All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
To: Jon Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com>
Cc: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>,
	Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@gmail.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] regulator: core: Resolve supply earlier
Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2016 13:03:13 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160419110313.GA8284@ulmo.ba.sec> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5716059B.3080503@nvidia.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1988 bytes --]

On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 11:16:59AM +0100, Jon Hunter wrote:
> 
> On 11/04/16 15:16, Mark Brown wrote:
> > * PGP Signed by an unknown key
> > 
> > On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 04:11:01PM +0200, Thierry Reding wrote:
> >> On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 03:03:00PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> > 
> >>> This shouldn't be a hard dependency: most regulators won't be in bypass
> >>> mode or otherwise depend on their parents enough to need this.
> > 
> >> I had initially proposed to resolve the supply only when necessary
> >> during regulator_get_voltage() when checking for bypass, perhaps that
> >> would after all be more appropriate here?
> > 
> > Yes, that had been what I'd expected.
> 
> So the following seems to work, but only item I am uncertain about
> is if it is ok to move the mutex_lock to after the
> machine_set_constraints()?
> 
> Jon
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/regulator/core.c b/drivers/regulator/core.c
> index 61d3918f329e..742d10371e2d 100644
> --- a/drivers/regulator/core.c
> +++ b/drivers/regulator/core.c
> @@ -3126,8 +3126,13 @@ static int _regulator_get_voltage(struct regulator_dev *rdev)
>  			return ret;
>  		if (bypassed) {
>  			/* if bypassed the regulator must have a supply */
> -			if (!rdev->supply)
> -				return -EINVAL;
> +			if (!rdev->supply) {
> +				ret = regulator_resolve_supply(rdev);
> +				if (ret < 0)
> +					return ret;
> +				if (!rdev->supply)
> +					return -EINVAL;
> +			}
>  
>  			return _regulator_get_voltage(rdev->supply->rdev);
>  		}
> @@ -3939,8 +3944,6 @@ regulator_register(const struct regulator_desc *regulator_desc,
>  		rdev->dev.of_node = of_node_get(config->of_node);
>  	}
>  
> -	mutex_lock(&regulator_list_mutex);

It seems like this is used to protect accesses to the list of enable
GPIOs (regulator_ena_gpio_list), which is modified in the call to the
regulator_ena_gpio_request() function below.

That would be easily solved giving that its own lock, though.

Thierry

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 819 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2016-04-19 11:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-04-07 14:22 [PATCH 1/5] regulator: core: Resolve supply earlier Thierry Reding
2016-04-07 14:22 ` [PATCH 2/5] regulator: core: Use parent voltage from the supply when bypassed Thierry Reding
2016-04-12  6:31   ` Applied "regulator: core: Use parent voltage from the supply when bypassed" to the regulator tree Mark Brown
2016-04-07 14:22 ` [PATCH 3/5] regulator: helpers: Ensure bypass register field matches ON value Thierry Reding
2016-04-22 10:49   ` Applied "regulator: helpers: Ensure bypass register field matches ON value" to the regulator tree Mark Brown
2016-04-07 14:22 ` [PATCH 4/5] regulator: as3722: Add bypass support for LDO6 Thierry Reding
2016-04-11 16:15   ` Applied "regulator: as3722: Add bypass support for LDO6" to the regulator tree Mark Brown
2016-04-07 14:22 ` [PATCH 5/5] regulator: as3722: Constify regulator ops Thierry Reding
2016-04-11 16:15   ` Applied "regulator: as3722: Constify regulator ops" to the regulator tree Mark Brown
2016-04-11 10:59 ` [PATCH 1/5] regulator: core: Resolve supply earlier Jon Hunter
2016-04-11 11:46   ` Thierry Reding
2016-04-11 12:19     ` Jon Hunter
2016-04-11 12:49       ` Mark Brown
2016-04-11 14:03       ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2016-04-11 12:58     ` Mark Brown
2016-04-11 13:09       ` Thierry Reding
2016-04-11 13:45         ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2016-04-11 13:57           ` Mark Brown
2016-04-11 14:07             ` Thierry Reding
2016-04-11 14:32               ` Mark Brown
2016-04-11 14:49                 ` Thierry Reding
2016-04-11 15:50                   ` Mark Brown
2016-04-11 13:56         ` Mark Brown
2016-04-11 14:03 ` Mark Brown
2016-04-11 14:11   ` Thierry Reding
2016-04-11 14:16     ` Mark Brown
2016-04-19 10:16       ` Jon Hunter
2016-04-19 11:03         ` Thierry Reding [this message]
2016-04-19 15:40         ` Mark Brown
2016-04-19 16:09           ` Jon Hunter
2016-04-20 15:21             ` Mark Brown
2016-04-21 15:34               ` Jon Hunter

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20160419110313.GA8284@ulmo.ba.sec \
    --to=thierry.reding@gmail.com \
    --cc=broonie@kernel.org \
    --cc=jonathanh@nvidia.com \
    --cc=lgirdwood@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.