All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: vinod.koul@intel.com (Vinod Koul)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] dma: sun4i: expose block size and wait cycle configuration to DMA users
Date: Tue, 8 Mar 2016 15:29:04 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160308095904.GM11154@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160308075131.GE8418@lukather>

On Tue, Mar 08, 2016 at 08:51:31AM +0100, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> > > > > > + * struct sun4i_dma_chan_config - DMA channel config
> > > > > > + *
> > > > > > + * @para: contains information about block size and time before checking
> > > > > > + *	  DRQ line. This is device specific and only applicable to dedicated
> > > > > > + *	  DMA channels
> > > > > 
> > > > > What information, can you elobrate.. And why can't you use existing
> > > > > dma_slave_config for this?
> > > > 
> > > > Block size is related to the device FIFO size. I guess it allows the
> > > > DMA channel to launch a transfer of X bytes without having to check the
> > > > DRQ line (the line telling the DMA engine it can transfer more data
> > > > to/from the device). The wait cycles information is apparently related
> > > > to the number of clks the engine should wait before polling/checking
> > > > the DRQ line status between each block transfer. I'm not sure what it
> > > > saves to put WAIT_CYCLES() to something != 1, but in their BSP,
> > > > Allwinner tweak that depending on the device.
> > 
> > we already have block size aka src/dst_maxburst, why not use that one.
> 
> I'm not sure it's really the same thing. The DMA controller also has a
> burst parameter, that is either 1 byte or 8 bytes, and ends up being
> different from this one.

Nope that is buswidth. maxburst is words which cna be sent to device FIFO.
> 
> > Why does dmaengine need to wait? Can you explain that
> 
> We have no idea, we thought you might have one :)

Well that is hardware dependent. From DMAengine API usage we dont ahve to
wait at all. We should submit next descriptor as soon as possible.

> It doesn't really makes sense to us, but it does have a significant
> impact on the throughput.

-- 
~Vinod
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/attachments/20160308/d2bb0296/attachment.sig>

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@intel.com>
To: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com>
Cc: "Boris Brezillon" <boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com>,
	"Dan Williams" <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
	dmaengine@vger.kernel.org, "Chen-Yu Tsai" <wens@csie.org>,
	linux-sunxi@googlegroups.com,
	"Emilio López" <emilio@elopez.com.ar>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dma: sun4i: expose block size and wait cycle configuration to DMA users
Date: Tue, 8 Mar 2016 15:29:04 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160308095904.GM11154@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160308075131.GE8418@lukather>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1813 bytes --]

On Tue, Mar 08, 2016 at 08:51:31AM +0100, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> > > > > > + * struct sun4i_dma_chan_config - DMA channel config
> > > > > > + *
> > > > > > + * @para: contains information about block size and time before checking
> > > > > > + *	  DRQ line. This is device specific and only applicable to dedicated
> > > > > > + *	  DMA channels
> > > > > 
> > > > > What information, can you elobrate.. And why can't you use existing
> > > > > dma_slave_config for this?
> > > > 
> > > > Block size is related to the device FIFO size. I guess it allows the
> > > > DMA channel to launch a transfer of X bytes without having to check the
> > > > DRQ line (the line telling the DMA engine it can transfer more data
> > > > to/from the device). The wait cycles information is apparently related
> > > > to the number of clks the engine should wait before polling/checking
> > > > the DRQ line status between each block transfer. I'm not sure what it
> > > > saves to put WAIT_CYCLES() to something != 1, but in their BSP,
> > > > Allwinner tweak that depending on the device.
> > 
> > we already have block size aka src/dst_maxburst, why not use that one.
> 
> I'm not sure it's really the same thing. The DMA controller also has a
> burst parameter, that is either 1 byte or 8 bytes, and ends up being
> different from this one.

Nope that is buswidth. maxburst is words which cna be sent to device FIFO.
> 
> > Why does dmaengine need to wait? Can you explain that
> 
> We have no idea, we thought you might have one :)

Well that is hardware dependent. From DMAengine API usage we dont ahve to
wait at all. We should submit next descriptor as soon as possible.

