* [PATCH] thinkpad_acpi: support HKEY interface version 0x200 @ 2016-04-19 11:11 Bastien Nocera 2016-04-19 12:42 ` Bjørn Mork 0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread From: Bastien Nocera @ 2016-04-19 11:11 UTC (permalink / raw) To: ibm-acpi-devel, platform-driver-x86 Cc: Henrique de Moraes Holschuh, Darren Hart, Shuduo Sang, Bruce Ma From: Shuduo Sang <shuduo.sang@canonical.com> The Thinkpad X1 Carbon 2nd generation (2014) ships with BIOS that will return HKEY interface version 0x200. It needs thinkpad-acpi support otherwise it will be routed to wrong branch and the hotkey mask will be wrong. https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=114731 Signed-off-by: Bruce Ma <bruce.ma@canonical.com> Signed-off-by: Shuduo Sang <shuduo.sang@canonical.com> --- drivers/platform/x86/thinkpad_acpi.c | 35 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----- 1 file changed, 30 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/thinkpad_acpi.c b/drivers/platform/x86/thinkpad_acpi.c index dad2984..c177936 100644 --- a/drivers/platform/x86/thinkpad_acpi.c +++ b/drivers/platform/x86/thinkpad_acpi.c @@ -3357,11 +3357,8 @@ static int __init hotkey_init(struct ibm_init_struct *iibm) A30, R30, R31, T20-22, X20-21, X22-24. Detected by checking for HKEY interface version 0x100 */ if (acpi_evalf(hkey_handle, &hkeyv, "MHKV", "qd")) { - if ((hkeyv >> 8) != 1) { - pr_err("unknown version of the HKEY interface: 0x%x\n", - hkeyv); - pr_err("please report this to %s\n", TPACPI_MAIL); - } else { + switch (hkeyv >> 8) { + case 1: /* * MHKV 0x100 in A31, R40, R40e, * T4x, X31, and later @@ -3381,6 +3378,34 @@ static int __init hotkey_init(struct ibm_init_struct *iibm) } else { tp_features.hotkey_mask = 1; } + break; + + case 2: + /* + * MHKV 0x200 in X1 + */ + vdbg_printk(TPACPI_DBG_INIT | TPACPI_DBG_HKEY, + "firmware HKEY interface version: 0x%x\n", + hkeyv); + + /* Paranoia check AND init hotkey_all_mask */ + if (!acpi_evalf(hkey_handle, &hotkey_all_mask, + "MHKA", "dd", 1)) { + pr_err("missing MHKA handler, " + "please report this to %s\n", + TPACPI_MAIL); + /* Fallback: pre-init for FN+F3,F4,F12 */ + hotkey_all_mask = 0x080cU; + } else { + tp_features.hotkey_mask = 1; + } + break; + + default: + pr_err("unknown version of the HKEY interface: 0x%x\n", + hkeyv); + pr_err("please report this to %s\n", TPACPI_MAIL); + break; } } -- 2.7.3 ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] thinkpad_acpi: support HKEY interface version 0x200 2016-04-19 11:11 [PATCH] thinkpad_acpi: support HKEY interface version 0x200 Bastien Nocera @ 2016-04-19 12:42 ` Bjørn Mork [not found] ` <87k2jt7orx.fsf-lbf33ChDnrE/G1V5fR+Y7Q@public.gmane.org> 0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread From: Bjørn Mork @ 2016-04-19 12:42 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Bastien Nocera Cc: ibm-acpi-devel, platform-driver-x86, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh, Darren Hart, Shuduo Sang, Bruce Ma Bastien Nocera <hadess@hadess.net> writes: > From: Shuduo Sang <shuduo.sang@canonical.com> > > The Thinkpad X1 Carbon 2nd generation (2014) ships with BIOS that will > return HKEY interface version 0x200. It needs thinkpad-acpi support > otherwise it will be routed to wrong branch and the hotkey mask will > be wrong. > > https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=114731 > > Signed-off-by: Bruce Ma <bruce.ma@canonical.com> > Signed-off-by: Shuduo Sang <shuduo.sang@canonical.com> > --- > drivers/platform/x86/thinkpad_acpi.c | 35 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----- > 