From: Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>
To: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>
Cc: Jiri Kosina <jikos@kernel.org>, Jessica Yu <jeyu@redhat.com>,
Miroslav Benes <mbenes@suse.cz>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, live-patching@vger.kernel.org,
Vojtech Pavlik <vojtech@suse.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v1.9 05/14] sched: horrible way to detect whether a task has been preempted
Date: Wed, 6 Apr 2016 15:06:19 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160406130619.GA5218@pathway.suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <24db5a6ae5b63dfcd2096a12d18e1399a351348e.1458933243.git.jpoimboe@redhat.com>
On Fri 2016-03-25 14:34:52, Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
> This is a horrible way to detect whether a task has been preempted.
> Come up with something better: task flag? or is there already an
> existing mechanism?
What about using kallsyms_lookup_size_offset() to check the address.
It is more heavyweight but less hacky. The following code seems
to work for me:
bool in_preempt_schedule_irq(unsigned long addr)
{
static unsigned long size;
if (unlikely(!size)) {
int ret;
ret = kallsyms_lookup_size_offset(
(unsigned long)preempt_schedule_irq,
size, NULL);
/*
* Warn when the function is used without kallsyms or
* when it is unable to locate preempt_schedule_irq().
* Be conservative and always return true in this case.
*/
if (WARN_ON(!ret))
size = -1L;
}
return (addr - (unsigned long)preempt_schedule_irq <= size);
}
Best Regards,
Petr
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-04-06 13:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 89+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-03-25 19:34 [RFC PATCH v1.9 00/14] livepatch: hybrid consistency model Josh Poimboeuf
2016-03-25 19:34 ` [RFC PATCH v1.9 01/14] x86/asm/head: cleanup initial stack variable Josh Poimboeuf
2016-03-25 19:34 ` [RFC PATCH v1.9 02/14] x86/asm/head: use a common function for starting CPUs Josh Poimboeuf
2016-03-25 19:34 ` [RFC PATCH v1.9 03/14] x86/asm/head: standardize the bottom of the stack for idle tasks Josh Poimboeuf
2016-03-25 19:34 ` [RFC PATCH v1.9 04/14] x86: move _stext marker before head code Josh Poimboeuf
2016-03-25 19:34 ` [RFC PATCH v1.9 05/14] sched: horrible way to detect whether a task has been preempted Josh Poimboeuf
2016-04-06 13:06 ` Petr Mladek [this message]
2016-04-06 16:33 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2016-04-07 9:47 ` Petr Mladek
2016-04-07 14:34 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2016-04-08 8:07 ` Petr Mladek
2016-04-08 14:34 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2016-04-07 21:15 ` Jessica Yu
2016-04-07 21:37 ` Jiri Kosina
2016-04-07 22:35 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2016-04-07 22:53 ` Jiri Kosina
2016-04-07 23:15 ` Jessica Yu
2016-04-08 7:05 ` Jiri Kosina
2016-04-08 8:03 ` Petr Mladek
2016-04-08 14:31 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2016-04-11 8:38 ` Petr Mladek
2016-03-25 19:34 ` [RFC PATCH v1.9 06/14] x86: add error handling to dump_trace() Josh Poimboeuf
2016-03-25 19:34 ` [RFC PATCH v1.9 07/14] x86/stacktrace: add function for detecting reliable stack traces Josh Poimboeuf
2016-03-31 13:03 ` Miroslav Benes
2016-04-04 17:54 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2016-04-11 14:16 ` Jiri Slaby
2016-04-12 15:56 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2016-06-09 8:31 ` Jiri Slaby
2016-06-13 21:58 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2016-12-01 20:28 ` Jiri Slaby
2016-12-01 20:59 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2017-01-17 13:08 ` Jiri Slaby
