All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Lina Iyer <lina.iyer@linaro.org>
To: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
Cc: ulf.hansson@linaro.org, khilman@kernel.org, rjw@rjwysocki.net,
	linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	geert@linux-m68k.org, k.kozlowski@samsung.com,
	msivasub@codeaurora.org, agross@codeaurora.org,
	linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com,
	ahaslam@baylibre.com, mtitinger@baylibre.com,
	Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC v2 03/12] PM / cpu_domains: Setup PM domains for CPUs/clusters
Date: Tue, 1 Mar 2016 11:00:10 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160301180010.GK1440@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160226191016.GW28849@codeaurora.org>

On Fri, Feb 26 2016 at 12:10 -0700, Stephen Boyd wrote:
>On 02/12, Lina Iyer wrote:
>> diff --git a/drivers/base/power/cpu_domains.c b/drivers/base/power/cpu_domains.c
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 0000000..981592f
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/drivers/base/power/cpu_domains.c
>> @@ -0,0 +1,267 @@
>> +
>> +/* List of CPU PM domains we care about */
>> +static LIST_HEAD(of_cpu_pd_list);
>> +static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(cpu_pd_list_lock);
>
>Can this be a mutex?
>
Yes, will change. The init function would not be called from atomic context.

>> +	genpd = kzalloc(sizeof(*(genpd)), GFP_KERNEL);
>
>Drop extra parenthesis
>

>> +	/* Register the CPU genpd */
>> +	pr_debug("adding %s as CPU PM domain.\n", pd->genpd->name);
>
>Drop the full stop?
>
OK

>> +	kfree(genpd);
>> +	kfree(genpd->name);
>
>Switch order so that name is freed first to avoid junk deref here.
>
Sounds good.

>> +	kfree(pd);
>> +	return ERR_PTR(ret);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static struct generic_pm_domain *of_get_cpu_domain(struct device_node *dn,
>> +		const struct cpu_pd_ops *ops, int cpu)
>> +{

>> +	genpd = of_genpd_get_from_provider(&args);
>> +	if (!IS_ERR(genpd))
>> +		goto skip_parent;
>
>Why not just return genpd and drop the goto?
>
Ok

>> +	genpd = of_init_cpu_pm_domain(dn, ops);
>> +	if (IS_ERR(genpd))
>> +		return genpd;
>> +
>> +	/* Is there a domain provider for this domain? */
>> +	ret = of_parse_phandle_with_args(dn, "power-domains",
>> +			"#power-domain-cells", 0, &args);
>> +	of_node_put(dn);
>
>Shouldn't this be of_node_put(args.np)? I suppose it's the same
>so this isn't too important.
>
>> +	if (ret < 0)
>> +		goto skip_parent;
>> +
>> +	/* Find its parent and attach this domain to it, recursively */
>> +	parent = of_get_cpu_domain(args.np, ops, cpu);
>
>Except that we use the np here. So perhaps move the of_node_put()
>down to the skip_parent goto?
>
Ok

>> +	if (IS_ERR(parent)) {
>> +		struct cpu_pm_domain *cpu_pd, *parent_cpu_pd;
>> +
>> +		ret = pm_genpd_add_subdomain(genpd, parent);
>
>parent is an error pointer here... isn't this always going to
>fail? Maybe that should be if (!IS_ERR(parent)) up there?
>
Good catch. Yes, it should be.

>> +		/*
>> +		 * Reference parent domain for easy access.
>> +		 * Note: We could be attached to a domain that is not a
>> +		 * CPU PM domain in that case dont reference the parent.
>
>s/dont/don't/
>
Done.

>> +	dn = of_get_cpu_node(cpu, NULL);
>> +	if (!dn)
>> +		return -ENODEV;
>> +
>> +	dn = of_parse_phandle(dn, "power-domains", 0);
>> +	if (!dn)
>> +		return -ENODEV;
>> +	of_node_put(dn);
>
>This should be put after of_get_cpu_domain().
>
Thanks for this review, Stephen.