> It doesn't really makes sense to us, but it does have a significant
> impact on the throughput.

-- 
~Vinod

[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 819 bytes --]

  parent reply	other threads:[~2016-03-08  9:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 64+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-03-07  9:59 [PATCH] dma: sun4i: expose block size and wait cycle configuration to DMA users Boris Brezillon
2016-03-07  9:59 ` Boris Brezillon
2016-03-07 14:54 ` Vinod Koul
2016-03-07 14:54   ` Vinod Koul
2016-03-07 15:08   ` Boris Brezillon
2016-03-07 15:08     ` Boris Brezillon
2016-03-07 20:30     ` Maxime Ripard
2016-03-07 20:30       ` Maxime Ripard
2016-03-08  2:55       ` Vinod Koul
2016-03-08  2:55         ` Vinod Koul
2016-03-08  2:59         ` Vinod Koul
2016-03-08  2:59           ` Vinod Koul
2016-03-08  7:51         ` Maxime Ripard
2016-03-08  7:51           ` Maxime Ripard
2016-03-08  8:42           ` [linux-sunxi] " Hans de Goede
2016-03-08  8:42             ` Hans de Goede
2016-03-08 10:05             ` Vinod Koul
2016-03-08 10:05               ` Vinod Koul
2016-03-09 10:58               ` Maxime Ripard
2016-03-09 10:58                 ` Maxime Ripard
2016-03-08  8:46           ` Boris Brezillon
2016-03-08  8:46             ` Boris Brezillon
2016-03-08  9:10             ` [linux-sunxi] " Priit Laes
2016-03-08  9:10               ` Priit Laes
2016-03-08 10:04             ` Vinod Koul
2016-03-08 10:04               ` Vinod Koul
2016-03-09 10:08             ` [linux-sunxi] " LABBE Corentin
2016-03-09 10:08               ` LABBE Corentin
2016-03-08  9:59           ` Vinod Koul [this message]
2016-03-08  9:59             ` Vinod Koul
2016-03-09 10:14         ` Boris Brezillon
2016-03-09 10:14           ` Boris Brezillon
2016-03-11  6:24           ` Vinod Koul
2016-03-11  6:24             ` Vinod Koul
2016-03-11  9:40             ` Boris Brezillon
2016-03-11  9:40               ` Boris Brezillon
2016-03-11 10:06               ` Vinod Koul
2016-03-11 10:06                 ` Vinod Koul
2016-03-11 10:26                 ` Boris Brezillon
2016-03-11 10:26                   ` Boris Brezillon
2016-03-11 11:21                   ` Vinod Koul
2016-03-11 11:21                     ` Vinod Koul
2016-03-09 11:06         ` Boris Brezillon
2016-03-09 11:06           ` Boris Brezillon
2016-03-11  6:26           ` Vinod Koul
2016-03-11  6:26             ` Vinod Koul
2016-03-11  9:45             ` Boris Brezillon
2016-03-11  9:45               ` Boris Brezillon
2016-03-11 10:09               ` Vinod Koul
2016-03-11 10:09                 ` Vinod Koul
2016-03-11 10:55                 ` Maxime Ripard
2016-03-11 10:55                   ` Maxime Ripard
2016-03-11 11:18                   ` Vinod Koul
2016-03-11 11:18                     ` Vinod Koul
2016-03-14 11:46                     ` Maxime Ripard
2016-03-14 11:46                       ` Maxime Ripard
2016-03-16  3:22                       ` Vinod Koul
2016-03-16  3:22                         ` Vinod Koul
2016-03-07 15:30 ` [linux-sunxi] " Priit Laes
2016-03-07 15:30   ` Priit Laes
2016-03-07 15:47   ` Boris Brezillon
2016-03-07 15:47     ` Boris Brezillon
2016-03-07 17:15     ` Emilio López
2016-03-07 17:15       ` Emilio López

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20160308095904.GM11154@localhost \
    --to=vinod.koul@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.