From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
To: Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@hpe.com>
Cc: bp@suse.de, dan.j.williams@intel.com, rjw@rjwysocki.net,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org,
linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2-UPDATE 3/4] resource: Add device-managed insert/remove_resource()
Date: Tue, 8 Mar 2016 13:02:53 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160308120253.GA3599@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1457108082-4610-1-git-send-email-toshi.kani@hpe.com>
* Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@hpe.com> wrote:
> +/**
> + * devm_insert_resource() - insert an I/O or memory resource
> + * @dev: device for which to produce the resource
> + * @root: root of the resource tree
> + * @new: descriptor of the new resource
> + *
> + * This is a device-managed version of insert_resource(). There is usually
> + * no need to release resources requested by this function explicitly since
s/explicitly since
/explicitly, since
> + * that will be taken care of when the device is unbound from its bus driver.
> + * If for some reason the resource needs to be released explicitly, because
> + * of ordering issues for example, bus drivers must call devm_remove_resource()
> + * rather than the regular remove_resource().
> + *
> + * devm_insert_resource() is intended for producers of resources, such as
> + * FW modules and bus drivers.
> + *
> + * Returns 0 on success or a negative error code on failure.
> + */
> +int devm_insert_resource(struct device *dev, struct resource *root,
> + struct resource *new)
> +{
> + struct resource **ptr;
> + int ret;
> +
> + ptr = devres_alloc(__devm_remove_resource, sizeof(*ptr), GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!ptr)
> + return -ENOMEM;
> +
> + *ptr = new;
> +
> + ret = insert_resource(root, new);
> + if (ret) {
> + dev_err(dev, "unable to insert resource: %pR (%d)\n", new, ret);
> + devres_free(ptr);
> + return -EBUSY;
Why not return 'ret' here, instead of -EBUSY?
> + }
> +
> + devres_add(dev, ptr);
> + return 0;
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(devm_insert_resource);
> +
> +/**
> + * devm_remove_resource() - remove a previously inserted resource
> + * @dev: device for which to remove the resource
> + * @old: descriptor of the resource
> + *
> + * Remove a resource previously inserted using devm_insert_resource().
> + *
> + * devm_remove_resource() is intended for producers of resources, such as
> + * FW modules and bus drivers.
> + */
> +void devm_remove_resource(struct device *dev, struct resource *old)
> +{
> + WARN_ON(devres_release(dev, __devm_remove_resource, devm_resource_match,
> + old));
So generally we don't put functions with side effects into WARN_ON()s. Just like
BUG_ON(), in the future it might be disabled on certain Kconfigs, etc. - and it's
also bad for readability.
Also, please use WARN_ON_ONCE().
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(devm_remove_resource);
> +
> +/*
> * Called from init/main.c to reserve IO ports.
> */
> #define MAXRESERVE 4
Looks good to me otherwise.
Thanks,
Ingo
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
To: Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@hpe.com>
Cc: linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org, rjw@rjwysocki.net,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
bp@suse.de, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
akpm@linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2-UPDATE 3/4] resource: Add device-managed insert/remove_resource()
Date: Tue, 8 Mar 2016 13:02:53 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160308120253.GA3599@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1457108082-4610-1-git-send-email-toshi.kani@hpe.com>
* Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@hpe.com> wrote:
> +/**
> + * devm_insert_resource() - insert an I/O or memory resource
> + * @dev: device for which to produce the resource
> + * @root: root of the resource tree
> + * @new: descriptor of the new resource
> + *
> + * This is a device-managed version of insert_resource(). There is usually
> + * no need to release resources requested by this function explicitly since
s/explicitly since
/explicitly, since
> + * that will be taken care of when the device is unbound from its bus driver.
> + * If for some reason the resource needs to be released explicitly, because
> + * of ordering issues for example, bus drivers must call devm_remove_resource()
> + * rather than the regular remove_resource().
> + *
> + * devm_insert_resource() is intended for producers of resources, such as
> + * FW modules and bus drivers.
> + *
> + * Returns 0 on success or a negative error code on failure.
> + */
> +int devm_insert_resource(struct device *dev, struct resource *root,
> + struct resource *new)
> +{
> + struct resource **ptr;
> + int ret;
> +
> + ptr = devres_alloc(__devm_remove_resource, sizeof(*ptr), GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!ptr)
> + return -ENOMEM;
> +
> + *ptr = new;
> +
> + ret = insert_resource(root, new);
> + if (ret) {
> + dev_err(dev, "unable to insert resource: %pR (%d)\n", new, ret);
> + devres_free(ptr);
> + return -EBUSY;
Why not return 'ret' here, instead of -EBUSY?
> + }
> +
> + devres_add(dev, ptr);
> + return 0;
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(devm_insert_resource);
> +
> +/**
> + * devm_remove_resource() - remove a previously inserted resource
> + * @dev: device for which to remove the resource
> + * @old: descriptor of the resource
> + *
> + * Remove a resource previously inserted using devm_insert_resource().
