From: Sowmini Varadhan <sowmini.varadhan@oracle.com>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
Cc: santosh shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@oracle.com>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, davem@davemloft.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 net-next] rds-tcp: Add sysctl tunables for sndbuf/rcvbuf on rds-tcp socket
Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2016 14:16:29 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160315181629.GO11063@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1458065390.31401.45.camel@edumazet-glaptop3.roam.corp.google.com>
On (03/15/16 11:09), Eric Dumazet wrote:
>
> You said "just as user-space SO_SNDBUF allows ridiculous values
> for buffer size.."
>
> So I understood you believe SOCK_MIN_SNDBUF and/or SOCK_MIN_RCVBUF are
> ridiculous ;)
No, no! I was saying that as a clueless user-space app, I can SO_SNDBUF
to 1, and happily think that everything is fine (error == 0), when in
reality the kernel has helpfully fixed up the value for me..
> I pointed to you the actual code.
>
> sk->sk_sndbuf = max_t(u32, val * 2, SOCK_MIN_SNDBUF);
yes, I'm in the process of changing rds-tcp now (doing sanity tests
etc on it, will send out update in a short while)
>
>
> No error is returned. kernel enforces a minimal value.
>
> #define SOCK_MIN_SNDBUF (TCP_SKB_MIN_TRUESIZE * 2)
> #define TCP_SKB_MIN_TRUESIZE (2048 + SKB_DATA_ALIGN(sizeof(struct
> sk_buff)))
>
> -> 2 * (2048 + 256) = 4608 given current sk_buff overhead (that might
> change in linux 5.4 ... )
Yes, I've seen the comments somewhere (in sock_setsockopt?)
it's a bit unexpectd for someone coming from bsd/solaris because
the value returned by getsockopt is quite unpredictable (as you
point out, depends on the kernel version among other things).
> But again if your sysctl allows to set a value below SOCK_MIN_SNDBUF,
> that might be a problem, because stack could have a hidden bug for very
> small values of sndbuf/rcvbuf.
sure, fixing/testing it as I write this.
--Sowmini
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-03-15 18:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-03-15 15:12 [PATCH v2 net-next] rds-tcp: Add sysctl tunables for sndbuf/rcvbuf on rds-tcp socket Sowmini Varadhan
2016-03-15 16:38 ` santosh shilimkar
2016-03-15 16:58 ` Sowmini Varadhan
2016-03-15 17:18 ` Eric Dumazet
2016-03-15 17:30 ` Sowmini Varadhan
2016-03-15 18:09 ` Eric Dumazet
2016-03-15 18:16 ` Sowmini Varadhan [this message]
2016-03-15 17:30 ` Tom Herbert
2016-03-15 17:34 ` Sowmini Varadhan
2016-03-15 17:47 ` Tom Herbert
2016-03-15 19:57 ` Sowmini Varadhan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160315181629.GO11063@oracle.com \
--to=sowmini.varadhan@oracle.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=santosh.shilimkar@oracle.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.