From: Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com>
To: Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com>
Cc: linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org, Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
Jan Kara <jack@suse.com>,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dax: integrate *sync code & multi-order radix tree
Date: Fri, 15 Apr 2016 14:10:58 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160415201058.GA20412@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1460667804-21725-1-git-send-email-ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com>
On Thu, Apr 14, 2016 at 03:03:24PM -0600, Ross Zwisler wrote:
> With the new addition of the multi-order radix tree support we can simplify
> the DAX *sync PMD support a bit. Instead of manually checking to see if
> our index is covered by a PMD entry we can rely on the new radix tree to
> return the PMD entry if present.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com>
Sorry, I should have explicitly called out that this patch (indeed, all
multi-order uses of the radix tree) need to be built upon the recent
multi-order fixes from Matthew and me:
https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/4/14/481
I've posted a working tree here:
https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/zwisler/linux.git/log/?h=dax_mo_radix
Thanks,
- Ross
_______________________________________________
Linux-nvdimm mailing list
Linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org
https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-nvdimm
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com>
To: Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>, Jan Kara <jack@suse.com>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@linux.intel.com>,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dax: integrate *sync code & multi-order radix tree
Date: Fri, 15 Apr 2016 14:10:58 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160415201058.GA20412@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1460667804-21725-1-git-send-email-ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com>
On Thu, Apr 14, 2016 at 03:03:24PM -0600, Ross Zwisler wrote:
> With the new addition of the multi-order radix tree support we can simplify
> the DAX *sync PMD support a bit. Instead of manually checking to see if
> our index is covered by a PMD entry we can rely on the new radix tree to
> return the PMD entry if present.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com>
Sorry, I should have explicitly called out that this patch (indeed, all
multi-order uses of the radix tree) need to be built upon the recent
multi-order fixes from Matthew and me:
https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/4/14/481
I've posted a working tree here:
https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/zwisler/linux.git/log/?h=dax_mo_radix
Thanks,
- Ross
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com>
To: Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>, Jan Kara <jack@suse.com>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@linux.intel.com>,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-nvdimm@ml01.01.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dax: integrate *sync code & multi-order radix tree
Date: Fri, 15 Apr 2016 14:10:58 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160415201058.GA20412@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1460667804-21725-1-git-send-email-ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com>
On Thu, Apr 14, 2016 at 03:03:24PM -0600, Ross Zwisler wrote:
> With the new addition of the multi-order radix tree support we can simplify
> the DAX *sync PMD support a bit. Instead of manually checking to see if
> our index is covered by a PMD entry we can rely on the new radix tree to
> return the PMD entry if present.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com>
Sorry, I should have explicitly called out that this patch (indeed, all
multi-order uses of the radix tree) need to be built upon the recent
multi-order fixes from Matthew and me:
https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/4/14/481
I've posted a working tree here:
https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/zwisler/linux.git/log/?h=dax_mo_radix
Thanks,
- Ross
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-04-15 20:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-04-14 21:03 [PATCH] dax: integrate *sync code & multi-order radix tree Ross Zwisler
2016-04-14 21:03 ` Ross Zwisler
2016-04-14 21:03 ` Ross Zwisler
2016-04-15 20:10 ` Ross Zwisler [this message]
2016-04-15 20:10 ` Ross Zwisler
2016-04-15 20:10 ` Ross Zwisler
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160415201058.GA20412@linux.intel.com \
--to=ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=jack@suse.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.