1 file changed, 30 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/thinkpad_acpi.c b/drivers/platform/x86/thinkpad_acpi.c > index dad2984..c177936 100644 > --- a/drivers/platform/x86/thinkpad_acpi.c > +++ b/drivers/platform/x86/thinkpad_acpi.c > @@ -3357,11 +3357,8 @@ static int __init hotkey_init(struct ibm_init_struct *iibm) > A30, R30, R31, T20-22, X20-21, X22-24. Detected by checking > for HKEY interface version 0x100 */ > if (acpi_evalf(hkey_handle, &hkeyv, "MHKV", "qd")) { > - if ((hkeyv >> 8) != 1) { > - pr_err("unknown version of the HKEY interface: 0x%x\n", > - hkeyv); > - pr_err("please report this to %s\n", TPACPI_MAIL); > - } else { > + switch (hkeyv >> 8) { > + case 1: > /* > * MHKV 0x100 in A31, R40, R40e, > * T4x, X31, and later > @@ -3381,6 +3378,34 @@ static int __init hotkey_init(struct ibm_init_struct *iibm) > } else { > tp_features.hotkey_mask = 1; > } > + break; > + > + case 2: > + /* > + * MHKV 0x200 in X1 > + */ > + vdbg_printk(TPACPI_DBG_INIT | TPACPI_DBG_HKEY, > + "firmware HKEY interface version: 0x%x\n", > + hkeyv); > + > + /* Paranoia check AND init hotkey_all_mask */ > + if (!acpi_evalf(hkey_handle, &hotkey_all_mask, > + "MHKA", "dd", 1)) { > + pr_err("missing MHKA handler, " > + "please report this to %s\n", > + TPACPI_MAIL); > + /* Fallback: pre-init for FN+F3,F4,F12 */ > + hotkey_all_mask = 0x080cU; > + } else { > + tp_features.hotkey_mask = 1; > + } > + break; Why do you duplicate this code block with that single byte changed? If that was intended, then it certainly should be explained. Bjørn ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
[parent not found: <87k2jt7orx.fsf-lbf33ChDnrE/G1V5fR+Y7Q@public.gmane.org>]
* Re: [PATCH] thinkpad_acpi: support HKEY interface version 0x200 [not found] ` <87k2jt7orx.fsf-lbf33ChDnrE/G1V5fR+Y7Q@public.gmane.org> @ 2016-04-19 12:48 ` Bastien Nocera [not found] ` <1461070105.7279.18.camel-0MeiytkfxGOsTnJN9+BGXg@public.gmane.org> 0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread From: Bastien Nocera @ 2016-04-19 12:48 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Bjørn Mork Cc: Henrique de Moraes Holschuh, platform-driver-x86-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA, ibm-acpi-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f, Bruce Ma, Shuduo Sang, Darren Hart On Tue, 2016-04-19 at 14:42 +0200, Bjørn Mork wrote: > Bastien Nocera <hadess@hadess.net> writes: > > > > > From: Shuduo Sang <shuduo.sang@canonical.com> > > > > The Thinkpad X1 Carbon 2nd generation (2014) ships with BIOS that > > will > > return HKEY interface version 0x200. It needs thinkpad-acpi support > > otherwise it will be routed to wrong branch and the hotkey mask > > will > > be wrong. > > > > https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=114731 > > > > Signed-off-by: Bruce Ma <bruce.ma@canonical.com> > > Signed-off-by: Shuduo Sang <shuduo.sang@canonical.com> > > --- > > drivers/platform/x86/thinkpad_acpi.c | 35 > > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----- > > 1 file changed, 30 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/thinkpad_acpi.c > > b/drivers/platform/x86/thinkpad_acpi.c > > index dad2984..c177936 100644 > > --- a/drivers/platform/x86/thinkpad_acpi.c > > +++ b/drivers/platform/x86/thinkpad_acpi.c > > @@ -3357,11 +3357,8 @@ static int __init hotkey_init(struct > > ibm_init_struct *iibm) > > A30, R30, R31, T20-22, X20-21, X22-24. Detected by > > checking > > for HKEY interface version 0x100 */ > > if (acpi_evalf(hkey_handle, &hkeyv, "MHKV", "qd")) { > > - if ((hkeyv >> 8) != 1) { > > - pr_err("unknown