From: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
Kyle McMartin <kyle@mcmartin.ca>,
rtc-linux@googlegroups.com,
Alessandro Zummo <a.zummo@towertech.it>,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-sh@vger.kernel.org,
linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org, linux-m68k@lists.linux-m68k.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] rtc: generic: follow up for COMPILE_TEST
Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2016 05:41:07 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160310044107.GD9868@piout.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1456851608-3374907-1-git-send-email-arnd@arndb.de>
Hi,
On 01/03/2016 at 17:59:56 +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote :
> Today's linux-next kernel allowed building the rtc-generic
> driver (and most other rtc drivers) on all architectures,
> but this caused some errors on architectures without asm/rtc.h.
>
> This series reworks that driver to avoid the dependency,
> and simplifies all four implementations. My first approach
> was to split the driver into four separate drivers, but
> that didn't feel right when three of them have their own
> multiplexors.
>
> The first five patches can be applied independent of one other,
> while patch 6 is optional and can be applied when all others
> are merged. Alternatively, they can all go in through the
> rtc tree. I compile-tested only the powerpc and sh targets for
> which I happened to have cross-compilers installed.
>
I like this approach. Maybe you can also remove the now unnecessary
definitions from the various asm/rtc.h.
I have a small nitpick on the parisc patch.
I'll take the first patch, no need to resend that one.
--
Alexandre Belloni, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering
http://free-electrons.com
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
Kyle McMartin <kyle@mcmartin.ca>,
rtc-linux@googlegroups.com,
Alessandro Zummo <a.zummo@towertech.it>,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-sh@vger.kernel.org,
linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org, linux-m68k@lists.linux-m68k.org
Subject: [rtc-linux] Re: [PATCH 0/6] rtc: generic: follow up for COMPILE_TEST
Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2016 05:41:07 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160310044107.GD9868@piout.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1456851608-3374907-1-git-send-email-arnd@arndb.de>
Hi,
On 01/03/2016 at 17:59:56 +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote :
> Today's linux-next kernel allowed building the rtc-generic
> driver (and most other rtc drivers) on all architectures,
> but this caused some errors on architectures without asm/rtc.h.
>
> This series reworks that driver to avoid the dependency,
> and simplifies all four implementations. My first approach
> was to split the driver into four separate drivers, but
> that didn't feel right when three of them have their own
> multiplexors.
>
> The first five patches can be applied independent of one other,
> while patch 6 is optional and can be applied when all others
> are merged. Alternatively, they can all go in through the
> rtc tree. I compile-tested only the powerpc and sh targets for
> which I happened to have cross-compilers installed.
>
I like this approach. Maybe you can also remove the now unnecessary
definitions from the various asm/rtc.h.
I have a small nitpick on the parisc patch.
I'll take the first patch, no need to resend that one.
--
Alexandre Belloni, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering
http://free-electrons.com
--
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to "rtc-linux".
Membership options at http://groups.google.com/group/rtc-linux .
Please read http://groups.google.com/group/rtc-linux/web/checklist
before submitting a driver.
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "rtc-linux" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to rtc-linux+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] rtc: generic: follow up for COMPILE_TEST
Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2016 04:41:07 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160310044107.GD9868@piout.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1456851608-3374907-1-git-send-email-arnd@arndb.de>
Hi,
On 01/03/2016 at 17:59:56 +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote :
> Today's linux-next kernel allowed building the rtc-generic
> driver (and most other rtc drivers) on all architectures,
> but this caused some errors on architectures without asm/rtc.h.
>
> This series reworks that driver to avoid the dependency,
> and simplifies all four implementations. My first approach
> was to split the driver into four separate drivers, but
> that didn't feel right when three of them have their own
> multiplexors.
>
> The first five patches can be applied independent of one other,
> while patch 6 is optional and can be applied when all others
> are merged. Alternatively, they can all go in through the
> rtc tree. I compile-tested only the powerpc and sh targets for
> which I happened to have cross-compilers installed.
>
I like this approach. Maybe you can also remove the now unnecessary
definitions from the various asm/rtc.h.
I have a small nitpick on the parisc patch.
I'll take the first patch, no need to resend that one.
--
Alexandre Belloni, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering
http://free-electrons.com
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com (Alexandre Belloni)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 0/6] rtc: generic: follow up for COMPILE_TEST
Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2016 05:41:07 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160310044107.GD9868@piout.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1456851608-3374907-1-git-send-email-arnd@arndb.de>
Hi,
On 01/03/2016 at 17:59:56 +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote :
> Today's linux-next kernel allowed building the rtc-generic
> driver (and most other rtc drivers) on all architectures,
> but this caused some errors on architectures without asm/rtc.h.
>
> This series reworks that driver to avoid the dependency,
> and simplifies all four implementations. My first approach
> was to split the driver into four separate drivers, but
> that didn't feel right when three of them have their own
> multiplexors.
>
> The first five patches can be applied independent of one other,
> while patch 6 is optional and can be applied when all others
> are merged. Alternatively, they can all go in through the
> rtc tree. I compile-tested only the powerpc and sh targets for
> which I happened to have cross-compilers installed.
>
I like this approach. Maybe you can also remove the now unnecessary
definitions from the various asm/rtc.h.
I have a small nitpick on the parisc patch.
I'll take the first patch, no need to resend that one.
