From: AKASHI Takahiro <takahiro.akashi@linaro.org>
To: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Geoff Levand <geoff@infradead.org>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
kexec@lists.infradead.org, Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>,
James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>, Dave Young <dyoung@redhat.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v15 00/20] arm64 kexec kernel patches v15
Date: Tue, 17 May 2016 18:07:53 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160517090602.GA31879@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <573AD11E.1030301@arm.com>
Marc, Dave
On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 09:06:54AM +0100, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> Hi Dave,
>
> On 17/05/16 06:42, Dave Young wrote:
> > Marc, it has been discussed for long time, I think kdump code can be
> > logically splitted from this series so that we can get the kexec
> > done first?
>
> The basis for kexec are already on their way to mainline, as part of the
> hibernate series that James has put together.
>
> I'd expect someone to:
>
> 1) rebase the remaining kexec/kdump patches based on the current
> arm64/for-next/core,
Done. At the time of last week.
The only issue that I have now is a support for KASLR, but this is not
a kernel issue, but tool's. I'm now talking with Dave Anderson (RedHat)
about how we should fix it.
> 2) post these patches when -rc1 gets cut in two weeks from now,
Yes, we are planning to do so.
> 3) address the review comments in a timely manner,
I'd like to expect the code to be reviewed in a timely manner, too.
In v4.6, we have not got any comments (nor ack's) on kexec/kdump-specific
part of patches. If this happens again, it will make the turnaround of our
re-spinning even longer.
> 4) update the series once a week so that we see some actual progress
Yes if we have updates.
> If this happens, I can't see any reason why this code wouldn't get
> merged. But keeping kexec and kdump together is not what has prevented
> the code from getting merged until now.
Yeah, agree.
Thanks,
-Takahiro AKASHI
>
> Thanks,
>
> M.
> >
> > On 04/01/16 at 11:39am, Geoff Levand wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> On Fri, 2016-04-01 at 09:59 +0800, Dave Young wrote:
> >>> Geoff, for easier to review maybe you can send kexec patches first
> >>> then AKASHI Takahiro
> >>> can send the kdump patches as a standalone patchset?
> >>
> >> Marc Zyngier specifically asked for an integrated set
> >> of patches for easier review. I will keep it that way
> >> for now.
> >>
> >> -Geoff
> >
>
>
> --
> Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...
_______________________________________________
kexec mailing list
kexec@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: takahiro.akashi@linaro.org (AKASHI Takahiro)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v15 00/20] arm64 kexec kernel patches v15
Date: Tue, 17 May 2016 18:07:53 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160517090602.GA31879@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <573AD11E.1030301@arm.com>
Marc, Dave
On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 09:06:54AM +0100, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> Hi Dave,
>
> On 17/05/16 06:42, Dave Young wrote:
> > Marc, it has been discussed for long time, I think kdump code can be
> > logically splitted from this series so that we can get the kexec
> > done first?
>
> The basis for kexec are already on their way to mainline, as part of the
> hibernate series that James has put together.
>
> I'd expect someone to:
>
> 1) rebase the remaining kexec/kdump patches based on the current
> arm64/for-next/core,
Done. At the time of last week.
The only issue that I have now is a support for KASLR, but this is not
a kernel issue, but tool's. I'm now talking with Dave Anderson (RedHat)
about how we should fix it.
> 2) post these patches when -rc1 gets cut in two weeks from now,
Yes, we are planning to do so.
> 3) address the review comments in a timely manner,
I'd like to expect the code to be reviewed in a timely manner, too.
In v4.6, we have not got any comments (nor ack's) on kexec/kdump-specific
part of patches. If this happens again, it will make the turnaround of our
re-spinning even longer.
> 4) update the series once a week so that we see some actual progress
Yes if we have updates.
> If this happens, I can't see any reason why this code wouldn't get
> merged. But keeping kexec and kdump together is not what has prevented
> the code from getting merged until now.
Yeah, agree.
Thanks,
-Takahiro AKASHI
>
> Thanks,
>
> M.
> >
> > On 04/01/16 at 11:39am, Geoff Levand wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> On Fri, 2016-04-01 at 09:59 +0800, Dave Young wrote:
> >>> Geoff, for easier to review maybe you can send kexec patches first
> >>> then AKASHI Takahiro
> >>> can send the kdump patches as a standalone patchset?
> >>
> >> Marc Zyngier specifically asked for an integrated set
> >> of patches for easier review. I will keep it that way
> >> for now.