Thanks,
Lina

>> +
>> +	/* Find the genpd for this CPU, create if not found */
>> +	genpd = of_get_cpu_domain(dn, ops, cpu);
>> +	if (IS_ERR(genpd))
>> +		return PTR_ERR(genpd);
>> +
>> +	return cpu_pd_attach_cpu(cpu);
>> +}
>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(of_setup_cpu_pd_single);
>
>-- 
>Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
>a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: lina.iyer@linaro.org (Lina Iyer)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [RFC v2 03/12] PM / cpu_domains: Setup PM domains for CPUs/clusters
Date: Tue, 1 Mar 2016 11:00:10 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160301180010.GK1440@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160226191016.GW28849@codeaurora.org>

On Fri, Feb 26 2016 at 12:10 -0700, Stephen Boyd wrote:
>On 02/12, Lina Iyer wrote:
>> diff --git a/drivers/base/power/cpu_domains.c b/drivers/base/power/cpu_domains.c
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 0000000..981592f
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/drivers/base/power/cpu_domains.c
>> @@ -0,0 +1,267 @@
>> +
>> +/* List of CPU PM domains we care about */
>> +static LIST_HEAD(of_cpu_pd_list);
>> +static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(cpu_pd_list_lock);
>
>Can this be a mutex?
>
Yes, will change. The init function would not be called from atomic context.

>> +	genpd = kzalloc(sizeof(*(genpd)), GFP_KERNEL);
>
>Drop extra parenthesis
>

>> +	/* Register the CPU genpd */
>> +	pr_debug("adding %s as CPU PM domain.\n", pd->genpd->name);
>
>Drop the full stop?
>
OK

>> +	kfree(genpd);
>> +	kfree(genpd->name);
>
>Switch order so that name is freed first to avoid junk deref here.
>
Sounds good.

>> +	kfree(pd);
>> +	return ERR_PTR(ret);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static struct generic_pm_domain *of_get_cpu_domain(struct device_node *dn,
>> +		const struct cpu_pd_ops *ops, int cpu)
>> +{

>> +	genpd = of_genpd_get_from_provider(&args);
>> +	if (!IS_ERR(genpd))
>> +		goto skip_parent;
>
>Why not just return genpd and drop the goto?
>
Ok

>> +	genpd = of_init_cpu_pm_domain(dn, ops);
>> +	if (IS_ERR(genpd))
>> +		return genpd;
>> +
>> +	/* Is there a domain provider for this domain? */
>> +	ret = of_parse_phandle_with_args(dn, "power-domains",
>> +			"#power-domain-cells", 0, &args);
>> +	of_node_put(dn);
>
>Shouldn't this be of_node_put(args.np)? I suppose it's the same
>so this isn't too important.
>
>> +	if (ret < 0)
>> +		goto skip_parent;
>> +
>> +	/* Find its parent and attach this domain to it, recursively */
>> +	parent = of_get_cpu_domain(args.np, ops, cpu);
>
>Except that we use the np here. So perhaps move the of_node_put()
>down to the skip_parent goto?
>
Ok

>> +	if (IS_ERR(parent)) {
>> +		struct cpu_pm_domain *cpu_pd, *parent_cpu_pd;
>> +
>> +		ret = pm_genpd_add_subdomain(genpd, parent);
>
>parent is an error pointer here... isn't this always going to
>fail? Maybe that should be if (!IS_ERR(parent)) up there?
>
Good catch. Yes, it should be.

>> +		/*
>> +		 * Reference parent domain for easy access.
>> +		 * Note: We could be attached to a domain that is not a
>> +		 * CPU PM domain in that case dont reference the parent.
>
>s/dont/don't/
>
Done.

>> +	dn = of_get_cpu_node(cpu, NULL);
>> +	if (!dn)
>> +		return -ENODEV;
>> +
>> +	dn = of_parse_phandle(dn, "power-domains", 0);
>> +	if (!dn)
>> +		return -ENODEV;
>> +	of_node_put(dn);
>
>This should be put after of_get_cpu_domain().
>
Thanks for this review, Stephen.

Thanks,
Lina

>> +
>> +	/* Find the genpd for this CPU, create if not found */
>> +	genpd = of_get_cpu_domain(dn, ops, cpu);
>> +	if (IS_ERR(genpd))
>> +		return PTR_ERR(genpd);
>> +
>> +	return cpu_pd_attach_cpu(cpu);
>> +}
>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(of_setup_cpu_pd_single);
>
>-- 
>Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
>a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project

