All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
To: Jeff Layton <jlayton@poochiereds.net>
Cc: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
	Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	Anna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@netapp.com>
Subject: Re: parallel lookups on NFS
Date: Sat, 30 Apr 2016 15:22:32 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160430142232.GA25498@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1462022576.10011.22.camel@poochiereds.net>

On Sat, Apr 30, 2016 at 09:22:56AM -0400, Jeff Layton wrote:
> ...but looks like same problem:
> 
> (gdb) list *(__kmalloc_track_caller+0x96)
> 0xffffffff811f9a06 is in __kmalloc_track_caller (mm/slub.c:245).
> 240      *                      Core slab cache functions
> 241      *******************************************************************/
> 242
> 243     static inline void *get_freepointer(struct kmem_cache *s, void *object)
> 244     {
> 245             return *(void **)(object + s->offset);
> 246     }
> 247
> 248     static void prefetch_freepointer(const struct kmem_cache *s, void *object)
> 249     {

Joy...  Does that happen without the last commit as well?  I realize that
memory corruption could well have been introduced earlier and changes in
the last commit had only increased the odds, but...

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
To: Jeff Layton <jlayton@poochiereds.net>
Cc: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
	Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	Anna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@netapp.com>
Subject: Re: parallel lookups on NFS
Date: Sat, 30 Apr 2016 15:22:32 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160430142232.GA25498@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1462022576.10011.22.camel@poochiereds.net>

On Sat, Apr 30, 2016 at 09:22:56AM -0400, Jeff Layton wrote:
> ...but looks like same problem:
> 
> (gdb) list *(__kmalloc_track_caller+0x96)
> 0xffffffff811f9a06 is in __kmalloc_track_caller (mm/slub.c:245).
> 240������*����������������������Core slab cache functions
> 241������*******************************************************************/
> 242
> 243�����static inline void *get_freepointer(struct kmem_cache *s, void *object)
> 244�����{
> 245�������������return *(void **)(object + s->offset);
> 246�����}
> 247
> 248�����static void prefetch_freepointer(const struct kmem_cache *s, void *object)
> 249�����{

Joy...  Does that happen without the last commit as well?  I realize that
memory corruption could well have been introduced earlier and changes in
the last commit had only increased the odds, but...

  reply	other threads:[~2016-04-30 14:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-04-24  2:34 parallel lookups on NFS Al Viro
2016-04-24 12:46 ` Jeff Layton
2016-04-24 19:18   ` Al Viro
2016-04-24 19:18     ` Al Viro
2016-04-24 20:51     ` Jeff Layton
2016-04-29  7:58     ` Al Viro
2016-04-30 13:15       ` Jeff Layton
2016-04-30 13:15         ` Jeff Layton
2016-04-30 13:22         ` Jeff Layton
2016-04-30 14:22           ` Al Viro [this message]
2016-04-30 14:22             ` Al Viro
2016-04-30 14:43             ` Jeff Layton
2016-04-30 18:58               ` Al Viro
2016-04-30 18:58                 ` Al Viro
2016-04-30 19:29                 ` Al Viro
     [not found]                   ` <1462048765.10011.44.camel@poochiereds.net>
2016-04-30 20:57                     ` Al Viro
2016-04-30 22:17                       ` Jeff Layton
2016-04-30 22:33                       ` Jeff Layton
2016-04-30 23:31                         ` Al Viro
2016-05-01  0:02                           ` Al Viro
2016-05-01  0:18                             ` Al Viro
2016-05-01  1:08                               ` Al Viro
2016-05-01 13:35                                 ` Jeff Layton
2016-04-30 23:23                       ` Jeff Layton
2016-04-30 23:29                         ` Jeff Layton

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20160430142232.GA25498@ZenIV.linux.org.uk \
    --to=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=Anna.Schumaker@netapp.com \
    --cc=jlayton@poochiereds.net \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=trond.myklebust@primarydata.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.