From: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com>
To: zengzhaoxiu@163.com
Cc: kgene@kernel.org, k.kozlowski@samsung.com, richard@nod.at,
dwmw2@infradead.org, computersforpeace@gmail.com,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org, linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Zeng Zhaoxiu <zhaoxiu.zeng@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mtd: nand: s3c2410: fix bug in s3c2410_nand_correct_data()
Date: Fri, 8 Apr 2016 02:18:17 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160408021817.274d4e59@bbrezillon> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1460047697-72830-1-git-send-email-zengzhaoxiu@163.com>
Hi Zeng,
On Fri, 8 Apr 2016 00:48:17 +0800
zengzhaoxiu@163.com wrote:
> From: Zeng Zhaoxiu <zhaoxiu.zeng@gmail.com>
>
> If there is only one bit difference in the ECC, the function should return 1.
> The result of "diff0 & ~(1<<fls(diff0))" is equal to diff0, so the function
> actually returns -1.
>
> Here, we can use the simple expression "(diff0 & (diff0 - 1)) == 0" to determine
> whether the diff0 has only one 1-bit.
Missing Signed-off-by here.
> ---
> drivers/mtd/nand/s3c2410.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/s3c2410.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/s3c2410.c
> index 9c9397b..c9698cf 100644
> --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/s3c2410.c
> +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/s3c2410.c
> @@ -542,7 +542,7 @@ static int s3c2410_nand_correct_data(struct mtd_info *mtd, u_char *dat,
> diff0 |= (diff1 << 8);
> diff0 |= (diff2 << 16);
>
> - if ((diff0 & ~(1<<fls(diff0))) == 0)
> + if ((diff0 & (diff0 - 1)) == 0)
Or just
if (hweight_long((unsigned long)diff0) == 1)
which is doing exactly what the comment says.
BTW, I don't understand why the current code is wrong? To me, it seems
it's correctly detecting the case where only a single bit is different.
What are you trying to fix exactly?
Best Regards,
Boris
--
Boris Brezillon, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
http://free-electrons.com
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com (Boris Brezillon)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] mtd: nand: s3c2410: fix bug in s3c2410_nand_correct_data()
Date: Fri, 8 Apr 2016 02:18:17 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160408021817.274d4e59@bbrezillon> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1460047697-72830-1-git-send-email-zengzhaoxiu@163.com>
Hi Zeng,
On Fri, 8 Apr 2016 00:48:17 +0800
zengzhaoxiu at 163.com wrote:
> From: Zeng Zhaoxiu <zhaoxiu.zeng@gmail.com>
>
> If there is only one bit difference in the ECC, the function should return 1.
> The result of "diff0 & ~(1<<fls(diff0))" is equal to diff0, so the function
> actually returns -1.
>
> Here, we can use the simple expression "(diff0 & (diff0 - 1)) == 0" to determine
> whether the diff0 has only one 1-bit.
Missing Signed-off-by here.
> ---
> drivers/mtd/nand/s3c2410.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/s3c2410.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/s3c2410.c
> index 9c9397b..c9698cf 100644
> --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/s3c2410.c
> +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/s3c2410.c
> @@ -542,7 +542,7 @@ static int s3c2410_nand_correct_data(struct mtd_info *mtd, u_char *dat,
> diff0 |= (diff1 << 8);
> diff0 |= (diff2 << 16);
>
> - if ((diff0 & ~(1<<fls(diff0))) == 0)
> + if ((diff0 & (diff0 - 1)) == 0)
Or just
if (hweight_long((unsigned long)diff0) == 1)
which is doing exactly what the comment says.
BTW, I don't understand why the current code is wrong? To me, it seems
it's correctly detecting the case where only a single bit is different.
What are you trying to fix exactly?
Best Regards,
Boris
--
Boris Brezillon, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
http://free-electrons.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-04-08 0:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-04-07 16:48 [PATCH] mtd: nand: s3c2410: fix bug in s3c2410_nand_correct_data() zengzhaoxiu
2016-04-07 16:48 ` zengzhaoxiu at 163.com
2016-04-08 0:18 ` Boris Brezillon [this message]
2016-04-08 0:18 ` Boris Brezillon
2016-04-08 1:51 ` Zeng Zhaoxiu
2016-04-08 1:51 ` Zeng Zhaoxiu
2016-04-08 2:18 ` Boris Brezillon
2016-04-08 2:18 ` Boris Brezillon
2016-04-08 5:37 ` Zeng Zhaoxiu
2016-04-08 5:37 ` Zeng Zhaoxiu
2016-04-11 7:49 ` Boris Brezillon
2016-04-11 7:49 ` Boris Brezillon
2016-04-12 7:30 ` zengzhaoxiu
2016-04-12 7:30 ` zengzhaoxiu at 163.com
2016-04-12 11:34 ` Boris Brezillon
2016-04-12 11:34 ` Boris Brezillon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160408021817.274d4e59@bbrezillon \
--to=boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com \
--cc=computersforpeace@gmail.com \
--cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
--cc=k.kozlowski@samsung.com \
--cc=kgene@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=richard@nod.at \
--cc=zengzhaoxiu@163.com \
--cc=zhaoxiu.zeng@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.