From: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
To: Jens Axboe <axboe@fb.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-block@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHSET v3][RFC] Make background writeback not suck
Date: Fri, 1 Apr 2016 17:27:45 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160401062745.GY11812@dastard> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <56FDEA2D.2030207@fb.com>
On Thu, Mar 31, 2016 at 09:25:33PM -0600, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On 03/31/2016 06:46 PM, Dave Chinner wrote:
> >>>virtio in guest, XFS direct IO -> no-op -> scsi in host.
> >>
> >>That has write back caching enabled on the guest, correct?
> >
> >No. It uses virtio,cache=none (that's the "XFS Direct IO" bit above).
> >Sorry for not being clear about that.
>
> That's fine, it's one less worry if that's not the case. So if you
> cat the 'write_cache' file in the virtioblk sysfs block queue/
> directory, it says 'write through'? Just want to confirm that we got
> that propagated correctly.
No such file. But I did find:
$ cat /sys/block/vdc/cache_type
write back
Which is what I'd expect it to safe given the man page description
of cache=none:
Note that this is considered a writeback mode and the guest
OS must handle the disk write cache correctly in order to
avoid data corruption on host crashes.
To make it say "write through" I need to use cache=directsync, but
I have no need for such integrity guarantees on a volatile test
device...
Cheers,
Dave.
--
Dave Chinner
david@fromorbit.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-04-01 6:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-03-30 15:07 [PATCHSET v3][RFC] Make background writeback not suck Jens Axboe
2016-03-30 15:07 ` [PATCH 1/9] writeback: propagate the various reasons for writeback Jens Axboe
2016-03-30 15:07 ` [PATCH 2/9] writeback: add wbc_to_write() Jens Axboe
2016-03-30 15:07 ` [PATCH 3/9] writeback: use WRITE_SYNC for reclaim or sync writeback Jens Axboe
2016-03-30 15:07 ` [PATCH 4/9] writeback: track if we're sleeping on progress in balance_dirty_pages() Jens Axboe
2016-04-13 13:08 ` Jan Kara
2016-04-13 14:20 ` Jens Axboe
2016-03-30 15:07 ` [PATCH 5/9] block: add ability to flag write back caching on a device Jens Axboe
2016-03-30 15:42 ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-03-30 15:46 ` Jens Axboe
2016-03-30 16:23 ` Jens Axboe
2016-03-30 17:29 ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-03-30 15:07 ` [PATCH 6/9] sd: inform block layer of write cache state Jens Axboe
2016-03-30 15:07 ` [PATCH 7/9] NVMe: " Jens Axboe
2016-03-30 15:07 ` [PATCH 8/9] block: add code to track actual device queue depth Jens Axboe
2016-03-30 15:07 ` [PATCH 9/9] writeback: throttle buffered writeback Jens Axboe
2016-03-31 8:24 ` [PATCHSET v3][RFC] Make background writeback not suck Dave Chinner
2016-03-31 14:29 ` Jens Axboe
2016-03-31 16:21 ` Jens Axboe
2016-04-01 0:56 ` Dave Chinner
2016-04-01 3:29 ` Jens Axboe
2016-04-01 3:33 ` Jens Axboe
2016-04-01 3:39 ` Jens Axboe
2016-04-01 6:16 ` Dave Chinner
2016-04-01 14:33 ` Jens Axboe
2016-04-01 5:04 ` Dave Chinner
2016-04-01 0:46 ` Dave Chinner
2016-04-01 3:25 ` Jens Axboe
2016-04-01 6:27 ` Dave Chinner [this message]
2016-04-01 14:34 ` Jens Axboe
2016-03-31 22:09 ` Holger Hoffstätte
2016-04-01 1:01 ` Dave Chinner
2016-04-01 1:01 ` Dave Chinner
2016-04-01 16:58 ` Holger Hoffstätte
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160401062745.GY11812@dastard \
--to=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=axboe@fb.com \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.