> + *
> + * devm_remove_resource() is intended for producers of resources, such as
> + * FW modules and bus drivers.
> + */
> +void devm_remove_resource(struct device *dev, struct resource *old)
> +{
> + WARN_ON(devres_release(dev, __devm_remove_resource, devm_resource_match,
> + old));
So generally we don't put functions with side effects into WARN_ON()s. Just like
BUG_ON(), in the future it might be disabled on certain Kconfigs, etc. - and it's
also bad for readability.
Also, please use WARN_ON_ONCE().
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(devm_remove_resource);
> +
> +/*
> * Called from init/main.c to reserve IO ports.
> */
> #define MAXRESERVE 4
Looks good to me otherwise.
Thanks,
Ingo
_______________________________________________
Linux-nvdimm mailing list
Linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org
https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-nvdimm
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
To: Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@hpe.com>
Cc: bp@suse.de, dan.j.williams@intel.com, rjw@rjwysocki.net,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-nvdimm@ml01.01.org,
linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2-UPDATE 3/4] resource: Add device-managed insert/remove_resource()
Date: Tue, 8 Mar 2016 13:02:53 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160308120253.GA3599@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1457108082-4610-1-git-send-email-toshi.kani@hpe.com>
* Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@hpe.com> wrote:
> +/**
> + * devm_insert_resource() - insert an I/O or memory resource
> + * @dev: device for which to produce the resource
> + * @root: root of the resource tree
> + * @new: descriptor of the new resource
> + *
> + * This is a device-managed version of insert_resource(). There is usually
> + * no need to release resources requested by this function explicitly since
s/explicitly since
/explicitly, since
> + * that will be taken care of when the device is unbound from its bus driver.
> + * If for some reason the resource needs to be released explicitly, because
> + * of ordering issues for example, bus drivers must call devm_remove_resource()
> + * rather than the regular remove_resource().
> + *
> + * devm_insert_resource() is intended for producers of resources, such as
> + * FW modules and bus drivers.
> + *
> + * Returns 0 on success or a negative error code on failure.
> + */
> +int devm_insert_resource(struct device *dev, struct resource *root,
> + struct resource *new)
> +{
> + struct resource **ptr;
> + int ret;
> +
> + ptr = devres_alloc(__devm_remove_resource, sizeof(*ptr), GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!ptr)
> + return -ENOMEM;
> +
> + *ptr = new;
> +
> + ret = insert_resource(root, new);
> + if (ret) {
> + dev_err(dev, "unable to insert resource: %pR (%d)\n", new, ret);
> + devres_free(ptr);
> + return -EBUSY;
Why not return 'ret' here, instead of -EBUSY?
> + }
> +
> + devres_add(dev, ptr);
> + return 0;
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(devm_insert_resource);
> +
> +/**
> + * devm_remove_resource() - remove a previously inserted resource
> + * @dev: device for which to remove the resource
> + * @old: descriptor of the resource
> + *
> + * Remove a resource previously inserted using devm_insert_resource().
> + *
> + * devm_remove_resource() is intended for producers of resources, such as
> + * FW modules and bus drivers.
> + */
> +void devm_remove_resource(struct device *dev, struct resource *old)
> +{
> + WARN_ON(devres_release(dev, __devm_remove_resource, devm_resource_match,
> + old));
So generally we don't put functions with side effects into WARN_ON()s. Just like
BUG_ON(), in the future it might be disabled on certain Kconfigs, etc. - and it's
also bad for readability.
Also, please use WARN_ON_ONCE().
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(devm_remove_resource);
> +
> +/*
> * Called from init/main.c to reserve IO ports.
> */
> #define MAXRESERVE 4
Looks good to me otherwise.
Thanks,
Ingo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-03-08 12:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-03-04 16:14 [PATCH v2-UPDATE 3/4] resource: Add device-managed insert/remove_resource() Toshi Kani
2016-03-04 16:14 ` Toshi Kani
2016-03-04 16:14 ` Toshi Kani
2016-03-07 18:14 ` Dan Williams
2016-03-07 18:14 ` Dan Williams
2016-03-07 18:14 ` Dan Williams
2016-03-07 23:03 ` Toshi Kani
2016-03-07 23:03 ` Toshi Kani
2016-03-07 23:03 ` Toshi Kani
2016-03-08 2:21 ` Dan Williams
2016-03-08 2:21 ` Dan Williams
2016-03-08 2:21 ` Dan Williams
2016-03-08 12:02 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2016-03-08 12:02 ` Ingo Molnar
2016-03-08 12:02 ` Ingo Molnar
2016-03-08 17:41 ` Toshi Kani
2016-03-08 17:41 ` Toshi Kani
2016-03-08 17:41 ` Toshi Kani
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160308120253.GA3599@gmail.com \
--to=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=bp@suse.de \
--cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org \
--cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=toshi.kani@hpe.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.