--
Alexandre Belloni, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering
http://free-electrons.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-03-10 4:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 92+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-03-01 16:59 [PATCH 0/6] rtc: generic: follow up for COMPILE_TEST Arnd Bergmann
2016-03-01 16:59 ` Arnd Bergmann
2016-03-01 16:59 ` Arnd Bergmann
2016-03-01 16:59 ` [rtc-linux] " Arnd Bergmann
2016-03-01 16:59 ` [PATCH 1/6] rtc: generic: allow building on all architectures Arnd Bergmann
2016-03-01 16:59 ` Arnd Bergmann
2016-03-01 16:59 ` Arnd Bergmann
2016-03-01 16:59 ` Arnd Bergmann
2016-03-01 16:59 ` [rtc-linux] " Arnd Bergmann
2016-03-02 8:57 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2016-03-02 8:57 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2016-03-02 8:57 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2016-03-02 8:57 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2016-03-02 8:57 ` [rtc-linux] " Geert Uytterhoeven
2016-03-02 9:05 ` Arnd Bergmann
2016-03-02 9:05 ` Arnd Bergmann
2016-03-02 9:05 ` Arnd Bergmann
2016-03-02 9:05 ` Arnd Bergmann
2016-03-02 9:05 ` Arnd Bergmann
2016-03-02 9:05 ` [rtc-linux] " Arnd Bergmann
2016-03-02 9:05 ` Arnd Bergmann
2016-03-02 9:28 ` Andreas Schwab
2016-03-02 9:28 ` Andreas Schwab
2016-03-02 9:28 ` Andreas Schwab
2016-03-02 9:28 ` Andreas Schwab
2016-03-02 9:28 ` [rtc-linux] " Andreas Schwab
2016-03-02 9:28 ` Andreas Schwab
2016-03-02 9:39 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2016-03-02 9:39 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2016-03-02 9:39 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2016-03-02 9:39 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2016-03-02 9:39 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2016-03-02 9:39 ` [rtc-linux] " Geert Uytterhoeven
2016-03-02 8:57 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2016-03-01 16:59 ` [PATCH 2/6] m68k: rtc: provide rtc_class_ops directly Arnd Bergmann
2016-03-01 16:59 ` Arnd Bergmann
2016-03-01 16:59 ` Arnd Bergmann
2016-03-01 16:59 ` Arnd Bergmann
2016-03-01 16:59 ` Arnd Bergmann
2016-03-01 16:59 ` [rtc-linux] " Arnd Bergmann
2016-03-01 16:59 ` [PATCH 3/6] powerpc: " Arnd Bergmann
2016-03-01 16:59 ` Arnd Bergmann
2016-03-01 16:59 ` Arnd Bergmann
2016-03-01 16:59 ` Arnd Bergmann
2016-03-01 16:59 ` [rtc-linux] " Arnd Bergmann
2016-03-01 18:37 ` kbuild test robot
2016-03-01 18:37 ` kbuild test robot
2016-03-01 18:37 ` kbuild test robot
2016-03-01 18:37 ` kbuild test robot
2016-03-01 18:37 ` [rtc-linux] " kbuild test robot
2016-03-01 18:37 ` kbuild test robot
2016-03-01 20:31 ` Arnd Bergmann
2016-03-01 20:31 ` Arnd Bergmann
2016-03-01 20:31 ` Arnd Bergmann
2016-03-01 20:31 ` Arnd Bergmann
2016-03-01 20:31 ` Arnd Bergmann
2016-03-01 20:31 ` [rtc-linux] " Arnd Bergmann
2016-03-01 16:59 ` Arnd Bergmann
2016-03-01 17:00 ` [PATCH 4/6] parisc: " Arnd Bergmann
2016-03-01 17:00 ` Arnd Bergmann
2016-03-01 17:00 ` Arnd Bergmann
2016-03-01 17:00 ` Arnd Bergmann
2016-03-01 17:00 ` Arnd Bergmann
2016-03-01 17:00 ` [rtc-linux] " Arnd Bergmann
2016-03-01 17:19 ` kbuild test robot
2016-03-01 17:19 ` kbuild test robot
2016-03-01 17:19 ` kbuild test robot
2016-03-01 17:19 ` kbuild test robot
2016-03-01 17:19 ` [rtc-linux] " kbuild test robot
2016-03-01 17:19 ` kbuild test robot
2016-03-10 4:34 ` Alexandre Belloni
2016-03-10 4:34 ` Alexandre Belloni
2016-03-10 4:34 ` Alexandre Belloni
2016-03-10 4:34 ` Alexandre Belloni
2016-03-10 4:34 ` [rtc-linux] " Alexandre Belloni
2016-03-01 17:00 ` [PATCH 5/6] sh: " Arnd Bergmann
2016-03-01 17:00 ` Arnd Bergmann
2016-03-01 17:00 ` Arnd Bergmann
2016-03-01 17:00 ` Arnd Bergmann
2016-03-01 17:00 ` Arnd Bergmann
2016-03-01 17:00 ` [rtc-linux] " Arnd Bergmann
2016-03-01 17:00 ` [PATCH 6/6] rtc: generic: remove get_rtc_time/set_rtc_time wrappers Arnd Bergmann
2016-03-01 17:00 ` Arnd Bergmann
2016-03-01 17:00 ` Arnd Bergmann
2016-03-01 17:00 ` Arnd Bergmann
2016-03-01 17:00 ` [rtc-linux] " Arnd Bergmann
2016-03-10 4:41 ` Alexandre Belloni [this message]
2016-03-10 4:41 ` [PATCH 0/6] rtc: generic: follow up for COMPILE_TEST Alexandre Belloni
2016-03-10 4:41 ` Alexandre Belloni
2016-03-10 4:41 ` [rtc-linux] " Alexandre Belloni
2016-03-10 4:41 ` Alexandre Belloni
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2016-03-01 16:59 Arnd Bergmann
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160310044107.GD9868@piout.net \
--to=alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com \
--cc=a.zummo@towertech.it \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=kyle@mcmartin.ca \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-m68k@lists.linux-m68k.org \
--cc=linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-sh@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=rtc-linux@googlegroups.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.