> > its mm_struct will only be released from exit_task_work -> ____fput ->
> > __fput -> vhost_net_release -> vhost_dev_cleanup, which is called after
> > exit_mmap, where TIF_MEMDIE is cleared. As a result, we can start
> > selecting the next victim before giving the last one a chance to free
> > its memory. In practice, this leads to killing several VMs along with
> > the fattest one.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov@virtuozzo.com>
> > ---
> >  kernel/exit.c | 4 ++--
> >  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/kernel/exit.c b/kernel/exit.c
> > index fd90195667e1..cc50e12165f7 100644
> > --- a/kernel/exit.c
> > +++ b/kernel/exit.c
> > @@ -434,8 +434,6 @@ static void exit_mm(struct task_struct *tsk)
> >  	task_unlock(tsk);
> >  	mm_update_next_owner(mm);
> >  	mmput(mm);
> > -	if (test_thread_flag(TIF_MEMDIE))
> > -		exit_oom_victim(tsk);
> >  }
> >  
> >  static struct task_struct *find_alive_thread(struct task_struct *p)
> > @@ -746,6 +744,8 @@ void do_exit(long code)
> >  		disassociate_ctty(1);
> >  	exit_task_namespaces(tsk);
> >  	exit_task_work(tsk);
> > +	if (test_thread_flag(TIF_MEMDIE))
> > +		exit_oom_victim(tsk);
> >  	exit_thread();
> >  
> >  	/*
> > -- 
> > 2.1.4
> 
> -- 
> Michal Hocko
> SUSE Labs

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
To: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>
Cc: Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov@virtuozzo.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp>,
	David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] exit: clear TIF_MEMDIE after exit_task_work
Date: Tue, 1 Mar 2016 17:57:04 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160301175431-mutt-send-email-mst@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160301155212.GJ9461@dhcp22.suse.cz>

On Tue, Mar 01, 2016 at 04:52:12PM +0100, Michal Hocko wrote:
> [CCing vhost-net maintainer]
> 
> On Mon 29-02-16 20:02:09, Vladimir Davydov wrote:
> > An mm_struct may be pinned by a file. An example is vhost-net device
> > created by a qemu/kvm (see vhost_net_ioctl -> vhost_net_set_owner ->
> > vhost_dev_set_owner).
> 
> The more I think about that the more I am wondering whether this is
> actually OK and correct. Why does the driver have to pin the address
> space? Nothing really prevents from parallel tearing down of the address
> space anyway so the code cannot expect all the vmas to stay. Would it be
> enough to pin the mm_struct only?

I'll need to research this. It's a fact that as long as the
device is not stopped, vhost can attempt to access
the address space.

> I am not sure I understand the code properly but what prevents from
> the situation when a VHOST_SET_OWNER caller dies without calling
> VHOST_RESET_OWNER and so the mm would be pinned indefinitely?
> 
> [Keeping the reset of the email for reference]

We have:

static const struct file_operations vhost_net_fops = {
        .owner          = THIS_MODULE,
        .release        = vhost_net_release,
...
};

When caller dies and after fds are closed,
vhost_net_release calls vhost_dev_cleanup and that
drops the mm reference.

> > If such process gets OOM-killed, the reference to
> > its mm_struct will only be released from exit_task_work -> ____fput ->
> > __fput -> vhost_net_release -> vhost_dev_cleanup, which is called after
> > exit_mmap, where TIF_MEMDIE is cleared. As a result, we can start
> > selecting the next victim before giving the last one a chance to free
> > its memory. In practice, this leads to killing several VMs along with
> > the fattest one.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov@virtuozzo.com>
> > ---
> >  kernel/exit.c | 4 ++--
> >  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/kernel/exit.c b/kernel/exit.c
> > index fd90195667e1..cc50e12165f7 100644
> > --- a/kernel/exit.c
> > +++ b/kernel/exit.c
> > @@ -434,8 +434,6 @@ static void exit_mm(struct task_struct *tsk)
> >  	task_unlock(tsk);
> >  	mm_update_next_owner(mm);
> >  	mmput(mm);
> > -	if (test_thread_flag(TIF_MEMDIE))
> > -		exit_oom_victim(tsk);
> >  }
> >  
> >  static struct task_struct *find_alive_thread(struct task_struct *p)
> > @@ -746,6 +744,8 @@ void do_exit(long code)
> >  		disassociate_ctty(1);
> >  	exit_task_namespaces(tsk);
> >  	exit_task_work(tsk);
> > +	if (test_thread_flag(TIF_MEMDIE))
> > +		exit_oom_victim(tsk);
> >  	exit_thread();
> >  
> >  	/*
> > -- 
> > 2.1.4
> 
> -- 
> Michal Hocko
> SUSE Labs

  reply	other threads:[~2016-03-01 15:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-02-29 17:02 [PATCH] exit: clear TIF_MEMDIE after exit_task_work Vladimir Davydov
2016-02-29 17:02 ` Vladimir Davydov
2016-02-29 18:21 ` Michal Hocko
2016-02-29 18:21   ` Michal Hocko
2016-02-29 18:44   ` Michal Hocko
2016-02-29 18:44     ` Michal Hocko
2016-03-01 15:52 ` Michal Hocko
2016-03-01 15:52   ` Michal Hocko
2016-03-01 15:57   ` Michael S. Tsirkin [this message]
2016-03-01 15:57     ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2016-03-01 16:08     ` Michal Hocko
2016-03-01 16:08       ` Michal Hocko
2016-03-01 16:14       ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2016-03-01 16:14         ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2016-03-01 16:22       ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2016-03-01 16:22         ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2016-03-01 16:35         ` Michal Hocko
2016-03-01 16:35           ` Michal Hocko
2016-03-01 16:46           ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2016-03-01 16:46             ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2016-03-01 17:17             ` Michal Hocko
2016-03-01 17:17               ` Michal Hocko
2016-03-01 17:20               ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2016-03-01 17:20                 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2016-03-14 16:39                 ` Michal Hocko
2016-03-14 16:39                   ` Michal Hocko
2016-06-07 12:50                   ` Michal Hocko
2016-06-07 12:50                     ` Michal Hocko
2016-06-13 11:50                     ` Michal Hocko
2016-06-13 11:50                       ` Michal Hocko
2016-06-13 13:52                       ` Tetsuo Handa
2016-06-13 13:52                         ` Tetsuo Handa
2016-06-13 14:00                         ` Michal Hocko
2016-06-13 14:00                           ` Michal Hocko
2016-06-13 18:11                       ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2016-06-13 18:11                         ` Michael S. Tsirkin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20160301175431-mutt-send-email-mst@redhat.com \
    --to=mst@redhat.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
    --cc=penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp \
    --cc=rientjes@google.com \
    --cc=vdavydov@virtuozzo.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.