version of the HKEY > > interface: 0x%x\n", > > - hkeyv); > > - pr_err("please report this to %s\n", > > TPACPI_MAIL); > > - } else { > > + switch (hkeyv >> 8) { > > + case 1: > > /* > > * MHKV 0x100 in A31, R40, R40e, > > * T4x, X31, and later > > @@ -3381,6 +3378,34 @@ static int __init hotkey_init(struct > > ibm_init_struct *iibm) > > } else { > > tp_features.hotkey_mask = 1; > > } > > + break; > > + > > + case 2: > > + /* > > + * MHKV 0x200 in X1 > > + */ > > + vdbg_printk(TPACPI_DBG_INIT | > > TPACPI_DBG_HKEY, > > + "firmware HKEY interface version: > > 0x%x\n", > > + hkeyv); > > + > > + /* Paranoia check AND init hotkey_all_mask > > */ > > + if (!acpi_evalf(hkey_handle, > > &hotkey_all_mask, > > + "MHKA", "dd", 1)) { > > + pr_err("missing MHKA handler, " > > + "please report this to > > %s\n", > > + TPACPI_MAIL); > > + /* Fallback: pre-init for > > FN+F3,F4,F12 */ > > + hotkey_all_mask = 0x080cU; > > + } else { > > + tp_features.hotkey_mask = 1; > > + } > > + break; > > Why do you duplicate this code block with that single byte changed? > If > that was intended, then it certainly should be explained. I didn't, I re-sent one of Shuduo's patches. In any case, it seems that the patch breaks a few devices that appeared after the Lenovo Carbon X1 2014. This is discussed, in a few separate threads, on the ibm-acpi list: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.linux.acpi.ibm-acpi.devel Cheers ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Find and fix application performance issues faster with Applications Manager Applications Manager provides deep performance insights into multiple tiers of your business applications. It resolves application problems quickly and reduces your MTTR. Get your free trial! https://ad.doubleclick.net/ddm/clk/302982198;130105516;z _______________________________________________ ibm-acpi-devel mailing list ibm-acpi-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ibm-acpi-devel ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
[parent not found: <1461070105.7279.18.camel-0MeiytkfxGOsTnJN9+BGXg@public.gmane.org>]
* Re: [PATCH] thinkpad_acpi: support HKEY interface version 0x200 [not found] ` <1461070105.7279.18.camel-0MeiytkfxGOsTnJN9+BGXg@public.gmane.org> @ 2016-04-20 9:10 ` Yrjan Skrimstad 0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread From: Yrjan Skrimstad @ 2016-04-20 9:10 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Bastien Nocera Cc: Henrique de Moraes Holschuh, platform-driver-x86-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA, ibm-acpi-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f, Bruce Ma, Shuduo Sang, Darren Hart, Bjørn Mork On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 02:48:25PM +0200, Bastien Nocera wrote: > On Tue, 2016-04-19 at 14:42 +0200, Bjørn Mork wrote: > > Bastien Nocera <hadess@hadess.net> writes: > > > > > > > > From: Shuduo Sang <shuduo.sang@canonical.com> > > > > > > The Thinkpad X1 Carbon 2nd generation (2014) ships with BIOS that > > > will > > > return HKEY interface version 0x200. It needs thinkpad-acpi support > > > otherwise it will be routed to wrong branch and the hotkey mask > > > will > > > be wrong. > > > > > > https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=114731 > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Bruce Ma <bruce.ma@canonical.com> > > > Signed-off-by: Shuduo Sang <shuduo.sang@canonical.com> > > > --- > > > drivers/platform/x86/thinkpad_acpi.c | 35 > > > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----- > > > 1 file changed, 30 