From: philip.li@intel.com (Philip Li)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] clk: sunxi: add predivider handling for factors clock
Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2016 18:22:34 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160419102234.GD8836@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAEzqOZuhwDL7VfBD+ph+PdAhBu2asnxg=hOPpV0E=VqNr8ojdw@mail.gmail.com>
On Sun, Apr 17, 2016 at 11:53:47AM +0800, Vishnu Patekar wrote:
> Both of these patches in series has to be applied at the same time.
> I think this is the reason, it fails.
hi Xiaolong, would you help do a check whether we apply the patches in correct sequence for this case?
> On 17 Apr 2016 09:26, "kbuild test robot" <lkp@intel.com> wrote:
>
> > Hi Vishnu,
> >
> > [auto build test ERROR on clk/clk-next]
> > [also build test ERROR on v4.6-rc3 next-20160415]
> > [if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to
> > help improving the system]
> >
> > url:
> > https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Vishnu-Patekar/sunxi-factors-clock-predivider-handling/20160417-025801
> > base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/clk/linux.git
> > clk-next
> > config: arm-sunxi_defconfig (attached as .config)
> > reproduce:
> > wget
> > https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/wfg/lkp-tests.git/plain/sbin/make.cross
> > -O ~/bin/make.cross
> > chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross
> > # save the attached .config to linux build tree
> > make.cross ARCH=arm
> >
> > Note: the
> > linux-review/Vishnu-Patekar/sunxi-factors-clock-predivider-handling/20160417-025801
> > HEAD 19bb5fc952754381d9f4f9b2e57a1fa09f467359 builds fine.
> > It only hurts bisectibility.
> >
> > All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):
> >
> > drivers/clk/sunxi/clk-sunxi.c: In function 'sun6i_get_ahb1_factors':
> > >> drivers/clk/sunxi/clk-sunxi.c:310:9: error: 'struct factors_request'
> > has no member named 'parent_index'
> > if (req->parent_index == SUN6I_AHB1_PARENT_PLL6) {
> > ^
> > drivers/clk/sunxi/clk-sunxi.c: In function 'sun6i_ahb1_recalc':
> > drivers/clk/sunxi/clk-sunxi.c:340:9: error: 'struct factors_request'
> > has no member named 'parent_index'
> > if (req->parent_index == SUN6I_AHB1_PARENT_PLL6)
> > ^
> >
> > vim +310 drivers/clk/sunxi/clk-sunxi.c
> >
> > a78bb355 Chen-Yu Tsai 2016-01-25 304 if (req->parent_rate && req->rate
> > > req->parent_rate)
> > a78bb355 Chen-Yu Tsai 2016-01-25 305 req->rate =
> > req->parent_rate;
> > a78bb355 Chen-Yu Tsai 2016-01-25 306
> > a78bb355 Chen-Yu Tsai 2016-01-25 307 div =
> > DIV_ROUND_UP(req->parent_rate, req->rate);
> > a78bb355 Chen-Yu Tsai 2016-01-25 308
> > a78bb355 Chen-Yu Tsai 2016-01-25 309 /* calculate pre-divider if parent
> > is pll6 */
> > a78bb355 Chen-Yu Tsai 2016-01-25 @310 if (req->parent_index ==
> > SUN6I_AHB1_PARENT_PLL6) {
> > a78bb355 Chen-Yu Tsai 2016-01-25 311 if (div < 4)
> > a78bb355 Chen-Yu Tsai 2016-01-25 312 calcp = 0;
> > a78bb355 Chen-Yu Tsai 2016-01-25 313 else if (div / 2 < 4)
> >
> > :::::: The code at line 310 was first introduced by commit
> > :::::: a78bb35552a800949b2bf68f372d3d6ccabdd790 clk: sunxi: rewrite
> > sun6i-a31-ahb1-clk using factors clk with custom recalc
> >
> > :::::: TO: Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@csie.org>
> > :::::: CC: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com>
> >
> > ---
> > 0-DAY kernel test infrastructure Open Source Technology
> > Center
> > https://lists.01.org/pipermail/kbuild-all Intel
> > Corporation
> >
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Philip Li <philip.li@intel.com>
To: Vishnu Patekar <vishnupatekar0510@gmail.com>, xiaolong.ye@intel.com
Cc: kbuild test robot <lkp@intel.com>, Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@csie.org>,
sboyd@codeaurora.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com, linux-sunxi@googlegroups.com,
kbuild-all@01.org, emilio@elopez.com.ar,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] clk: sunxi: add predivider handling for factors clock
Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2016 18:22:34 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160419102234.GD8836@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAEzqOZuhwDL7VfBD+ph+PdAhBu2asnxg=hOPpV0E=VqNr8ojdw@mail.gmail.com>
On Sun, Apr 17, 2016 at 11:53:47AM +0800, Vishnu Patekar wrote:
> Both of these patches in series has to be applied at the same time.
