All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Vineet Gupta <Vineet.Gupta1@synopsys.com>
Cc: "torvalds@linux-foundation.org" <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	"mingo@kernel.org" <mingo@kernel.org>,
	"tglx@linutronix.de" <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	"will.deacon@arm.com" <will.deacon@arm.com>,
	"paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	"boqun.feng@gmail.com" <boqun.feng@gmail.com>,
	"waiman.long@hpe.com" <waiman.long@hpe.com>,
	"fweisbec@gmail.com" <fweisbec@gmail.com>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-arch@vger.kernel.org" <linux-arch@vger.kernel.org>,
	"rth@twiddle.net" <rth@twiddle.net>,
	"linux@arm.linux.org.uk" <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>,
	"egtvedt@samfundet.no" <egtvedt@samfundet.no>,
	"realmz6@gmail.com" <realmz6@gmail.com>,
	"ysato@users.sourceforge.jp" <ysato@users.sourceforge.jp>,
	"rkuo@codeaurora.org" <rkuo@codeaurora.org>,
	"tony.luck@intel.com" <tony.luck@intel.com>,
	"geert@linux-m68k.org" <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 03/31] locking,arc: Implement atomic_fetch_{add,sub,and,andnot,or,xor}()
Date: Fri, 22 Apr 2016 16:16:14 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160422141614.GP3430@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <C2D7FE5348E1B147BCA15975FBA23075F4E9EF11@us01wembx1.internal.synopsys.com>

On Fri, Apr 22, 2016 at 10:50:41AM +0000, Vineet Gupta wrote:

> > +#define ATOMIC_FETCH_OP(op, c_op, asm_op)				\
> > +static inline int atomic_fetch_##op(int i, atomic_t *v)			\
> > +{									\
> > +	unsigned int val, result;			                \
> > +	SCOND_FAIL_RETRY_VAR_DEF                                        \
> > +									\
> > +	/*								\
> > +	 * Explicit full memory barrier needed before/after as		\
> > +	 * LLOCK/SCOND thmeselves don't provide any such semantics	\
> > +	 */								\
> > +	smp_mb();							\
> > +									\
> > +	__asm__ __volatile__(						\
> > +	"1:	llock   %[val], [%[ctr]]		\n"		\
> > +	"	mov %[result], %[val]			\n"		\
> 
> Calling it result could be a bit confusing, this is meant to be the "orig" value.
> So it indeed "result" of the API, but for atomic operation it is pristine value.
> 
> Also we can optimize away that MOV - given there are plenty of regs, so
> 
> > +	"	" #asm_op " %[val], %[val], %[i]	\n"		\
> > +	"	scond   %[val], [%[ctr]]		\n"		\
> 
> Instead have
> 
> +	"	" #asm_op " %[result], %[val], %[i]	\n"		\
> +	"	scond   %[result], [%[ctr]]		\n"		\
> 
> 

Indeed, how about something like so?

---
Subject: locking,arc: Implement atomic_fetch_{add,sub,and,andnot,or,xor}()
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Date: Mon Apr 18 01:16:09 CEST 2016

Implement FETCH-OP atomic primitives, these are very similar to the
existing OP-RETURN primitives we already have, except they return the
value of the atomic variable _before_ modification.

This is especially useful for irreversible operations -- such as
bitops (because it becomes impossible to reconstruct the state prior
to modification).

Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
---
 arch/arc/include/asm/atomic.h |   69 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
 1 file changed, 64 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

--- a/arch/arc/include/asm/atomic.h
+++ b/arch/arc/include/asm/atomic.h
@@ -102,6 +102,37 @@ static inline int atomic_##op##_return(i
 	return val;							\
 }
 
+#define ATOMIC_FETCH_OP(op, c_op, asm_op)				\
+static inline int atomic_fetch_##op(int i, atomic_t *v)			\
+{									\
+	unsigned int val, orig;						\
+	SCOND_FAIL_RETRY_VAR_DEF                                        \
+									\
+	/*								\
+	 * Explicit full memory barrier needed before/after as		\
+	 * LLOCK/SCOND thmeselves don't provide any such semantics	\
+	 */								\
+	smp_mb();							\
+									\
+	__asm__ __volatile__(						\
+	"1:	llock   %[orig], [%[ctr]]		\n"		\
+	"	" #asm_op " %[val], %[orig], %[i]	\n"		\
+	"	scond   %[val], [%[ctr]]		\n"		\
+	"						\n"		\
+	SCOND_FAIL_RETRY_ASM						\
+									\
+	: [val]	"=&r"	(val),						\
+	  [orig] "=&r" (orig)						\
+	  SCOND_FAIL_RETRY_VARS						\
+	: [ctr]	"r"	(&v->counter),					\
+	  [i]	"ir"	(i)						\
+	: "cc");							\
+									\
+	smp_mb();							\
+									\
+	return orig;							\
+}
+
 #else	/* !CONFIG_ARC_HAS_LLSC */
 
 #ifndef CONFIG_SMP
@@ -164,23 +196,49 @@ static inline int atomic_##op##_return(i
 	return temp;							\
 }
 
+#define ATOMIC_FETCH_OP(op, c_op, asm_op)				\
+static inline int atomic_fetch_##op(int i, atomic_t *v)			\
+{									\
+	unsigned long flags;						\
+	unsigned long orig;						\
+									\
+	/*								\
+	 * spin lock/unlock provides the needed smp_mb() before/after	\
+	 */								\
+	atomic_ops_lock(flags);						\
+	orig = v->counter;						\
+	v->counter c_op i;						\
+	atomic_ops_unlock(flags);					\
+									\
+	return orig;							\
+}
+
 #endif /* !CONFIG_ARC_HAS_LLSC */
 
 #define ATOMIC_OPS(op, c_op, asm_op)					\
 	ATOMIC_OP(op, c_op, asm_op)					\
-	ATOMIC_OP_RETURN(op, c_op, asm_op)
+	ATOMIC_OP_RETURN(op, c_op, asm_op)				\
+	ATOMIC_FETCH_OP(op, c_op, asm_op)
 
 ATOMIC_OPS(add, +=, add)
 ATOMIC_OPS(sub, -=, sub)
 
 #define atomic_andnot atomic_andnot
 
-ATOMIC_OP(and, &=, and)
-ATOMIC_OP(andnot, &= ~, bic)
-ATOMIC_OP(or, |=, or)
-ATOMIC_OP(xor, ^=, xor)
+#define atomic_fetch_or atomic_fetch_or
+
+#undef ATOMIC_OPS
+#define ATOMIC_OPS(op, c_op, asm_op)					\
+	ATOMIC_OP(op, c_op, asm_op)					\
+	ATOMIC_FETCH_OP(op, c_op, asm_op)
+
+ATOMIC_OPS(and, &=, and)
+ATOMIC_OPS(andnot, &= ~, bic)
+ATOMIC_OPS(or, |=, or)
+ATOMIC_OPS(xor, ^=, xor)
 
 #undef ATOMIC_OPS
+#undef ATOMIC_FETCH_OP
 #undef ATOMIC_OP_RETURN
 #undef ATOMIC_OP
 #undef SCOND_FAIL_RETRY_VAR_DEF

