* [REVERT] blktap2: Use RING_COPY_REQUEST
@ 2016-04-22 8:44 Jan Beulich
2016-05-02 8:37 ` Ping: " Jan Beulich
2016-05-02 10:16 ` Wei Liu
0 siblings, 2 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Jan Beulich @ 2016-04-22 8:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: xen-devel; +Cc: Ian Jackson, Wei Liu
Short of getting any feedback on the previous discussion item
http://lists.xenproject.org/archives/html/xen-devel/2016-03/msg00571.html
here's a formal revert request: Please revert commit 19f6c522a6
from the staging tree (afaict it didn't get mirrored to any of the
stable trees yet), as the changes it does are not necessary and
possibly misleading.
Thanks, Jan
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Ping: [REVERT] blktap2: Use RING_COPY_REQUEST
2016-04-22 8:44 [REVERT] blktap2: Use RING_COPY_REQUEST Jan Beulich
@ 2016-05-02 8:37 ` Jan Beulich
2016-05-02 10:16 ` Wei Liu
1 sibling, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Jan Beulich @ 2016-05-02 8:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Wei Liu, Ian Jackson; +Cc: xen-devel
>>> On 22.04.16 at 10:44, <JBeulich@suse.com> wrote:
> Short of getting any feedback on the previous discussion item
> http://lists.xenproject.org/archives/html/xen-devel/2016-03/msg00571.html
> here's a formal revert request: Please revert commit 19f6c522a6
> from the staging tree (afaict it didn't get mirrored to any of the
> stable trees yet), as the changes it does are not necessary and
> possibly misleading.
>
> Thanks, Jan
Ping?
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [REVERT] blktap2: Use RING_COPY_REQUEST
2016-04-22 8:44 [REVERT] blktap2: Use RING_COPY_REQUEST Jan Beulich
2016-05-02 8:37 ` Ping: " Jan Beulich
@ 2016-05-02 10:16 ` Wei Liu
2016-05-11 10:00 ` Jan Beulich
1 sibling, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Wei Liu @ 2016-05-02 10:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jan Beulich; +Cc: xen-devel, Wei Liu, Ian Jackson
On Fri, Apr 22, 2016 at 02:44:25AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote:
> Short of getting any feedback on the previous discussion item
> http://lists.xenproject.org/archives/html/xen-devel/2016-03/msg00571.html
> here's a formal revert request: Please revert commit 19f6c522a6
> from the staging tree (afaict it didn't get mirrored to any of the
> stable trees yet), as the changes it does are not necessary and
> possibly misleading.
>
FWIW your analysis in the other thread makes sense to me. There doesn't
seem to be interaction between untrusted frontend and backend.
Wei.
> Thanks, Jan
>
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [REVERT] blktap2: Use RING_COPY_REQUEST
2016-05-02 10:16 ` Wei Liu
@ 2016-05-11 10:00 ` Jan Beulich
2016-05-11 13:44 ` Wei Liu
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Jan Beulich @ 2016-05-11 10:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Wei Liu; +Cc: xen-devel, Ian Jackson
>>> On 02.05.16 at 12:16, <wei.liu2@citrix.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 22, 2016 at 02:44:25AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> Short of getting any feedback on the previous discussion item
>> http://lists.xenproject.org/archives/html/xen-devel/2016-03/msg00571.html
>> here's a formal revert request: Please revert commit 19f6c522a6
>> from the staging tree (afaict it didn't get mirrored to any of the
>> stable trees yet), as the changes it does are not necessary and
>> possibly misleading.
>
> FWIW your analysis in the other thread makes sense to me. There doesn't
> seem to be interaction between untrusted frontend and backend.
Since there was no further follow-up: Can the above be taken as
an ack (and a release ack for one)?
Jan
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [REVERT] blktap2: Use RING_COPY_REQUEST
2016-05-11 10:00 ` Jan Beulich
@ 2016-05-11 13:44 ` Wei Liu
2016-05-11 14:00 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Wei Liu @ 2016-05-11 13:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jan Beulich; +Cc: Ian Jackson, Wei Liu, xen-devel
On Wed, May 11, 2016 at 04:00:39AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >>> On 02.05.16 at 12:16, <wei.liu2@citrix.com> wrote:
> > On Fri, Apr 22, 2016 at 02:44:25AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >> Short of getting any feedback on the previous discussion item
> >> http://lists.xenproject.org/archives/html/xen-devel/2016-03/msg00571.html
> >> here's a formal revert request: Please revert commit 19f6c522a6
> >> from the staging tree (afaict it didn't get mirrored to any of the
> >> stable trees yet), as the changes it does are not necessary and
> >> possibly misleading.
> >
> > FWIW your analysis in the other thread makes sense to me. There doesn't
> > seem to be interaction between untrusted frontend and backend.
>
> Since there was no further follow-up: Can the above be taken as
> an ack (and a release ack for one)?
>
Doesn't this need an ack from member(s) of the security team before it
can be committed? It is related to an XSA after all.
I don't have clear idea how to proceed in this case TBH. In any case:
Acked-by: Wei Liu <wei.liu2@citrix.com>
And subject to an ack from security team member:
Release-acked-by: Wei Liu <wei.liu2@citrix.com>
Wei.
> Jan
>
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [REVERT] blktap2: Use RING_COPY_REQUEST
2016-05-11 13:44 ` Wei Liu
@ 2016-05-11 14:00 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk @ 2016-05-11 14:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Wei Liu; +Cc: xen-devel, Ian Jackson, Jan Beulich
On Wed, May 11, 2016 at 02:44:19PM +0100, Wei Liu wrote:
> On Wed, May 11, 2016 at 04:00:39AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote:
> > >>> On 02.05.16 at 12:16, <wei.liu2@citrix.com> wrote:
> > > On Fri, Apr 22, 2016 at 02:44:25AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote:
> > >> Short of getting any feedback on the previous discussion item
> > >> http://lists.xenproject.org/archives/html/xen-devel/2016-03/msg00571.html
> > >> here's a formal revert request: Please revert commit 19f6c522a6
> > >> from the staging tree (afaict it didn't get mirrored to any of the
> > >> stable trees yet), as the changes it does are not necessary and
> > >> possibly misleading.
> > >
> > > FWIW your analysis in the other thread makes sense to me. There doesn't
> > > seem to be interaction between untrusted frontend and backend.
> >
> > Since there was no further follow-up: Can the above be taken as
> > an ack (and a release ack for one)?
> >
>
> Doesn't this need an ack from member(s) of the security team before it
> can be committed? It is related to an XSA after all.
>
> I don't have clear idea how to proceed in this case TBH. In any case:
>
> Acked-by: Wei Liu <wei.liu2@citrix.com>
>
> And subject to an ack from security team member:
>
> Release-acked-by: Wei Liu <wei.liu2@citrix.com>
Acked-by: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>
>
> Wei.
>
> > Jan
> >
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2016-05-11 14:00 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2016-04-22 8:44 [REVERT] blktap2: Use RING_COPY_REQUEST Jan Beulich
2016-05-02 8:37 ` Ping: " Jan Beulich
2016-05-02 10:16 ` Wei Liu
2016-05-11 10:00 ` Jan Beulich
2016-05-11 13:44 ` Wei Liu
2016-05-11 14:00 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.