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) > > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/thinkpad_acpi.c > > > b/drivers/platform/x86/thinkpad_acpi.c > > > index dad2984..c177936 100644 > > > --- a/drivers/platform/x86/thinkpad_acpi.c > > > +++ b/drivers/platform/x86/thinkpad_acpi.c > > > @@ -3357,11 +3357,8 @@ static int __init hotkey_init(struct > > > ibm_init_struct *iibm) > > > A30, R30, R31, T20-22, X20-21, X22-24. Detected by > > > checking > > > for HKEY interface version 0x100 */ > > > if (acpi_evalf(hkey_handle, &hkeyv, "MHKV", "qd")) { > > > - if ((hkeyv >> 8) != 1) { > > > - pr_err("unknown version of the HKEY > > > interface: 0x%x\n", > > > - hkeyv); > > > - pr_err("please report this to %s\n", > > > TPACPI_MAIL); > > > - } else { > > > + switch (hkeyv >> 8) { > > > + case 1: > > > /* > > > * MHKV 0x100 in A31, R40, R40e, > > > * T4x, X31, and later > > > @@ -3381,6 +3378,34 @@ static int __init hotkey_init(struct > > > ibm_init_struct *iibm) > > > } else { > > > tp_features.hotkey_mask = 1; > > > } > > > + break; > > > + > > > + case 2: > > > + /* > > > + * MHKV 0x200 in X1 > > > + */ > > > + vdbg_printk(TPACPI_DBG_INIT | > > > TPACPI_DBG_HKEY, > > > + "firmware HKEY interface version: > > > 0x%x\n", > > > + hkeyv); > > > + > > > + /* Paranoia check AND init hotkey_all_mask > > > */ > > > + if (!acpi_evalf(hkey_handle, > > > &hotkey_all_mask, > > > + "MHKA", "dd", 1)) { > > > + pr_err("missing MHKA handler, " > > > + "please report this to > > > %s\n", > > > + TPACPI_MAIL); > > > + /* Fallback: pre-init for > > > FN+F3,F4,F12 */ > > > + hotkey_all_mask = 0x080cU; > > > + } else { > > > + tp_features.hotkey_mask = 1; > > > + } > > > + break; > > > > Why do you duplicate this code block with that single byte changed? > > If > > that was intended, then it certainly should be explained. It is not entirely duplicated. The calls to acpi_evalf are different. Would it be a good idea to move the call to vdbg_printk in both the switch cases to before the switch case to reduce the code duplication? Maybe also update the comment in case 2 to suggest that it's the MHKV for multiple newer models? > I didn't, I re-sent one of Shuduo's patches. > > In any case, it seems that the patch breaks a few devices that appeared > after the Lenovo Carbon X1 2014. This is discussed, in a few separate > threads, on the ibm-acpi list: > http://news.gmane.org/gmane.linux.acpi.ibm-acpi.devel This patch breaks devices? I failed to find any mention of that. Do you mean that it fixes some broken devices ..? ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Find and fix application performance issues faster with Applications Manager Applications Manager provides deep performance insights into multiple tiers of your business applications. It resolves application problems quickly and reduces your MTTR. Get your free trial! https://ad.doubleclick.net/ddm/clk/302982198;130105516;z _______________________________________________ ibm-acpi-devel mailing list ibm-acpi-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ibm-acpi-devel ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2016-04-20 9:10 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2016-04-19 11:11 [PATCH] thinkpad_acpi: support HKEY interface version 0x200 Bastien Nocera
2016-04-19 12:42 ` Bjørn Mork
[not found] ` <87k2jt7orx.fsf-lbf33ChDnrE/G1V5fR+Y7Q@public.gmane.org>
2016-04-19 12:48 ` Bastien Nocera
[not found] ` <1461070105.7279.18.camel-0MeiytkfxGOsTnJN9+BGXg@public.gmane.org>
2016-04-20 9:10 ` Yrjan Skrimstad
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.