All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
To: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
	Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"x86@kernel.org" <x86@kernel.org>,
	Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
	Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>,
	"Yu, Yu-cheng" <yu-cheng.yu@intel.com>
Subject: Re: Got FPU related warning on Intel Quark during boot
Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2016 10:08:40 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160311090840.GA8486@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CALCETrW5_GfXYCgocmESHf3G-2RWmhmc-+81fX0eDxFH5vu3VQ@mail.gmail.com>


* Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net> wrote:

> On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 6:59 AM, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 03:31:43PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> >> Looks like it lacks that one.
> >>
> >> # grep -i fxsr /proc/cpuinfo; echo $?
> >> 1
> >
> > Ok, so looking at where the warning comes from:
> >
> > [   14.714533] WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 823 at arch/x86/include/asm/fpu/internal.h:163 fpu__clear+0x8c/0x160
> >
> > static inline void copy_kernel_to_fxregs(struct fxregs_state *fx)
> > {
> >         int err;
> >
> >         if (config_enabled(CONFIG_X86_32)) {
> >                 err = check_insn(fxrstor %[fx], "=m" (*fx), [fx] "m" (*fx));
> >                       ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> >         } else {
> >
> >         ...
> >
> >         /* Copying from a kernel buffer to FPU registers should never fail: */
> >         WARN_ON_FPU(err);
> >
> >
> > and the stacktrace is pretty clear:
> >
> > flush_thread
> > |-> fpu__clear(&tsk->thread.fpu);
> >     |-> we are eager by default here:
> >
> >         if (!use_eager_fpu() || !static_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_FPU)) {
> >                 /* FPU state will be reallocated lazily at the first use. */
> >                 fpu__drop(fpu);
> >         } else {
> >
> >                 --> we're in that branch.
> >
> >                 copy_init_fpstate_to_fpregs();
> >                 |-> copy_kernel_to_fxregs()
> >
> >
> > I think we should use FRSTOR on quark, i.e., copy_kernel_to_fregs().
> >
> > Does this untested wild guess even work?
> >
> > ---
> > diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/fpu/core.c b/arch/x86/kernel/fpu/core.c
> > index dea8e76d60c6..bbafe5e8a1a6 100644
> > --- a/arch/x86/kernel/fpu/core.c
> > +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/fpu/core.c
> > @@ -474,8 +474,11 @@ static inline void copy_init_fpstate_to_fpregs(void)
> >  {
> >         if (use_xsave())
> >                 copy_kernel_to_xregs(&init_fpstate.xsave, -1);
> > -       else
> > +       else if (static_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_FXSR))
> >                 copy_kernel_to_fxregs(&init_fpstate.fxsave);
> > +       else
> > +               copy_kernel_to_fregs(&init_fpstate.fsave);
> > +
> >  }
> >
> 
> This looks wrong, too:
> 
> /*
>  * Once per bootup FPU initialization sequences that will run on most x86 CPUs:
>  */
> static void __init fpu__init_system_generic(void)
> {
>     /*
>      * Set up the legacy init FPU context. (xstate init might overwrite this
>      * with a more modern format, if the CPU supports it.)
>      */
>     fpstate_init_fxstate(&init_fpstate.fxsave);  <-- wrong format on pre-FXSR CPUs

Indeed:

static inline void fpstate_init_fxstate(struct fxregs_state *fx)
{
        fx->cwd = 0x37f;
        fx->mxcsr = MXCSR_DEFAULT;
}

I assumed that the fxstate init is outside the legacy FPU context area, but they 
overlap: fx->cwd is the first two bytes, and fx->mxcsr overlaps the middle of the 
legacy area.

We do a later fpstate_init_fstate(), which does:

static inline void fpstate_init_fstate(struct fregs_state *fp)
{
        fp->cwd = 0xffff037fu;
        fp->swd = 0xffff0000u;
        fp->twd = 0xffffffffu;
        fp->fos = 0xffff0000u;
}

which accidentally overwrites the cwd bit - but AFAICS fx->mxcsw overlaps the 
first legacy FPU register?

So yes, this needs to be fixed too.

Thanks,

	Ingo

  reply	other threads:[~2016-03-11  9:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-03-10 10:46 Got FPU related warning on Intel Quark during boot Andy Shevchenko
2016-03-10 11:19 ` Ingo Molnar
2016-03-10 12:48   ` Andy Shevchenko
2016-03-10 12:56     ` Borislav Petkov
2016-03-10 13:31       ` Andy Shevchenko
2016-03-10 14:59         ` Borislav Petkov
2016-03-10 15:22           ` Andy Shevchenko
2016-03-10 15:45             ` Bryan O'Donoghue
2016-03-10 16:49               ` Borislav Petkov
2016-03-10 17:15                 ` Bryan O'Donoghue
2016-03-10 19:06                   ` Borislav Petkov
2016-03-11  1:31               ` Andy Lutomirski
2016-03-11 10:50                 ` Bryan O'Donoghue
2016-03-11  1:39           ` Andy Lutomirski
2016-03-11  9:08             ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2016-03-11  9:48               ` Borislav Petkov
2016-03-11 11:02                 ` Bryan O'Donoghue
2016-03-11 11:26                   ` Borislav Petkov
2016-03-11 11:32                     ` [PATCH] x86/FPU: Fix FPU handling on legacy FPU machines Borislav Petkov
2016-03-11 18:32                       ` Linus Torvalds
2016-03-11 22:03                         ` Borislav Petkov
2016-03-11 22:07                           ` Dave Hansen
2016-03-11 22:20                             ` Borislav Petkov
2016-03-12 17:21                               ` Andy Lutomirski
2016-03-12 17:47                                 ` Borislav Petkov
2016-03-12 12:04                           ` Bryan O'Donoghue
2016-03-12 12:27                             ` Borislav Petkov
2016-03-12 15:17                           ` Ingo Molnar
2016-03-22 22:03                           ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2016-03-12 15:08                         ` Ingo Molnar
2016-03-12 15:12                           ` Ingo Molnar
2016-03-12 15:16                       ` [tip:x86/urgent] x86/fpu: Fix eager-FPU " tip-bot for Borislav Petkov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20160311090840.GA8486@gmail.com \
    --to=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=andy.shevchenko@gmail.com \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=fenghua.yu@intel.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=luto@amacapital.net \
    --cc=oleg@redhat.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    --cc=yu-cheng.yu@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.