2016-04-04 15:55 ` Petr Mladek
2016-04-04 17:58 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2016-04-07 11:55 ` Petr Mladek
2016-04-07 14:46 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2016-04-08 8:24 ` Petr Mladek
2016-04-11 3:29 ` Jessica Yu
2016-03-25 19:34 ` [RFC PATCH v1.9 08/14] livepatch: separate enabled and patched states Josh Poimboeuf
2016-04-11 3:31 ` Jessica Yu
2016-04-12 14:44 ` [RFC PATCH v1.9 08/14] " Chris J Arges
2016-04-12 17:16 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2016-04-12 17:35 ` Chris J Arges
2016-04-12 18:25 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2016-03-25 19:34 ` [RFC PATCH v1.9 09/14] livepatch: remove unnecessary object loaded check Josh Poimboeuf
2016-03-25 19:34 ` [RFC PATCH v1.9 10/14] livepatch: move patching functions into patch.c Josh Poimboeuf
2016-03-25 19:34 ` [RFC PATCH v1.9 11/14] livepatch: store function sizes Josh Poimboeuf
2016-03-25 19:34 ` [RFC PATCH v1.9 12/14] livepatch: create per-task consistency model Josh Poimboeuf
2016-03-31 13:12 ` Miroslav Benes
2016-04-04 18:21 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2016-04-04 18:27 ` Vojtech Pavlik
2016-04-04 18:33 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2016-04-05 11:36 ` Vojtech Pavlik
2016-04-05 13:53 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2016-04-05 17:32 ` Minfei Huang
2016-04-05 21:17 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2016-04-14 9:25 ` Miroslav Benes
2016-04-14 16:39 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2016-04-15 9:17 ` Miroslav Benes
2016-03-25 19:35 ` [RFC PATCH v1.9 13/14] livepatch: add /proc/<pid>/patch_status Josh Poimboeuf
2016-03-31 9:33 ` Jiri Slaby
2016-03-31 9:40 ` Jiri Slaby
2016-04-04 16:56 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2016-03-25 19:35 ` [RFC PATCH v1.9 14/14] livepatch: update task universe when exiting kernel Josh Poimboeuf
2016-04-14 8:47 ` Miroslav Benes
2016-04-14 8:50 ` Miroslav Benes
2016-04-14 13:39 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2016-04-18 15:01 ` [RFC PATCH 0/2] s390/klp: s390 support Miroslav Benes
2016-04-18 15:01 ` [RFC PATCH 1/2] s390: livepatch, reorganize TIF bits Miroslav Benes
2016-04-18 15:01 ` [RFC PATCH 2/2] s390/klp: update task universe when exiting kernel Miroslav Benes
2016-04-18 15:17 ` [RFC PATCH 0/2] s390/klp: s390 support Josh Poimboeuf
2016-04-14 13:23 ` [RFC PATCH v1.9 14/14] livepatch: update task universe when exiting kernel Josh Poimboeuf
2016-03-31 12:54 ` [RFC PATCH v1.9 00/14] livepatch: hybrid consistency model Miroslav Benes
2016-04-04 17:03 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2016-04-05 14:24 ` Miroslav Benes
2016-04-05 14:34 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2016-04-05 14:53 ` Miroslav Benes
2016-04-01 13:34 ` Miroslav Benes
2016-04-01 13:39 ` Petr Mladek
2016-04-01 15:38 ` Petr Mladek
2016-04-05 13:44 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2016-04-06 8:15 ` Petr Mladek
2016-04-28 18:53 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2016-06-09 14:20 ` Petr Mladek
2016-04-07 12:10 ` Petr Mladek
2016-04-07 15:08 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2016-04-07 15:47 ` Jiri Kosina
2016-04-07 18:03 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2016-04-07 18:33 ` Jiri Kosina
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160406130619.GA5218@pathway.suse.cz \
--to=pmladek@suse.com \
--cc=jeyu@redhat.com \
--cc=jikos@kernel.org \
--cc=jpoimboe@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=live-patching@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mbenes@suse.cz \
--cc=vojtech@suse.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.