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Vineet Gupta <Vineet.Gupta1@synopsys.com>
Cc: "torvalds@linux-foundation.org" <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	"mingo@kernel.org" <mingo@kernel.org>,
	"tglx@linutronix.de" <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	"will.deacon@arm.com" <will.deacon@arm.com>,
	"paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	"boqun.feng@gmail.com" <boqun.feng@gmail.com>,
	"waiman.long@hpe.com" <waiman.long@hpe.com>,
	"fweisbec@gmail.com" <fweisbec@gmail.com>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-arch@vger.kernel.org" <linux-arch@vger.kernel.org>,
	"rth@twiddle.net" <rth@twiddle.net>,
	"linux@arm.linux.org.uk" <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>,
	"egtvedt@samfundet.no" <egtvedt@samfundet.no>,
	"realmz6@gmail.com" <realmz6@gmail.com>,
	"ysato@users.sourceforge.jp" <ysato@users.sourceforge.jp>,
	"rkuo@codeaurora.org" <rkuo@codeaurora.org>,
	"tony.luck@intel.com" <tony.luck@intel.com>,
	"geert@linux-m68k.org" <geert@linux-m68k.org>,
	"james.hogan@imgtec.com" <james.hogan@imgtec.com>,
	"ralf@linux-mips.org" <ralf@linux-mips.org>,
	"dhowells@redhat.com" <dhowells@redhat.com>,
	"jejb@parisc-linux.org" <jejb@parisc-linux.org>,
	"mpe@ellerman.id.au" <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
	"schwidefsky@de.ibm.com" <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>,
	"dalias@libc.org" <dalias@libc.org>,
	"davem@davemloft.net" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	"cmetcalf@mellanox.com" <cmetcalf@mellanox.com>,
	"jcmvbkbc@gmail.com" <jcmvbkbc@gmail.com>,
	"arnd@arndb.de" <arnd@arndb.de>,
	"dbueso@suse.de" <dbueso@suse.de>,
	"fengguang.wu@intel.com" <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 03/31] locking,arc: Implement atomic_fetch_{add,sub,and,andnot,or,xor}()
Date: Fri, 22 Apr 2016 16:16:14 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160422141614.GP3430@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
Message-ID: <20160422141614.nZSlLn0TdZddhVy4tYSDfOf9ZMSHJ9ALeht2hXuvGb8@z> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <C2D7FE5348E1B147BCA15975FBA23075F4E9EF11@us01wembx1.internal.synopsys.com>

On Fri, Apr 22, 2016 at 10:50:41AM +0000, Vineet Gupta wrote:

> > +#define ATOMIC_FETCH_OP(op, c_op, asm_op)				\
> > +static inline int atomic_fetch_##op(int i, atomic_t *v)			\
> > +{									\
> > +	unsigned int val, result;			                \
> > +	SCOND_FAIL_RETRY_VAR_DEF                                        \
> > +									\
> > +	/*								\
> > +	 * Explicit full memory barrier needed before/after as		\
> > +	 * LLOCK/SCOND thmeselves don't provide any such semantics	\
> > +	 */								\
> > +	smp_mb();							\
> > +									\
> > +	__asm__ __volatile__(						\
> > +	"1:	llock   %[val], [%[ctr]]		\n"		\
> > +	"	mov %[result], %[val]			\n"		\
> 
> Calling it result could be a bit confusing, this is meant to be the "orig" value.
> So it indeed "result" of the API, but for atomic operation it is pristine value.
> 
> Also we can optimize away that MOV - given there are plenty of regs, so
> 
> > +	"	" #asm_op " %[val], %[val], %[i]	\n"		\
> > +	"	scond   %[val], [%[ctr]]		\n"		\
> 
> Instead have
> 
> +	"	" #asm_op " %[result], %[val], %[i]	\n"		\
> +	"	scond   %[result], [%[ctr]]		\n"		\
> 
> 

Indeed, how about something like so?

---
Subject: locking,arc: Implement atomic_fetch_{add,sub,and,andnot,or,xor}()
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Date: Mon Apr 18 01:16:09 CEST 2016

Implement FETCH-OP atomic primitives, these are very similar to the
existing OP-RETURN primitives we already have, except they return the
value of the atomic variable _before_ modification.

This is especially useful for irreversible operations -- such as
bitops (because it becomes impossible to reconstruct the state prior
to modification).

Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
---
 arch/arc/include/asm/atomic.h |   69 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
 1 file changed, 64 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

--- a/arch/arc/include/asm/atomic.h
+++ b/arch/arc/include/asm/atomic.h
@@ -102,6 +102,37 @@ static inline int atomic_##op##_return(i
 	return val;							\
 }
 
+#define ATOMIC_FETCH_OP(op, c_op, asm_op)				\
+static inline int atomic_fetch_##op(int i, atomic_t *v)			\
+{									\
+	unsigned int val, orig;						\
+	SCOND_FAIL_RETRY_VAR_DEF                                        \
+									\
+	/*								\
+	 * Explicit full memory barrier needed before/after as		\
+	 * LLOCK/SCOND thmeselves don't provide any such semantics	\
+	 */								\
+	smp_mb();							\
+									\
+	__asm__ __volatile__(						\
+	"1:	llock   %[orig], [%[ctr]]		\n"		\
+	"	" #asm_op " %[val], %[orig], %[i]	\n"		\
+	"	scond   %[val], [%[ctr]]		\n"		\
+	"						\n"		\
+	SCOND_FAIL_RETRY_ASM						\
+									\
+	: [val]	"=&r"	(val),						\
+	  [orig] "=&r" (orig)						\
+	  SCOND_FAIL_RETRY_VARS						\
+	: [ctr]	"r"	(&v->counter),					\
+	  [i]	"ir"	(i)						\
+	: "cc");							\
+									\
+	smp_mb();							\
+									\
+	return orig;							\
+}
+
 #else	/* !CONFIG_ARC_HAS_LLSC */
 
 #ifndef CONFIG_SMP
@@ -164,23 +196,49 @@ static inline int atomic_##op##_return(i
 	return temp;							\
 }
 
+#define ATOMIC_FETCH_OP(op, c_op, asm_op)				\
+static inline int atomic_fetch_##op(int i, atomic_t *v)			\
+{									\
+	unsigned long flags;						\
+	unsigned long orig;						\
+									\
+	/*								\
+	 * spin lock/unlock provides the needed smp_mb() before/after	\
+	 */								\
+	atomic_ops_lock(flags);						\
+	orig = v->counter;						\
+	v->counter c_op i;						\
+	atomic_ops_unlock(flags);					\
+									\
+	return orig;							\
+}
+
 #endif /* !CONFIG_ARC_HAS_LLSC */
 
 #define ATOMIC_OPS(op, c_op, asm_op)					\
 	ATOMIC_OP(op, c_op, asm_op)					\
-	ATOMIC_OP_RETURN(op, c_op, asm_op)
+	ATOMIC_OP_RETURN(op, c_op, asm_op)				\
+	ATOMIC_FETCH_OP(op, c_op, asm_op)
 
 ATOMIC_OPS(add, +=, add)
 ATOMIC_OPS(sub, -=, sub)
 
 #define atomic_andnot atomic_andnot
 
-ATOMIC_OP(and, &=, and)
-ATOMIC_OP(andnot, &= ~, bic)
-ATOMIC_OP(or, |=, or)
-ATOMIC_OP(xor, ^=, xor)
+#define atomic_fetch_or atomic_fetch_or
+
+#undef ATOMIC_OPS
+#define ATOMIC_OPS(op, c_op, asm_op)					\
+	ATOMIC_OP(op, c_op, asm_op)					\
+	ATOMIC_FETCH_OP(op, c_op, asm_op)
+
+ATOMIC_OPS(and, &=, and)
+ATOMIC_OPS(andnot, &= ~, bic)
+ATOMIC_OPS(or, |=, or)
+ATOMIC_OPS(xor, ^=, xor)
 
