All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Matt Fleming <matt-mF/unelCI9GS6iBeEJttW/XRex20P6io@public.gmane.org>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd-r2nGTMty4D4@public.gmane.org>
Cc: "Compostella,
	Jeremy"
	<jeremy.compostella-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>,
	linux-efi-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
	linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] efibc: avoid stack overflow warning
Date: Sat, 30 Apr 2016 23:46:41 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160430224641.GQ2839@codeblueprint.co.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <18565207.dPI1UNgYiO@wuerfel>

On Sun, 01 May, at 12:34:29AM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> 
> The sys_restart() system call takes a mutex before calling kernel_restart()
> or kernel_poweroff().
> 
> I've had a closer look now and found that there are a few other
> callers of kernel_restart, so I guess if you restart using sysctl
> at the exact same time as calling /sbin/reboot, things may break.
 
Right. Or if the dm-verify-target driver saw an error.

> It's not something we'd have to worry about in practice, but it does
> make my patch incorrect. Should we come up with a different way to
> do it?

Jeremy proposed a patch to dynamically allocate the memory, which I
think is the correct way to go given that our (reasonable) assumptions
about reboot notifier concurrency are not guaranteed,

  https://lkml.kernel.org/r/87h9eked24.fsf-e2kLcBBGnpIIbNWpFUBdLQzuBQEzu/OPQQ4Iyu8u01E@public.gmane.org

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Matt Fleming <matt@codeblueprint.co.uk>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: "Compostella, Jeremy" <jeremy.compostella@intel.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
	linux-efi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] efibc: avoid stack overflow warning
Date: Sat, 30 Apr 2016 23:46:41 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160430224641.GQ2839@codeblueprint.co.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <18565207.dPI1UNgYiO@wuerfel>

On Sun, 01 May, at 12:34:29AM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> 
> The sys_restart() system call takes a mutex before calling kernel_restart()
> or kernel_poweroff().
> 
> I've had a closer look now and found that there are a few other
> callers of kernel_restart, so I guess if you restart using sysctl
> at the exact same time as calling /sbin/reboot, things may break.
 
Right. Or if the dm-verify-target driver saw an error.

> It's not something we'd have to worry about in practice, but it does
> make my patch incorrect. Should we come up with a different way to
> do it?

Jeremy proposed a patch to dynamically allocate the memory, which I
think is the correct way to go given that our (reasonable) assumptions
about reboot notifier concurrency are not guaranteed,

  https://lkml.kernel.org/r/87h9eked24.fsf@jcompost-MOBL1.tl.intel.com

  reply	other threads:[~2016-04-30 22:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-04-29 17:48 [PATCH] efibc: avoid stack overflow warning Arnd Bergmann
2016-04-30 20:14 ` Matt Fleming
     [not found]   ` <20160430201449.GL2839-mF/unelCI9GS6iBeEJttW/XRex20P6io@public.gmane.org>
2016-04-30 22:34     ` Arnd Bergmann
2016-04-30 22:34       ` Arnd Bergmann
2016-04-30 22:46       ` Matt Fleming [this message]
2016-04-30 22:46         ` Matt Fleming
     [not found]         ` <20160430224641.GQ2839-mF/unelCI9GS6iBeEJttW/XRex20P6io@public.gmane.org>
2016-04-30 23:25           ` Arnd Bergmann
2016-04-30 23:25             ` Arnd Bergmann
2016-05-01 13:13             ` Matt Fleming
2016-05-01 13:13               ` Matt Fleming

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20160430224641.GQ2839@codeblueprint.co.uk \
    --to=matt-mf/unelci9gs6ibeejttw/xrex20p6io@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=arnd-r2nGTMty4D4@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=jeremy.compostella-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=linux-efi-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=mingo-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.