All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
	"Bryan O'Donoghue" <pure.logic@nexus-software.ie>,
	Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>,
	Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"x86@kernel.org" <x86@kernel.org>,
	Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
	Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>,
	"Yu, Yu-cheng" <yu-cheng.yu@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/FPU: Fix FPU handling on legacy FPU machines
Date: Sat, 12 Mar 2016 16:12:10 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160312151209.GA9356@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160312150809.GA7015@gmail.com>


* Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> wrote:

> * Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> wrote:
> 
> > On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 3:32 AM, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> wrote:
> > > 486 cores like Intel Quark support only the very old, legacy x87 FPU
> > > (FSAVE/FRSTOR, CPUID bit FXSR is not set). And our FPU code wasn't
> > > handling the saving and restoring there properly. First, Andy Shevchenko
> > > reported a splat:
> > >
> > >   WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 823 at arch/x86/include/asm/fpu/internal.h:163 fpu__clear+0x8c/0x160
> > >
> > > which was us trying to execute FXRSTOR on those machines even though
> > > they don't support it.
> > >
> > > After taking care of that, Bryan O'Donoghue reported that a simple FPU
> > > test still failed because we weren't initializing the FPU state properly
> > > on those machines.
> > 
> > Obvious Ack to the patch, along with a "how did this ever work
> > before?" comment..
> 
> So the window for 'real' breakage was relatively short: this is an older bug but 
> only became a serious bug with the following upcoming commit:
> 
>   58122bf1d856 x86/fpu: Default eagerfpu=on on all CPUs

And the reason for that is:

void fpu__clear(struct fpu *fpu)
{
        WARN_ON_FPU(fpu != &current->thread.fpu); /* Almost certainly an anomaly */

        if (!use_eager_fpu() || !static_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_FPU)) {
                /* FPU state will be reallocated lazily at the first use. */
                fpu__drop(fpu);
        } else {
                if (!fpu->fpstate_active) {
                        fpu__activate_curr(fpu);
                        user_fpu_begin();
                }
                copy_init_fpstate_to_fpregs();
        }
}

i.e. we only execute the buggy sequence in the !eager_fpu case - and old FPUs were 
not eager-FPU, which hid the bug.

The other bug:

@@ -134,7 +134,7 @@ static void __init fpu__init_system_gene
         * Set up the legacy init FPU context. (xstate init might overwrite this
         * with a more modern format, if the CPU supports it.)
         */
-       fpstate_init_fxstate(&init_fpstate.fxsave);
+       fpstate_init(&init_fpstate);
 
was also hidden by the fact that it only affects eagerfpu case - but all previous 
eagerfpu bootups were for post-XSAVE CPUs.

Thanks,

	Ingo

  reply	other threads:[~2016-03-12 15:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-03-10 10:46 Got FPU related warning on Intel Quark during boot Andy Shevchenko
2016-03-10 11:19 ` Ingo Molnar
2016-03-10 12:48   ` Andy Shevchenko
2016-03-10 12:56     ` Borislav Petkov
2016-03-10 13:31       ` Andy Shevchenko
2016-03-10 14:59         ` Borislav Petkov
2016-03-10 15:22           ` Andy Shevchenko
2016-03-10 15:45             ` Bryan O'Donoghue
2016-03-10 16:49               ` Borislav Petkov
2016-03-10 17:15                 ` Bryan O'Donoghue
2016-03-10 19:06                   ` Borislav Petkov
2016-03-11  1:31               ` Andy Lutomirski
2016-03-11 10:50                 ` Bryan O'Donoghue
2016-03-11  1:39           ` Andy Lutomirski
2016-03-11  9:08             ` Ingo Molnar
2016-03-11  9:48               ` Borislav Petkov
2016-03-11 11:02                 ` Bryan O'Donoghue
2016-03-11 11:26                   ` Borislav Petkov
2016-03-11 11:32                     ` [PATCH] x86/FPU: Fix FPU handling on legacy FPU machines Borislav Petkov
2016-03-11 18:32                       ` Linus Torvalds
2016-03-11 22:03                         ` Borislav Petkov
2016-03-11 22:07                           ` Dave Hansen
2016-03-11 22:20                             ` Borislav Petkov
2016-03-12 17:21                               ` Andy Lutomirski
2016-03-12 17:47                                 ` Borislav Petkov
2016-03-12 12:04                           ` Bryan O'Donoghue
2016-03-12 12:27                             ` Borislav Petkov
2016-03-12 15:17                           ` Ingo Molnar
2016-03-22 22:03                           ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2016-03-12 15:08                         ` Ingo Molnar
2016-03-12 15:12                           ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2016-03-12 15:16                       ` [tip:x86/urgent] x86/fpu: Fix eager-FPU " tip-bot for Borislav Petkov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20160312151209.GA9356@gmail.com \
    --to=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=andy.shevchenko@gmail.com \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=fenghua.yu@intel.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=luto@amacapital.net \
    --cc=oleg@redhat.com \
    --cc=pure.logic@nexus-software.ie \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    --cc=yu-cheng.yu@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.