 #undef ATOMIC_OPS
+#undef ATOMIC_FETCH_OP
 #undef ATOMIC_OP_RETURN
 #undef ATOMIC_OP
 #undef SCOND_FAIL_RETRY_VAR_DEF

  reply	other threads:[~2016-04-22 14:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 79+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-04-22  9:04 [RFC][PATCH 00/31] implement atomic_fetch_$op Peter Zijlstra
2016-04-22  9:04 ` [RFC][PATCH 01/31] locking: Flip arguments to atomic_fetch_or Peter Zijlstra
2016-04-22 10:54   ` Will Deacon
2016-04-22 11:09   ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2016-04-22 11:09     ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2016-04-22 14:18     ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-04-22 14:18       ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-04-22  9:04 ` [RFC][PATCH 02/31] locking,alpha: Implement atomic{,64}_fetch_{add,sub,and,andnot,or,xor}() Peter Zijlstra
2016-04-22 16:57   ` Richard Henderson
2016-04-23  1:55     ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-04-22  9:04 ` [RFC][PATCH 03/31] locking,arc: Implement atomic_fetch_{add,sub,and,andnot,or,xor}() Peter Zijlstra
2016-04-22 10:50   ` Vineet Gupta
2016-04-22 10:50     ` Vineet Gupta
2016-04-22 14:16     ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2016-04-22 14:16       ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-04-25  4:26       ` Vineet Gupta
2016-04-25  4:26         ` Vineet Gupta
2016-04-22 14:26     ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-04-22 14:26       ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-04-22  9:04 ` [RFC][PATCH 04/31] locking,arm: Implement atomic{,64}_fetch_{add,sub,and,andnot,or,xor}{,_relaxed,_acquire,_release}() Peter Zijlstra
2016-04-22 11:35   ` Will Deacon
2016-04-22  9:04 ` [RFC][PATCH 05/31] locking,arm64: " Peter Zijlstra
2016-04-22 11:08   ` Will Deacon
2016-04-22 14:23   ` Will Deacon
2016-04-22 14:23     ` Will Deacon
2016-04-22 14:23     ` Will Deacon
2016-04-22  9:04 ` [RFC][PATCH 06/31] locking,avr32: Implement atomic_fetch_{add,sub,and,or,xor}() Peter Zijlstra
2016-04-22 11:58   ` Hans-Christian Noren Egtvedt
2016-04-22  9:04 ` [RFC][PATCH 07/31] locking,blackfin: " Peter Zijlstra
2016-04-22  9:04 ` [RFC][PATCH 08/31] locking,frv: Implement atomic{,64}_fetch_{add,sub,and,or,xor}() Peter Zijlstra
2016-04-22  9:04 ` [RFC][PATCH 09/31] locking,h8300: Implement atomic_fetch_{add,sub,and,or,xor}() Peter Zijlstra
2016-04-22  9:04 ` [RFC][PATCH 10/31] locking,hexagon: " Peter Zijlstra
2016-04-23  2:16   ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-04-26  0:39     ` Richard Kuo
2016-04-22  9:04 ` [RFC][PATCH 11/31] locking,ia64: Implement atomic{,64}_fetch_{add,sub,and,or,xor}() Peter Zijlstra
2016-04-22  9:04 ` [RFC][PATCH 12/31] locking,m32r: Implement atomic_fetch_{add,sub,and,or,xor}() Peter Zijlstra
2016-04-22  9:04 ` [RFC][PATCH 13/31] locking,m68k: " Peter Zijlstra
2016-04-22  9:04 ` [RFC][PATCH 14/31] locking,metag: " Peter Zijlstra
2016-04-30  0:20   ` James Hogan
2016-04-30  0:20     ` James Hogan
2016-05-02  8:15     ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-04-22  9:04 ` [RFC][PATCH 15/31] locking,mips: Implement atomic{,64}_fetch_{add,sub,and,or,xor}() Peter Zijlstra
2016-04-22  9:04 ` [RFC][PATCH 16/31] locking,mn10300: Implement atomic_fetch_{add,sub,and,or,xor}() Peter Zijlstra
2016-04-22  9:04 ` [RFC][PATCH 17/31] locking,parisc: Implement atomic{,64}_fetch_{add,sub,and,or,xor}() Peter Zijlstra