  reply	other threads:[~2016-03-01 18:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 68+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-02-12 20:50 [RFC v2 00/12] PM: SoC idle support using PM domains Lina Iyer
2016-02-12 20:50 ` Lina Iyer
2016-02-12 20:50 ` [RFC v2 01/12] PM / Domains: Abstract genpd locking Lina Iyer
2016-02-12 20:50   ` Lina Iyer
2016-02-26 18:08   ` Stephen Boyd
2016-02-26 18:08     ` Stephen Boyd
2016-03-01 16:55     ` Lina Iyer
2016-03-01 16:55       ` Lina Iyer
2016-02-12 20:50 ` [RFC v2 02/12] PM / Domains: Support IRQ safe PM domains Lina Iyer
2016-02-12 20:50   ` Lina Iyer
2016-02-26 18:17   ` Stephen Boyd
2016-02-26 18:17     ` Stephen Boyd
2016-03-01 17:44     ` Lina Iyer
2016-03-01 17:44       ` Lina Iyer
2016-02-12 20:50 ` [RFC v2 03/12] PM / cpu_domains: Setup PM domains for CPUs/clusters Lina Iyer
2016-02-12 20:50   ` Lina Iyer
2016-02-17 23:38   ` Lina Iyer
2016-02-17 23:38     ` Lina Iyer
2016-02-18 17:29   ` [BUG FIX] PM / cpu_domains: Check for NULL callbacks Lina Iyer
2016-02-18 17:29     ` Lina Iyer
2016-02-18 17:46     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-02-18 17:46       ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-02-18 22:51       ` Lina Iyer
2016-02-18 22:51         ` Lina Iyer
2016-02-26 19:10   ` [RFC v2 03/12] PM / cpu_domains: Setup PM domains for CPUs/clusters Stephen Boyd
2016-02-26 19:10     ` Stephen Boyd
2016-03-01 18:00     ` Lina Iyer [this message]
2016-03-01 18:00       ` Lina Iyer
2016-02-12 20:50 ` [RFC v2 04/12] ARM: cpuidle: Add runtime PM support for CPUs Lina Iyer
2016-02-12 20:50   ` Lina Iyer
2016-02-26 18:24   ` Stephen Boyd
2016-02-26 18:24     ` Stephen Boyd
2016-03-01 18:36     ` Lina Iyer
2016-03-01 18:36       ` Lina Iyer
2016-02-12 20:50 ` [RFC v2 05/12] timer: Export next wake up of a CPU Lina Iyer
2016-02-12 20:50   ` Lina Iyer
2016-02-12 20:50 ` [RFC v2 06/12] PM / cpu_domains: Record CPUs that are part of the domain Lina Iyer
2016-02-12 20:50   ` Lina Iyer
2016-02-26 19:20   ` Stephen Boyd
2016-02-26 19:20     ` Stephen Boyd
2016-03-01 19:24     ` Lina Iyer
2016-03-01 19:24       ` Lina Iyer
2016-02-12 20:50 ` [RFC v2 07/12] PM / cpu_domains: Add PM Domain governor for CPUs Lina Iyer
2016-02-12 20:50   ` Lina Iyer
2016-02-26 19:33   ` Stephen Boyd
2016-02-26 19:33     ` Stephen Boyd
2016-03-01 19:32     ` Lina Iyer
2016-03-01 19:32       ` Lina Iyer
2016-03-01 19:35       ` Stephen Boyd
2016-03-01 19:35         ` Stephen Boyd
2016-02-12 20:50 ` [RFC v2 08/12] Documentation / cpu_domains: Describe CPU PM domains setup and governor Lina Iyer
2016-02-12 20:50   ` Lina Iyer
2016-02-26 19:43   ` Stephen Boyd
2016-02-26 19:43     ` Stephen Boyd
2016-03-01 19:36     ` Lina Iyer
2016-03-01 19:36       ` Lina Iyer
2016-02-12 20:50 ` [RFC v2 09/12] drivers: firmware: psci: Allow OS Initiated suspend mode Lina Iyer
2016-02-12 20:50   ` Lina Iyer
2016-02-12 20:50 ` [RFC v2 10/12] ARM64: psci: Support cluster idle states for OS-Initiated Lina Iyer
2016-02-12 20:50   ` Lina Iyer
2016-02-12 20:50 ` [RFC v2 11/12] ARM64: dts: Add PSCI cpuidle support for MSM8916 Lina Iyer
2016-02-12 20:50   ` Lina Iyer
2016-02-12 20:50 ` [RFC v2 12/12] ARM64: dts: Define CPU power domain " Lina Iyer
2016-02-12 20:50   ` Lina Iyer
2016-02-26 19:50   ` Stephen Boyd
2016-02-26 19:50     ` Stephen Boyd
2016-03-01 19:41     ` Lina Iyer
2016-03-01 19:41       ` Lina Iyer

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20160301180010.GK1440@linaro.org \
    --to=lina.iyer@linaro.org \
    --cc=agross@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=ahaslam@baylibre.com \
    --cc=daniel.lezcano@linaro.org \
    --cc=geert@linux-m68k.org \
    --cc=k.kozlowski@samsung.com \
    --cc=khilman@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com \
    --cc=msivasub@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=mtitinger@baylibre.com \
    --cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
    --cc=sboyd@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=ulf.hansson@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.