From: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
To: Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>
Cc: "Linus Walleij" <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
"Ville Syrjälä" <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>,
"Alexandre Courbot" <gnurou@gmail.com>,
"Samuel Ortiz" <sameo@linux.intel.com>,
"Shobhit Kumar" <shobhit.kumar@intel.com>,
intel-gfx <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>,
stable <stable@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org" <linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org>,
"Thierry Reding" <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] mfd: intel_soc_pmic_core: Terminate panel control GPIO lookup table correctly
Date: Mon, 9 May 2016 08:17:29 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160509071729.GA1444@dell> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160509065703.GL27098@phenom.ffwll.local>
On Mon, 09 May 2016, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Wed, May 04, 2016 at 08:32:17AM +0100, Lee Jones wrote:
> > On Mon, 02 May 2016, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> >
> > > On Fri, Apr 29, 2016 at 11:31:44AM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote:
> > > > On Fri, Apr 22, 2016 at 9:38 PM, <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
> > > > >
> > > > > GPIO lookup tables are supposed to be zero terminated. Let's do that
> > > > > and avoid accidentally walking off the end.
> > > > >
> > > > > Cc: Shobhit Kumar <shobhit.kumar@intel.com>
> > > > > Cc: Samuel Ortiz <sameo@linux.intel.com>
> > > > > Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
> > > > > Cc: Alexandre Courbot <gnurou@gmail.com>
> > > > > Cc: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
> > > > > Cc: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
> > > > > Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> > > > > Fixes: 61dd2ca2d44e ("mfd: intel_soc_pmic_core: Add lookup table for Panel Control as GPIO signal")
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
> > > >
> > > > Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
> > >
> > > Applied to drm-intel trees, thanks for patch, reviews&acks.
> >
> > Do what now? How can you apply a patch for a subsystem you don't have
> > responsibility for? This is bound to cause merge conflicts.
>
> Oh crap, I thought Linus' ack was for the mfd stuff and didn't bother
> double-checking with MAINTAINTERS. Should I throw it out again and you'll
> pick it up, or ok as such?
Yes please.
--
Lee Jones
Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead
Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-gpio" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
To: Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>
Cc: "Linus Walleij" <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
"Ville Syrjälä" <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>,
"Alexandre Courbot" <gnurou@gmail.com>,
"Samuel Ortiz" <sameo@linux.intel.com>,
"Shobhit Kumar" <shobhit.kumar@intel.com>,
intel-gfx <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>,
stable <stable@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org" <linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org>,
"Thierry Reding" <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] mfd: intel_soc_pmic_core: Terminate panel control GPIO lookup table correctly
Date: Mon, 9 May 2016 08:17:29 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160509071729.GA1444@dell> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160509065703.GL27098@phenom.ffwll.local>
On Mon, 09 May 2016, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Wed, May 04, 2016 at 08:32:17AM +0100, Lee Jones wrote:
> > On Mon, 02 May 2016, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> >
> > > On Fri, Apr 29, 2016 at 11:31:44AM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote:
> > > > On Fri, Apr 22, 2016 at 9:38 PM, <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
> > > > >
> > > > > GPIO lookup tables are supposed to be zero terminated. Let's do that
> > > > > and avoid accidentally walking off the end.
> > > > >
> > > > > Cc: Shobhit Kumar <shobhit.kumar@intel.com>
> > > > > Cc: Samuel Ortiz <sameo@linux.intel.com>
> > > > > Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
> > > > > Cc: Alexandre Courbot <gnurou@gmail.com>
> > > > > Cc: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
> > > > > Cc: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
> > > > > Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> > > > > Fixes: 61dd2ca2d44e ("mfd: intel_soc_pmic_core: Add lookup table for Panel Control as GPIO signal")
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
> > > >
> > > > Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
> > >
> > > Applied to drm-intel trees, thanks for patch, reviews&acks.
> >
> > Do what now? How can you apply a patch for a subsystem you don't have
> > responsibility for? This is bound to cause merge conflicts.
>
> Oh crap, I thought Linus' ack was for the mfd stuff and didn't bother
> double-checking with MAINTAINTERS. Should I throw it out again and you'll
> pick it up, or ok as such?
Yes please.
--
Lee Jones
Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead
Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-05-09 7:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-04-22 19:38 [PATCH] mfd: intel_soc_pmic_core: Terminate panel control GPIO lookup table correctly ville.syrjala
2016-04-22 19:38 ` ville.syrjala
2016-04-24 10:53 ` ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for " Patchwork
2016-05-02 8:18 ` Daniel Vetter
2016-04-25 7:40 ` [PATCH] " Jani Nikula
2016-04-25 7:40 ` [Intel-gfx] " Jani Nikula
2016-04-25 10:06 ` Thierry Reding
2016-04-29 9:31 ` Linus Walleij
2016-04-29 9:31 ` Linus Walleij
2016-05-02 8:19 ` Daniel Vetter
2016-05-02 8:19 ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Vetter
2016-05-04 7:32 ` Lee Jones
2016-05-04 7:32 ` [Intel-gfx] " Lee Jones
2016-05-09 6:57 ` Daniel Vetter
2016-05-09 6:57 ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Vetter
2016-05-09 7:17 ` Lee Jones [this message]
2016-05-09 7:17 ` Lee Jones
2016-05-09 7:18 ` Lee Jones
2016-05-09 7:18 ` Lee Jones
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160509071729.GA1444@dell \
--to=lee.jones@linaro.org \
--cc=daniel@ffwll.ch \
--cc=gnurou@gmail.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sameo@linux.intel.com \
--cc=shobhit.kumar@intel.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=thierry.reding@gmail.com \
--cc=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.