> I think this is the reason, it fails.
hi Xiaolong, would you help do a check whether we apply the patches in correct sequence for this case?
> On 17 Apr 2016 09:26, "kbuild test robot" <lkp@intel.com> wrote:
>
> > Hi Vishnu,
> >
> > [auto build test ERROR on clk/clk-next]
> > [also build test ERROR on v4.6-rc3 next-20160415]
> > [if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to
> > help improving the system]
> >
> > url:
> > https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Vishnu-Patekar/sunxi-factors-clock-predivider-handling/20160417-025801
> > base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/clk/linux.git
> > clk-next
> > config: arm-sunxi_defconfig (attached as .config)
> > reproduce:
> > wget
> > https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/wfg/lkp-tests.git/plain/sbin/make.cross
> > -O ~/bin/make.cross
> > chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross
> > # save the attached .config to linux build tree
> > make.cross ARCH=arm
> >
> > Note: the
> > linux-review/Vishnu-Patekar/sunxi-factors-clock-predivider-handling/20160417-025801
> > HEAD 19bb5fc952754381d9f4f9b2e57a1fa09f467359 builds fine.
> > It only hurts bisectibility.
> >
> > All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):
> >
> > drivers/clk/sunxi/clk-sunxi.c: In function 'sun6i_get_ahb1_factors':
> > >> drivers/clk/sunxi/clk-sunxi.c:310:9: error: 'struct factors_request'
> > has no member named 'parent_index'
> > if (req->parent_index == SUN6I_AHB1_PARENT_PLL6) {
> > ^
> > drivers/clk/sunxi/clk-sunxi.c: In function 'sun6i_ahb1_recalc':
> > drivers/clk/sunxi/clk-sunxi.c:340:9: error: 'struct factors_request'
> > has no member named 'parent_index'
> > if (req->parent_index == SUN6I_AHB1_PARENT_PLL6)
> > ^
> >
> > vim +310 drivers/clk/sunxi/clk-sunxi.c
> >
> > a78bb355 Chen-Yu Tsai 2016-01-25 304 if (req->parent_rate && req->rate
> > > req->parent_rate)
> > a78bb355 Chen-Yu Tsai 2016-01-25 305 req->rate =
> > req->parent_rate;
> > a78bb355 Chen-Yu Tsai 2016-01-25 306
> > a78bb355 Chen-Yu Tsai 2016-01-25 307 div =
> > DIV_ROUND_UP(req->parent_rate, req->rate);
> > a78bb355 Chen-Yu Tsai 2016-01-25 308
> > a78bb355 Chen-Yu Tsai 2016-01-25 309 /* calculate pre-divider if parent
> > is pll6 */
> > a78bb355 Chen-Yu Tsai 2016-01-25 @310 if (req->parent_index ==
> > SUN6I_AHB1_PARENT_PLL6) {
> > a78bb355 Chen-Yu Tsai 2016-01-25 311 if (div < 4)
> > a78bb355 Chen-Yu Tsai 2016-01-25 312 calcp = 0;
> > a78bb355 Chen-Yu Tsai 2016-01-25 313 else if (div / 2 < 4)
> >
> > :::::: The code at line 310 was first introduced by commit
> > :::::: a78bb35552a800949b2bf68f372d3d6ccabdd790 clk: sunxi: rewrite
> > sun6i-a31-ahb1-clk using factors clk with custom recalc
> >
> > :::::: TO: Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@csie.org>
> > :::::: CC: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com>
> >
> > ---
> > 0-DAY kernel test infrastructure Open Source Technology
> > Center
> > https://lists.01.org/pipermail/kbuild-all Intel
> > Corporation
> >
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-04-19 10:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-04-16 18:55 [PATCH 0/2] sunxi factors clock predivider handling Vishnu Patekar
2016-04-16 18:55 ` Vishnu Patekar
2016-04-16 18:55 ` [PATCH 1/2] clk: sunxi: add predivider handling for factors clock Vishnu Patekar
2016-04-16 18:55 ` Vishnu Patekar
2016-04-17 1:25 ` kbuild test robot
2016-04-17 1:25 ` kbuild test robot
[not found] ` <CAEzqOZuhwDL7VfBD+ph+PdAhBu2asnxg=hOPpV0E=VqNr8ojdw@mail.gmail.com>
2016-04-19 10:22 ` Philip Li [this message]
2016-04-19 10:22 ` Philip Li
2016-04-19 14:16 ` Chen-Yu Tsai
2016-04-19 14:16 ` Chen-Yu Tsai
2016-04-19 15:42 ` Vishnu Patekar
2016-04-19 15:42 ` Vishnu Patekar
2016-04-16 18:55 ` [PATCH 2/2] clk: sunxi: add prediv table for a31 ahb1 clock Vishnu Patekar
2016-04-16 18:55 ` Vishnu Patekar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160419102234.GD8836@intel.com \
--to=philip.li@intel.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.