All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
To: Ganesh Mahendran <opensource.ganesh@gmail.com>
Cc: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@gmail.com>,
	Nitin Gupta <ngupta@vflare.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Linux-MM <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm/zsmalloc: avoid unnecessary iteration in get_pages_per_zspage()
Date: Fri, 6 May 2016 13:37:02 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160506043702.GB18573@bbox> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CADAEsF9S4GQE6V+zsvRRVYjdbfN3VRQFcTiN5E_MWw60bfk0Zw@mail.gmail.com>

Hi Ganesh,

On Fri, May 06, 2016 at 12:25:18PM +0800, Ganesh Mahendran wrote:
> Hi, Minchan:
> 
> 2016-05-06 11:09 GMT+08:00 Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>:
> > On Thu, May 05, 2016 at 07:03:29PM +0900, Sergey Senozhatsky wrote:
> >> On (05/05/16 13:17), Ganesh Mahendran wrote:
> >> > if we find a zspage with usage == 100%, there is no need to
> >> > try other zspages.
> >>
> >> Hello,
> >>
> >> well... we iterate there from 0 to 1<<2, which is not awfully
> >> a lot to break it in the middle, and we do this only when we
> >> initialize a new pool (for every size class).
> >>
> >> the check is
> >>  - true   15 times
> >>  - false  492 times
> >
> > Thanks for the data, Sergey!
> >
> >>
> >> so it _sort of_ feels like this new if-condition doesn't
> >> buy us a lot, and most of the time it just sits there with
> >> no particular gain. let's hear from Minchan.
> >>
> >
> > I agree with Sergey.
> > First of al, I appreciates your patch, Ganesh! But as Sergey pointed
> > out, I don't see why it improves current zsmalloc.
> 
> This patch does not obviously improve zsmalloc.
> It just reduces unnecessary code path.
> 
> From data provided by Sergey, 15 * (4 -  1) = 45 times loop will be avoided.
> So 45 times of below caculation will be reduced:
> ---
> zspage_size = i * PAGE_SIZE;
> waste = zspage_size % class_size;
> usedpc = (zspage_size - waste) * 100 / zspage_size;
> 
> if (usedpc > max_usedpc) {

As well, it bloats code side without much gain. I don't think
it's worth to do until someone really has trouble with slow
zs_create_pool performance.

add/remove: 0/0 grow/shrink: 1/0 up/down: 15/0 (15)
function                                     old     new   delta
zs_create_pool                               960     975     +15


> ---
> 
> Thanks.
> 
> > If you want to merge strongly, please convince me with more detail
> > reason.
> >
> > Thanks.
> >
> >
> >>       -ss
> >>
> >> > Signed-off-by: Ganesh Mahendran <opensource.ganesh@gmail.com>
> >> > Cc: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
> >> > Cc: Nitin Gupta <ngupta@vflare.org>
> >> > Cc: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@gmail.com>
> >> > ---
> >> >  mm/zsmalloc.c |    3 +++
> >> >  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
> >> >
> >> > diff --git a/mm/zsmalloc.c b/mm/zsmalloc.c
> >> > index fda7177..310c7b0 100644
> >> > --- a/mm/zsmalloc.c
> >> > +++ b/mm/zsmalloc.c
> >> > @@ -765,6 +765,9 @@ static int get_pages_per_zspage(int class_size)
> >> >             if (usedpc > max_usedpc) {
> >> >                     max_usedpc = usedpc;
> >> >                     max_usedpc_order = i;
> >> > +
> >> > +                   if (max_usedpc == 100)
> >> > +                           break;
> >> >             }
> >> >     }
> >> >
> >> > --
> >> > 1.7.9.5
> >> >

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
To: Ganesh Mahendran <opensource.ganesh@gmail.com>
Cc: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@gmail.com>,
	Nitin Gupta <ngupta@vflare.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Linux-MM <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm/zsmalloc: avoid unnecessary iteration in get_pages_per_zspage()
Date: Fri, 6 May 2016 13:37:02 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160506043702.GB18573@bbox> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CADAEsF9S4GQE6V+zsvRRVYjdbfN3VRQFcTiN5E_MWw60bfk0Zw@mail.gmail.com>

