All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: jszhang@marvell.com (Jisheng Zhang)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] net: mvneta: remove useless RX descriptor prefetch
Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2016 15:15:01 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160331151501.27fe34d5@xhacker> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160331144537.20f04a8c@xhacker>

Hi all,

On Thu, 31 Mar 2016 14:45:37 +0800 Jisheng Zhang wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> + linux arm kernel
> 
> On Thu, 31 Mar 2016 14:36:30 +0800 Jisheng Zhang wrote:
> 
> > The rx descriptors are allocated using dma_alloc_coherent, so prefetch
> > doesn't really happen at all.  
> 
> This is for RFC, I'm sorry to send it without changing its title -- s/PATCH/RFC.
> 
> I'm not sure whether there's any benefit to prefetch on space allocated from
> dma_alloc_coherent.

After more consideration, I think my patch is wrong.

As for coherent platforms, the space allocated from dma_alloc_coherent is
cacheable, so prefetch would definitely benefit us.

As for noncoherent platforms, the space allocated from dma_alloc_coherent is
uncacheable, but prefetch on arm/arm64 is implemented via. pld/prfm, the op
would be nop if target address is uncacheable.

So let's drop this patch.

Thanks,
Jisheng


> 
> Thanks
> 
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Jisheng Zhang <jszhang@marvell.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/mvneta.c | 1 -
> >  1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/mvneta.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/mvneta.c
> > index 5880871..6c09a27 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/mvneta.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/mvneta.c
> > @@ -757,7 +757,6 @@ mvneta_rxq_next_desc_get(struct mvneta_rx_queue *rxq)
> >  	int rx_desc = rxq->next_desc_to_proc;
> >  
> >  	rxq->next_desc_to_proc = MVNETA_QUEUE_NEXT_DESC(rxq, rx_desc);
> > -	prefetch(rxq->descs + rxq->next_desc_to_proc);
> >  	return rxq->descs + rx_desc;
> >  }
> >    
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> linux-arm-kernel mailing list
> linux-arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Jisheng Zhang <jszhang@marvell.com>
To: <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>,
	<gregory.clement@free-electrons.com>, <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: <netdev@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: mvneta: remove useless RX descriptor prefetch
Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2016 15:15:01 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160331151501.27fe34d5@xhacker> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160331144537.20f04a8c@xhacker>

Hi all,

On Thu, 31 Mar 2016 14:45:37 +0800 Jisheng Zhang wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> + linux arm kernel
> 
> On Thu, 31 Mar 2016 14:36:30 +0800 Jisheng Zhang wrote:
> 
> > The rx descriptors are allocated using dma_alloc_coherent, so prefetch
> > doesn't really happen at all.  
> 
> This is for RFC, I'm sorry to send it without changing its title -- s/PATCH/RFC.
> 
> I'm not sure whether there's any benefit to prefetch on space allocated from
> dma_alloc_coherent.

After more consideration, I think my patch is wrong.

As for coherent platforms, the space allocated from dma_alloc_coherent is
cacheable, so prefetch would definitely benefit us.

As for noncoherent platforms, the space allocated from dma_alloc_coherent is
uncacheable, but prefetch on arm/arm64 is implemented via. pld/prfm, the op
would be nop if target address is uncacheable.

So let's drop this patch.

Thanks,
Jisheng


> 
> Thanks
> 
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Jisheng Zhang <jszhang@marvell.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/mvneta.c | 1 -
> >  1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/mvneta.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/mvneta.c
> > index 5880871..6c09a27 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/mvneta.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/mvneta.c
> > @@ -757,7 +757,6 @@ mvneta_rxq_next_desc_get(struct mvneta_rx_queue *rxq)
> >  	int rx_desc = rxq->next_desc_to_proc;
> >  
> >  	rxq->next_desc_to_proc = MVNETA_QUEUE_NEXT_DESC(rxq, rx_desc);
> > -	prefetch(rxq->descs + rxq->next_desc_to_proc);
> >  	return rxq->descs + rx_desc;
> >  }
> >    
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> linux-arm-kernel mailing list
> linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  reply	other threads:[~2016-03-31  7:15 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-03-31  6:36 [PATCH] net: mvneta: remove useless RX descriptor prefetch Jisheng Zhang
2016-03-31  6:45 ` Jisheng Zhang
2016-03-31  6:45   ` Jisheng Zhang
2016-03-31  7:15   ` Jisheng Zhang [this message]
2016-03-31  7:15     ` Jisheng Zhang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20160331151501.27fe34d5@xhacker \
    --to=jszhang@marvell.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.