> >>
> >> -Geoff
> >
>
>
> --
> Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-05-17 9:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 90+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-03-14 17:47 [PATCH v15 00/20] arm64 kexec kernel patches v15 Geoff Levand
2016-03-14 17:47 ` Geoff Levand
2016-03-14 17:48 ` [PATCH v15 01/20] arm64: Fold proc-macros.S into assembler.h Geoff Levand
2016-03-14 17:48 ` Geoff Levand
2016-03-14 17:48 ` [PATCH v15 08/20] arm64: Add new asm macro copy_page Geoff Levand
2016-03-14 17:48 ` Geoff Levand
2016-03-14 17:48 ` [PATCH v15 07/20] arm64: Promote KERNEL_START/KERNEL_END definitions to a header file Geoff Levand
2016-03-14 17:48 ` Geoff Levand
2016-03-14 17:48 ` [PATCH v15 06/20] arm64: kernel: Include _AC definition in page.h Geoff Levand
2016-03-14 17:48 ` Geoff Levand
2016-03-14 17:48 ` [PATCH v15 09/20] arm64: Add back cpu_reset routines Geoff Levand
2016-03-14 17:48 ` Geoff Levand
2016-03-14 17:48 ` [PATCH v15 12/20] arm64/kexec: Add core kexec support Geoff Levand
2016-03-14 17:48 ` Geoff Levand
2016-03-14 17:48 ` [PATCH v15 11/20] Revert "arm64: remove dead code" Geoff Levand
2016-03-14 17:48 ` Geoff Levand
2016-03-14 17:48 ` [PATCH v15 02/20] arm64: Cleanup SCTLR flags Geoff Levand
2016-03-14 17:48 ` Geoff Levand
2016-03-14 17:48 ` [PATCH v15 13/20] arm64/kexec: Enable kexec in the arm64 defconfig Geoff Levand
2016-03-14 17:48 ` Geoff Levand
2016-03-14 17:48 ` [PATCH v15 10/20] Revert "arm64: mm: remove unused cpu_set_idmap_tcr_t0sz function" Geoff Levand
2016-03-14 17:48 ` Geoff Levand
2016-03-14 17:48 ` [PATCH v15 04/20] arm64: Add new hcall HVC_CALL_FUNC Geoff Levand
2016-03-14 17:48 ` Geoff Levand
2016-03-14 17:48 ` [PATCH v15 03/20] arm64: Convert hcalls to use HVC immediate value Geoff Levand
2016-03-14 17:48 ` Geoff Levand
2016-03-15 13:50 ` Dave Martin
2016-03-15 13:50 ` Dave Martin
2016-03-15 18:15 ` Geoff Levand
2016-03-15 18:15 ` Geoff Levand
2016-03-16 13:50 ` Dave Martin
2016-03-16 13:50 ` Dave Martin
2016-03-16 14:09 ` Marc Zyngier
2016-03-16 14:09 ` Marc Zyngier
2016-03-17 16:47 ` Geoff Levand
2016-03-17 16:47 ` Geoff Levand
2016-03-14 17:48 ` [PATCH v15 05/20] arm64: kvm: allows kvm cpu hotplug Geoff Levand
2016-03-14 17:48 ` Geoff Levand
2016-03-14 17:48 ` [PATCH v15 18/20] arm64: kdump: add kdump support Geoff Levand
2016-03-14 17:48 ` Geoff Levand
2016-03-14 17:48 ` [PATCH v15 15/20] arm64: kdump: reserve memory for crash dump kernel Geoff Levand
2016-03-14 17:48 ` Geoff Levand
2016-03-18 18:08 ` James Morse
2016-03-18 18:08 ` James Morse
2016-03-31 7:19 ` AKASHI Takahiro
2016-03-31 7:19 ` AKASHI Takahiro
2016-04-01 6:16 ` AKASHI Takahiro
2016-04-01 6:16 ` AKASHI Takahiro
2016-03-14 17:48 ` [PATCH v15 20/20] arm64: kdump: update a kernel doc Geoff Levand
2016-03-14 17:48 ` Geoff Levand
2016-03-14 17:48 ` [PATCH v15 19/20] arm64: kdump: enable kdump in the arm64 defconfig Geoff Levand
2016-03-14 17:48 ` Geoff Levand
2016-03-14 17:48 ` [PATCH v15 14/20] arm64/kexec: Add pr_debug output Geoff Levand
2016-03-14 17:48 ` Geoff Levand
2016-03-14 17:48 ` [PATCH v15 16/20] arm64: limit memory regions based on DT property, usable-memory Geoff Levand
2016-03-14 17:48 ` Geoff Levand
2016-03-14 17:48 ` [PATCH v15 17/20] arm64: kdump: implement machine_crash_shutdown() Geoff Levand
2016-03-14 17:48 ` Geoff Levand
2016-03-18 18:08 ` James Morse
2016-03-18 18:08 ` James Morse
2016-03-21 13:29 ` James Morse
2016-03-21 13:29 ` James Morse
2016-03-31 7:57 ` AKASHI Takahiro
2016-03-31 7:57 ` AKASHI Takahiro
2016-03-31 8:12 ` Marc Zyngier
2016-03-31 8:12 ` Marc Zyngier
2016-03-31 10:10 ` Mark Rutland
2016-03-31 10:10 ` Mark Rutland
2016-04-01 8:45 ` AKASHI Takahiro
2016-04-01 8:45 ` AKASHI Takahiro
2016-04-01 9:36 ` Mark Rutland
2016-04-01 9:36 ` Mark Rutland
2016-04-04 9:27 ` AKASHI Takahiro
2016-04-04 9:27 ` AKASHI Takahiro
2016-03-31 7:46 ` AKASHI Takahiro
2016-03-31 7:46 ` AKASHI Takahiro
2016-03-31 10:22 ` James Morse
2016-03-31 10:22 ` James Morse
2016-04-01 1:59 ` [PATCH v15 00/20] arm64 kexec kernel patches v15 Dave Young
2016-04-01 1:59 ` Dave Young
2016-04-01 18:39 ` Geoff Levand
2016-04-01 18:39 ` Geoff Levand
2016-05-17 5:42 ` Dave Young
2016-05-17 5:42 ` Dave Young
2016-05-17 8:06 ` Marc Zyngier
2016-05-17 8:06 ` Marc Zyngier
2016-05-17 9:07 ` AKASHI Takahiro [this message]
2016-05-17 9:07 ` AKASHI Takahiro
2016-05-18 2:09 ` Dave Young
2016-05-18 2:09 ` Dave Young
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160517090602.GA31879@linaro.org \
--to=takahiro.akashi@linaro.org \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=dyoung@redhat.com \
--cc=geoff@infradead.org \
--cc=james.morse@arm.com \
--cc=kexec@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=marc.zyngier@arm.com \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.