Hi Ganesh,

On Fri, May 06, 2016 at 12:25:18PM +0800, Ganesh Mahendran wrote:
> Hi, Minchan:
> 
> 2016-05-06 11:09 GMT+08:00 Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>:
> > On Thu, May 05, 2016 at 07:03:29PM +0900, Sergey Senozhatsky wrote:
> >> On (05/05/16 13:17), Ganesh Mahendran wrote:
> >> > if we find a zspage with usage == 100%, there is no need to
> >> > try other zspages.
> >>
> >> Hello,
> >>
> >> well... we iterate there from 0 to 1<<2, which is not awfully
> >> a lot to break it in the middle, and we do this only when we
> >> initialize a new pool (for every size class).
> >>
> >> the check is
> >>  - true   15 times
> >>  - false  492 times
> >
> > Thanks for the data, Sergey!
> >
> >>
> >> so it _sort of_ feels like this new if-condition doesn't
> >> buy us a lot, and most of the time it just sits there with
> >> no particular gain. let's hear from Minchan.
> >>
> >
> > I agree with Sergey.
> > First of al, I appreciates your patch, Ganesh! But as Sergey pointed
> > out, I don't see why it improves current zsmalloc.
> 
> This patch does not obviously improve zsmalloc.
> It just reduces unnecessary code path.
> 
> From data provided by Sergey, 15 * (4 -  1) = 45 times loop will be avoided.
> So 45 times of below caculation will be reduced:
> ---
> zspage_size = i * PAGE_SIZE;
> waste = zspage_size % class_size;
> usedpc = (zspage_size - waste) * 100 / zspage_size;
> 
> if (usedpc > max_usedpc) {

As well, it bloats code side without much gain. I don't think
it's worth to do until someone really has trouble with slow
zs_create_pool performance.

add/remove: 0/0 grow/shrink: 1/0 up/down: 15/0 (15)
function                                     old     new   delta
zs_create_pool                               960     975     +15


> ---
> 
> Thanks.
> 
> > If you want to merge strongly, please convince me with more detail
> > reason.
> >
> > Thanks.
> >
> >
> >>       -ss
> >>
> >> > Signed-off-by: Ganesh Mahendran <opensource.ganesh@gmail.com>
> >> > Cc: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
> >> > Cc: Nitin Gupta <ngupta@vflare.org>
> >> > Cc: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@gmail.com>
> >> > ---
> >> >  mm/zsmalloc.c |    3 +++
> >> >  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
> >> >
> >> > diff --git a/mm/zsmalloc.c b/mm/zsmalloc.c
> >> > index fda7177..310c7b0 100644
> >> > --- a/mm/zsmalloc.c
> >> > +++ b/mm/zsmalloc.c
> >> > @@ -765,6 +765,9 @@ static int get_pages_per_zspage(int class_size)
> >> >             if (usedpc > max_usedpc) {
> >> >                     max_usedpc = usedpc;
> >> >                     max_usedpc_order = i;
> >> > +
> >> > +                   if (max_usedpc == 100)
> >> > +                           break;
> >> >             }
> >> >     }
> >> >
> >> > --
> >> > 1.7.9.5
> >> >

  reply	other threads:[~2016-05-06  4:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-05-05  5:17 [PATCH] mm/zsmalloc: avoid unnecessary iteration in get_pages_per_zspage() Ganesh Mahendran
2016-05-05 10:03 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2016-05-05 10:03   ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2016-05-06  3:09   ` Minchan Kim
2016-05-06  3:09     ` Minchan Kim
2016-05-06  4:25     ` Ganesh Mahendran
2016-05-06  4:25       ` Ganesh Mahendran
2016-05-06  4:37       ` Minchan Kim [this message]
2016-05-06  4:37         ` Minchan Kim
2016-05-06  9:08       ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2016-05-06  9:08         ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2016-05-06  9:33         ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2016-05-06  9:33           ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2016-05-09  5:01           ` Minchan Kim
2016-05-09  5:01             ` Minchan Kim
2016-05-11  9:34             ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2016-05-11  9:34               ` Sergey Senozhatsky

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20160506043702.GB18573@bbox \
    --to=minchan@kernel.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=ngupta@vflare.org \
    --cc=opensource.ganesh@gmail.com \
    --cc=sergey.senozhatsky.work@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.