From: Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@linaro.org>
To: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com>
Cc: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 01/12] KVM: extend struct kvm_msi to hold a 32-bit device ID
Date: Sun, 3 Apr 2016 11:15:08 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160403091508.GA5261@cbox> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1458958450-19662-2-git-send-email-andre.przywara@arm.com>
On Sat, Mar 26, 2016 at 02:13:59AM +0000, Andre Przywara wrote:
> The ARM GICv3 ITS MSI controller requires a device ID to be able to
> assign the proper interrupt vector. On real hardware, this ID is
> sampled from the bus. To be able to emulate an ITS controller, extend
> the KVM MSI interface to let userspace provide such a device ID. For
> PCI devices, the device ID is simply the 16-bit bus-device-function
> triplet, which should be easily available to the userland tool.
>
> Also there is a new KVM capability which advertises whether the
> current VM requires a device ID to be set along with the MSI data.
> This flag is still reported as not available everywhere, later we will
> enable it when ITS emulation is used.
>
> Signed-off-by: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com>
> Reviewed-by: Eric Auger <eric.auger@linaro.org>
> ---
> Documentation/virtual/kvm/api.txt | 12 ++++++++++--
> include/uapi/linux/kvm.h | 5 ++++-
> 2 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/virtual/kvm/api.txt b/Documentation/virtual/kvm/api.txt
> index cb2ef0b..8f7351d 100644
> --- a/Documentation/virtual/kvm/api.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/virtual/kvm/api.txt
> @@ -2163,10 +2163,18 @@ struct kvm_msi {
> __u32 address_hi;
> __u32 data;
> __u32 flags;
> - __u8 pad[16];
> + __u32 devid;
Are we imposing any unfortunate restrictions for other architectures by
using a u32 over a u64 for the device ID?
-Christoffer
> + __u8 pad[12];
> };
>
> -No flags are defined so far. The corresponding field must be 0.
> +flags: KVM_MSI_VALID_DEVID: devid contains a valid value
> +devid: If KVM_MSI_VALID_DEVID is set, contains a unique device identifier
> + for the device that wrote the MSI message.
> + For PCI, this is usually a BFD identifier in the lower 16 bits.
> +
> +The per-VM KVM_CAP_MSI_DEVID capability advertises the need to provide
> +the device ID. If this capability is not set, userland cannot rely on
> +the kernel to allow the KVM_MSI_VALID_DEVID flag being set.
>
>
> 4.71 KVM_CREATE_PIT2
> diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/kvm.h b/include/uapi/linux/kvm.h
> index 50f44a2..6a02871 100644
> --- a/include/uapi/linux/kvm.h
> +++ b/include/uapi/linux/kvm.h
> @@ -852,6 +852,7 @@ struct kvm_ppc_smmu_info {
> #define KVM_CAP_S390_RI 124
> #define KVM_CAP_ARM_PMU_V3 125
> #define KVM_CAP_VCPU_ATTRIBUTES 126
> +#define KVM_CAP_MSI_DEVID 127
>
> #ifdef KVM_CAP_IRQ_ROUTING
>
> @@ -1010,12 +1011,14 @@ struct kvm_one_reg {
> __u64 addr;
> };
>
> +#define KVM_MSI_VALID_DEVID (1U << 0)
> struct kvm_msi {
> __u32 address_lo;
> __u32 address_hi;
> __u32 data;
> __u32 flags;
> - __u8 pad[16];
> + __u32 devid;
> + __u8 pad[12];
> };
>
> struct kvm_arm_device_addr {
> --
> 2.7.3
>
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: christoffer.dall@linaro.org (Christoffer Dall)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v4 01/12] KVM: extend struct kvm_msi to hold a 32-bit device ID
Date: Sun, 3 Apr 2016 11:15:08 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160403091508.GA5261@cbox> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1458958450-19662-2-git-send-email-andre.przywara@arm.com>
On Sat, Mar 26, 2016 at 02:13:59AM +0000, Andre Przywara wrote:
> The ARM GICv3 ITS MSI controller requires a device ID to be able to
> assign the proper interrupt vector. On real hardware, this ID is
> sampled from the bus. To be able to emulate an ITS controller, extend
> the KVM MSI interface to let userspace provide such a device ID. For
> PCI devices, the device ID is simply the 16-bit bus-device-function
> triplet, which should be easily available to the userland tool.
>
> Also there is a new KVM capability which advertises whether the
> current VM requires a device ID to be set along with the MSI data.
> This flag is still reported as not available everywhere, later we will
> enable it when ITS emulation is used.
>
> Signed-off-by: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com>
> Reviewed-by: Eric Auger <eric.auger@linaro.org>
> ---
> Documentation/virtual/kvm/api.txt | 12 ++++++++++--
> include/uapi/linux/kvm.h | 5 ++++-
> 2 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/virtual/kvm/api.txt b/Documentation/virtual/kvm/api.txt
> index cb2ef0b..8f7351d 100644
> --- a/Documentation/virtual/kvm/api.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/virtual/kvm/api.txt
> @@ -2163,10 +2163,18 @@ struct kvm_msi {
> __u32 address_hi;
> __u32 data;
> __u32 flags;
> - __u8 pad[16];
> + __u32 devid;
Are we imposing any unfortunate restrictions for other architectures by
using a u32 over a u64 for the device ID?
-Christoffer
> + __u8 pad[12];
> };
>
> -No flags are defined so far. The corresponding field must be 0.
> +flags: KVM_MSI_VALID_DEVID: devid contains a valid value
> +devid: If KVM_MSI_VALID_DEVID is set, contains a unique device identifier
> + for the device that wrote the MSI message.
> + For PCI, this is usually a BFD identifier in the lower 16 bits.
> +
> +The per-VM KVM_CAP_MSI_DEVID capability advertises the need to provide
> +the device ID. If this capability is not set, userland cannot rely on
> +the kernel to allow the KVM_MSI_VALID_DEVID flag being set.
>
>
> 4.71 KVM_CREATE_PIT2
> diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/kvm.h b/include/uapi/linux/kvm.h
> index 50f44a2..6a02871 100644
> --- a/include/uapi/linux/kvm.h
> +++ b/include/uapi/linux/kvm.h
> @@ -852,6 +852,7 @@ struct kvm_ppc_smmu_info {
> #define KVM_CAP_S390_RI 124
> #define KVM_CAP_ARM_PMU_V3 125
> #define KVM_CAP_VCPU_ATTRIBUTES 126
> +#define KVM_CAP_MSI_DEVID 127
>
> #ifdef KVM_CAP_IRQ_ROUTING
>
> @@ -1010,12 +1011,14 @@ struct kvm_one_reg {
> __u64 addr;
> };
>
> +#define KVM_MSI_VALID_DEVID (1U << 0)
> struct kvm_msi {
> __u32 address_lo;
> __u32 address_hi;
> __u32 data;
> __u32 flags;
> - __u8 pad[16];
> + __u32 devid;
> + __u8 pad[12];
> };
>
> struct kvm_arm_device_addr {
> --
> 2.7.3
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-04-03 9:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 120+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-03-26 2:13 [PATCH v4 00/12] KVM: arm64: GICv3 ITS emulation Andre Przywara
2016-03-26 2:13 ` Andre Przywara
2016-03-26 2:13 ` [PATCH v4 01/12] KVM: extend struct kvm_msi to hold a 32-bit device ID Andre Przywara
2016-03-26 2:13 ` Andre Przywara
2016-04-03 9:15 ` Christoffer Dall [this message]
2016-04-03 9:15 ` Christoffer Dall
2016-05-25 15:55 ` Andre Przywara
2016-05-25 15:55 ` Andre Przywara
2016-05-25 16:16 ` Marc Zyngier
2016-05-25 16:16 ` Marc Zyngier
2016-05-31 13:05 ` Christoffer Dall
2016-05-31 13:05 ` Christoffer Dall
2016-05-05 17:55 ` Chalamarla, Tirumalesh
2016-05-05 17:55 ` Chalamarla, Tirumalesh
2016-03-26 2:14 ` [PATCH v4 02/12] KVM: arm/arm64: extend arch CAP checks to allow per-VM capabilities Andre Przywara
2016-03-26 2:14 ` Andre Przywara
2016-04-03 10:08 ` Christoffer Dall
2016-04-03 10:08 ` Christoffer Dall
2016-04-05 12:48 ` Eric Auger
2016-04-05 12:48 ` Eric Auger
2016-05-05 18:00 ` Chalamarla, Tirumalesh
2016-05-05 18:00 ` Chalamarla, Tirumalesh
2016-03-26 2:14 ` [PATCH v4 03/12] KVM: arm64: Introduce new MMIO region for the ITS base address Andre Przywara
2016-03-26 2:14 ` Andre Przywara
2016-04-03 10:08 ` Christoffer Dall
2016-04-03 10:08 ` Christoffer Dall
2016-04-05 12:47 ` Eric Auger
2016-04-05 12:47 ` Eric Auger
2016-04-07 13:44 ` Marc Zyngier
2016-04-07 13:44 ` Marc Zyngier
2016-05-05 18:08 ` Chalamarla, Tirumalesh
2016-05-05 18:08 ` Chalamarla, Tirumalesh
2016-05-09 15:47 ` Marc Zyngier
2016-05-09 15:47 ` Marc Zyngier
2016-05-09 16:53 ` Chalamarla, Tirumalesh
2016-05-09 16:53 ` Chalamarla, Tirumalesh
2016-05-09 17:09 ` Marc Zyngier
2016-05-09 17:09 ` Marc Zyngier
2016-03-26 2:14 ` [PATCH v4 04/12] KVM: arm64: handle ITS related GICv3 redistributor registers Andre Przywara
2016-03-26 2:14 ` Andre Przywara
2016-04-03 10:08 ` Christoffer Dall
2016-04-03 10:08 ` Christoffer Dall
2016-04-05 12:55 ` Eric Auger
2016-04-05 12:55 ` Eric Auger
2016-04-05 15:17 ` Eric Auger
