All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: mark.rutland@arm.com (Mark Rutland)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] arm64: secondary_start_kernel: Remove unnecessary barrier
Date: Tue, 10 May 2016 11:34:01 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160510103400.GG687@leverpostej> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1462875281-5063-1-git-send-email-suzuki.poulose@arm.com>

On Tue, May 10, 2016 at 11:14:41AM +0100, Suzuki K Poulose wrote:
> Remove the unnecessary smp_wmb(), which was added to make sure
> that the update_cpu_boot_status() completes before we mark the
> CPU online. But update_cpu_boot_status() already has dsb() (required
> for the failing CPUs) to ensure the correct behavior.
> 
> Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
> Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
> Cc: Dennis Chen <dennis.chen@arm.com>
> Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>

Acked-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>

Mark.

> ---
>  arch/arm64/kernel/smp.c |    2 --
>  1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/smp.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/smp.c
> index b2d5f4e..ec040a8 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/smp.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/smp.c
> @@ -225,8 +225,6 @@ asmlinkage void secondary_start_kernel(void)
>  	pr_info("CPU%u: Booted secondary processor [%08x]\n",
>  					 cpu, read_cpuid_id());
>  	update_cpu_boot_status(CPU_BOOT_SUCCESS);
> -	/* Make sure the status update is visible before we complete */
> -	smp_wmb();
>  	set_cpu_online(cpu, true);
>  	complete(&cpu_running);
>  
> -- 
> 1.7.9.5
> 

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
To: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>,
	Dennis Chen <dennis.chen@arm.com>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: secondary_start_kernel: Remove unnecessary barrier
Date: Tue, 10 May 2016 11:34:01 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160510103400.GG687@leverpostej> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1462875281-5063-1-git-send-email-suzuki.poulose@arm.com>

On Tue, May 10, 2016 at 11:14:41AM +0100, Suzuki K Poulose wrote:
> Remove the unnecessary smp_wmb(), which was added to make sure
> that the update_cpu_boot_status() completes before we mark the
> CPU online. But update_cpu_boot_status() already has dsb() (required
> for the failing CPUs) to ensure the correct behavior.
> 
> Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
> Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
> Cc: Dennis Chen <dennis.chen@arm.com>
> Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>

Acked-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>

Mark.

> ---
>  arch/arm64/kernel/smp.c |    2 --
>  1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/smp.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/smp.c
> index b2d5f4e..ec040a8 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/smp.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/smp.c
> @@ -225,8 +225,6 @@ asmlinkage void secondary_start_kernel(void)
>  	pr_info("CPU%u: Booted secondary processor [%08x]\n",
>  					 cpu, read_cpuid_id());
>  	update_cpu_boot_status(CPU_BOOT_SUCCESS);
> -	/* Make sure the status update is visible before we complete */
> -	smp_wmb();
>  	set_cpu_online(cpu, true);
>  	complete(&cpu_running);
>  
> -- 
> 1.7.9.5
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2016-05-10 10:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-05-10 10:14 [PATCH] arm64: secondary_start_kernel: Remove unnecessary barrier Suzuki K Poulose
2016-05-10 10:14 ` Suzuki K Poulose
2016-05-10 10:34 ` Mark Rutland [this message]
2016-05-10 10:34   ` Mark Rutland

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20160510103400.GG687@leverpostej \
    --to=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.