2016-04-22  9:04 ` [RFC][PATCH 18/31] locking,powerpc: Implement atomic{,64}_fetch_{add,sub,and,or,xor}{,_relaxed,_acquire,_release}() Peter Zijlstra
2016-04-22 16:41   ` Boqun Feng
2016-04-23  2:31     ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-04-22  9:04 ` [RFC][PATCH 19/31] locking,s390: Implement atomic{,64}_fetch_{add,sub,and,or,xor}() Peter Zijlstra
2016-04-25  8:06   ` Martin Schwidefsky
2016-04-25  8:26     ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-04-22  9:04 ` [RFC][PATCH 20/31] locking,sh: Implement atomic_fetch_{add,sub,and,or,xor}() Peter Zijlstra
2016-04-22  9:04 ` [RFC][PATCH 21/31] locking,sparc: Implement atomic{,64}_fetch_{add,sub,and,or,xor}() Peter Zijlstra
2016-04-22  9:04 ` [RFC][PATCH 22/31] locking,tile: " Peter Zijlstra
2016-04-25 21:10   ` Chris Metcalf
2016-04-25 21:10     ` Chris Metcalf
2016-04-26 14:00     ` [PATCH] tile: clarify barrier semantics of atomic_add_return Chris Metcalf
     [not found]   ` <571E840A.8090703@mellanox.com>
2016-04-26 15:28     ` [RFC][PATCH 22/31] locking,tile: Implement atomic{,64}_fetch_{add,sub,and,or,xor}() Peter Zijlstra
2016-04-26 15:32       ` Chris Metcalf
2016-04-26 15:32         ` Chris Metcalf
2016-04-22  9:04 ` [RFC][PATCH 23/31] locking,x86: " Peter Zijlstra
2016-04-22  9:04 ` [RFC][PATCH 24/31] locking,xtensa: Implement atomic_fetch_{add,sub,and,or,xor}() Peter Zijlstra
2016-04-22  9:04 ` [RFC][PATCH 25/31] locking: Fix atomic64_relaxed bits Peter Zijlstra
2016-04-22  9:04 ` [RFC][PATCH 26/31] locking: Implement atomic{,64,_long}_fetch_{add,sub,and,andnot,or,xor}{,_relaxed,_acquire,_release}() Peter Zijlstra
2016-04-22  9:04 ` [RFC][PATCH 27/31] locking: Remove linux/atomic.h:atomic_fetch_or Peter Zijlstra
2016-04-22 13:02   ` Will Deacon
2016-04-22 14:21     ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-04-22  9:04 ` [RFC][PATCH 28/31] locking: Remove the deprecated atomic_{set,clear}_mask() functions Peter Zijlstra
2016-04-22  9:04 ` [RFC][PATCH 29/31] locking,alpha: Convert to _relaxed atomics Peter Zijlstra
2016-04-22  9:04 ` [RFC][PATCH 30/31] locking,mips: " Peter Zijlstra
2016-04-22  9:04 ` [RFC][PATCH 31/31] locking,qrwlock: Employ atomic_fetch_add_acquire() Peter Zijlstra
2016-04-22 14:25   ` Waiman Long
2016-04-22 14:25     ` Waiman Long
2016-04-22  9:44 ` [RFC][PATCH 00/31] implement atomic_fetch_$op Peter Zijlstra
2016-04-22 12:56   ` Fengguang Wu
2016-04-22 13:03     ` Will Deacon
2016-04-22 14:23     ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-04-23  1:59       ` Fengguang Wu
2016-04-22 18:35     ` Kalle Valo
2016-04-23  3:23       ` Fengguang Wu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20160422141614.GP3430@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net \
    --to=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=Vineet.Gupta1@synopsys.com \
    --cc=boqun.feng@gmail.com \
    --cc=egtvedt@samfundet.no \
    --cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
    --cc=geert@linux-m68k.org \
    --cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=realmz6@gmail.com \
    --cc=rkuo@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=rth@twiddle.net \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=waiman.long@hpe.com \
    --cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
    --cc=ysato@users.sourceforge.jp \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.