2016-04-05 15:17 ` Eric Auger
2016-04-07 13:54 ` Marc Zyngier
2016-04-07 13:54 ` Marc Zyngier
2016-04-07 13:58 ` Marc Zyngier
2016-04-07 13:58 ` Marc Zyngier
2016-05-05 18:06 ` Chalamarla, Tirumalesh
2016-05-05 18:06 ` Chalamarla, Tirumalesh
2016-03-26 2:14 ` [PATCH v4 05/12] KVM: arm64: introduce ITS emulation file with stub functions Andre Przywara
2016-03-26 2:14 ` Andre Przywara
2016-04-05 16:03 ` Eric Auger
2016-04-05 16:03 ` Eric Auger
2016-04-07 14:04 ` Marc Zyngier
2016-04-07 14:04 ` Marc Zyngier
2016-04-07 14:08 ` Eric Auger
2016-04-07 14:08 ` Eric Auger
2016-04-07 14:48 ` Marc Zyngier
2016-04-07 14:48 ` Marc Zyngier
2016-04-07 15:09 ` Eric Auger
2016-04-07 15:09 ` Eric Auger
2016-04-07 15:19 ` Marc Zyngier
2016-04-07 15:19 ` Marc Zyngier
2016-03-26 2:14 ` [PATCH v4 06/12] KVM: arm64: implement basic ITS register handlers Andre Przywara
2016-03-26 2:14 ` Andre Przywara
2016-04-03 10:08 ` Christoffer Dall
2016-04-03 10:08 ` Christoffer Dall
2016-04-06 9:36 ` Eric Auger
2016-04-06 9:36 ` Eric Auger
2016-05-25 13:49 ` Andre Przywara
2016-05-25 13:49 ` Andre Przywara
2016-04-07 14:35 ` Marc Zyngier
2016-04-07 14:35 ` Marc Zyngier
2016-05-25 11:37 ` Andre Przywara
2016-05-25 11:37 ` Andre Przywara
2016-05-26 9:10 ` Marc Zyngier
2016-05-26 9:10 ` Marc Zyngier
2016-06-03 15:42 ` Andre Przywara
2016-06-03 15:42 ` Andre Przywara
2016-06-03 16:54 ` Marc Zyngier
2016-06-03 16:54 ` Marc Zyngier
2016-05-05 18:51 ` Chalamarla, Tirumalesh
2016-05-05 18:51 ` Chalamarla, Tirumalesh
2016-03-26 2:14 ` [PATCH v4 07/12] KVM: arm64: add data structures to model ITS interrupt translation Andre Przywara
2016-03-26 2:14 ` Andre Przywara
2016-04-06 9:53 ` Eric Auger
2016-04-06 9:53 ` Eric Auger
2016-03-26 2:14 ` [PATCH v4 08/12] KVM: arm64: connect LPIs to the VGIC emulation Andre Przywara
2016-03-26 2:14 ` Andre Przywara
2016-04-06 12:00 ` Eric Auger
2016-04-06 12:00 ` Eric Auger
2016-05-05 18:59 ` Chalamarla, Tirumalesh
2016-05-05 18:59 ` Chalamarla, Tirumalesh
2016-03-26 2:14 ` [PATCH v4 09/12] KVM: arm64: sync LPI configuration and pending tables Andre Przywara
2016-03-26 2:14 ` Andre Przywara
2016-04-06 13:41 ` Eric Auger
2016-04-06 13:41 ` Eric Auger
2016-06-03 14:17 ` Andre Przywara
2016-06-03 14:17 ` Andre Przywara
2016-03-26 2:14 ` [PATCH v4 10/12] KVM: arm64: implement ITS command queue command handlers Andre Przywara
2016-03-26 2:14 ` Andre Przywara
2016-05-05 19:12 ` Chalamarla, Tirumalesh
2016-05-05 19:12 ` Chalamarla, Tirumalesh
2016-05-25 14:34 ` Andre Przywara
2016-05-25 14:34 ` Andre Przywara
2016-03-26 2:14 ` [PATCH v4 11/12] KVM: arm64: implement MSI injection in ITS emulation Andre Przywara
2016-03-26 2:14 ` Andre Przywara
2016-03-26 2:14 ` [PATCH v4 12/12] KVM: arm64: enable ITS emulation as a virtual MSI controller Andre Przywara
2016-03-26 2:14 ` Andre Przywara
2016-06-03 4:26 ` [PATCH v4 00/12] KVM: arm64: GICv3 ITS emulation Bharat Bhushan
2016-06-03 4:26 ` Bharat Bhushan
2016-06-03 14:32 ` Andre Przywara
2016-06-03 14:32 ` Andre Przywara
2016-06-06 5:29 ` Bharat Bhushan
2016-06-06 5:29 ` Bharat Bhushan
2016-06-07 8:02 ` Christoffer Dall
2016-06-07 8:02 ` Christoffer Dall
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160403091508.GA5261@cbox \
--to=christoffer.dall@linaro.org \
--cc=andre.przywara@arm.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=marc.zyngier@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.