From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@samsung.com>
To: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@osg.samsung.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Anand Moon <linux.amoon@gmail.com>,
Kukjin Kim <kgene@kernel.org>,
linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org,
Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@samsung.com>,
linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] i2c: exynos5: Fix possible ABBA deadlock by keeping I2C clock prepared
Date: Sun, 17 Apr 2016 15:34:21 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160417133421.GC3620@kozik-lap> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1460855693-28225-2-git-send-email-javier@osg.samsung.com>
On Sat, Apr 16, 2016 at 09:14:53PM -0400, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
> The exynos5 I2C controller driver always prepares and enables a clock
> before using it and then disables unprepares it when the clock is not
> used anymore.
>
> But this can cause a possible ABBA deadlock in some scenarios since a
> driver that uses regmap to access its I2C registers, will first grab
> the regmap lock and then the I2C xfer function will grab the prepare
> lock when preparing the I2C clock. But since the clock driver also
> uses regmap for I2C accesses, preparing a clock will first grab the
> prepare lock and then the regmap lock when using the regmap API.
>
> An example of this happens on the Exynos5422 Odroid XU4 board where a
> s2mps11 PMIC is used and both the s2mps11 regulators and clk drivers
> share the same I2C regmap.
>
> The possible deadlock is reported by the kernel lockdep:
>
> Possible unsafe locking scenario:
>
> CPU0 CPU1
> ---- ----
> lock(sec_core:428:(regmap)->lock);
> lock(prepare_lock);
> lock(sec_core:428:(regmap)->lock);
> lock(prepare_lock);
>
> *** DEADLOCK ***
>
> Fix it by leaving the code prepared on probe and use {en,dis}able in
> the I2C transfer function.
>
> This patch is similar to commit 34e81ad5f0b6 ("i2c: s3c2410: fix ABBA
> deadlock by keeping clock prepared") that fixes the same bug in other
> driver for an I2C controller found in Samsung SoCs.
>
> Reported-by: Anand Moon <linux.amoon@gmail.com>
> Signed-off-by: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@osg.samsung.com>
> Reviewed-by: Anand Moon <linux.amoon@gmail.com>
> Tested-by: Anand Moon <linux.amoon@gmail.com>
>
> ---
>
> Changes in v2:
> - Add Anand Moon's Reviewed and Tested by tags.
> - Unprepare the clock on suspend. Suggested by Krzysztof Kozlowski.
>
> drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-exynos5.c | 14 +++++++++++---
> 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
Hi,
Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@samsung.com>
Best regards,
Krzysztof
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: k.kozlowski@samsung.com (Krzysztof Kozlowski)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 2/2] i2c: exynos5: Fix possible ABBA deadlock by keeping I2C clock prepared
Date: Sun, 17 Apr 2016 15:34:21 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160417133421.GC3620@kozik-lap> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1460855693-28225-2-git-send-email-javier@osg.samsung.com>
On Sat, Apr 16, 2016 at 09:14:53PM -0400, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
> The exynos5 I2C controller driver always prepares and enables a clock
> before using it and then disables unprepares it when the clock is not
> used anymore.
>
> But this can cause a possible ABBA deadlock in some scenarios since a
> driver that uses regmap to access its I2C registers, will first grab
> the regmap lock and then the I2C xfer function will grab the prepare
> lock when preparing the I2C clock. But since the clock driver also
> uses regmap for I2C accesses, preparing a clock will first grab the
> prepare lock and then the regmap lock when using the regmap API.
>
> An example of this happens on the Exynos5422 Odroid XU4 board where a
> s2mps11 PMIC is used and both the s2mps11 regulators and clk drivers
> share the same I2C regmap.
>
> The possible deadlock is reported by the kernel lockdep:
>
> Possible unsafe locking scenario:
>
> CPU0 CPU1
> ---- ----
> lock(sec_core:428:(regmap)->lock);
> lock(prepare_lock);
> lock(sec_core:428:(regmap)->lock);
> lock(prepare_lock);
>
> *** DEADLOCK ***
>
> Fix it by leaving the code prepared on probe and use {en,dis}able in
> the I2C transfer function.
>
> This patch is similar to commit 34e81ad5f0b6 ("i2c: s3c2410: fix ABBA
> deadlock by keeping clock prepared") that fixes the same bug in other
> driver for an I2C controller found in Samsung SoCs.
>
> Reported-by: Anand Moon <linux.amoon@gmail.com>
> Signed-off-by: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@osg.samsung.com>
> Reviewed-by: Anand Moon <linux.amoon@gmail.com>
> Tested-by: Anand Moon <linux.amoon@gmail.com>
>
> ---
>
> Changes in v2:
> - Add Anand Moon's Reviewed and Tested by tags.
> - Unprepare the clock on suspend. Suggested by Krzysztof Kozlowski.
>
> drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-exynos5.c | 14 +++++++++++---
> 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
Hi,
Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@samsung.com>
Best regards,
Krzysztof
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-04-17 13:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-04-17 1:14 [PATCH v2 1/2] i2c: exynos5: Check clk_prepare_enable() return value Javier Martinez Canillas
2016-04-17 1:14 ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2016-04-17 1:14 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] i2c: exynos5: Fix possible ABBA deadlock by keeping I2C clock prepared Javier Martinez Canillas
2016-04-17 1:14 ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2016-04-17 13:34 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski [this message]
2016-04-17 13:34 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2016-04-22 13:31 ` Wolfram Sang
2016-04-22 13:31 ` Wolfram Sang
2016-04-17 13:32 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] i2c: exynos5: Check clk_prepare_enable() return value Krzysztof Kozlowski
2016-04-17 13:32 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160417133421.GC3620@kozik-lap \
--to=k.kozlowski@samsung.com \
--cc=javier@osg.samsung.com \
--cc=kgene@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux.amoon@gmail.com \
--cc=wsa@the-dreams.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.