Re: [REVERT] blktap2: Use RING_COPY_REQUEST

[Wei Liu <wei.liu2@citrix.com>]

On Wed, May 11, 2016 at 04:00:39AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >>> On 02.05.16 at 12:16, <wei.liu2@citrix.com> wrote:
> > On Fri, Apr 22, 2016 at 02:44:25AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >> Short of getting any feedback on the previous discussion item
> >> http://lists.xenproject.org/archives/html/xen-devel/2016-03/msg00571.html 
> >> here's a formal revert request: Please revert commit 19f6c522a6
> >> from the staging tree (afaict it didn't get mirrored to any of the
> >> stable trees yet), as the changes it does are not necessary and
> >> possibly misleading.
> > 
> > FWIW your analysis in the other thread makes sense to me. There doesn't
> > seem to be interaction between untrusted frontend and backend.
> 
> Since there was no further follow-up: Can the above be taken as
> an ack (and a release ack for one)?
> 

Doesn't this need an ack from member(s) of the security team before it
can be committed? It is related to an XSA after all.

I don't have clear idea how to proceed in this case TBH. In any case:

Acked-by: Wei Liu <wei.liu2@citrix.com>

And subject to an ack from security team member:

Release-acked-by: Wei Liu <wei.liu2@citrix.com>

Wei.

> Jan
> 

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel